Thirty7ven
Banned
It was a deep cut on Gene park saying this is a weed game.
Didn’t mean to pull your chain.
Last edited:
-
Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.
It was a deep cut on Gene park saying this is a weed game.
Didn’t mean to pull your chain.
Success
Member
Sleepwalker
Member
I agree, very fair overall.This is the best review, by the way.
It really shows he played the game in its entirety and actually inspected the game to find the good and the bad.
10/10 review!
oh watch get even lower when people they tried to hide it from, review it
Hari Seldon
Member
I was planning on getting this when done with BG3, but now it is wait for a sale territory. Generally I find Bethesda games too tedious so if this one is even more tedious than average then waiting a few months for a sale plus some QoL mods is the smart move imo.
SlimySnake
Flashless at the Golden Globes
lol the game is at 88 on metacritic. what are we even doing?
DragoonKain
Neighbours from Hell
I'm not a fan of randomly generated stuff. It's a big reason why I hate so many roguelikes although that's a little bit different since those are not open world games usually and it's part of a gameplay loop. But the biggest reason why I hate randomly generated areas is I want to see the creators vision of these worlds. I want to explore worlds that are hand crafted by these creators. I want to play in what they envision their worlds feeling like. Not what some piece of software throws together randomly.
Skyrim didn't have randomly generated islands or forests. They just made a big detailed world. I don't think anyone would have complained if back when Starfield was first announced, they said there'd be 4 or 5 really big planets. This feels like they're trying to outdo No Man's Sky. But No Man's Sky is a different kind of game.
I feel the same way with Borderlands too. Not randomly generated worlds, but their randomly generated guns. Eventually, they all start to feel same-y, and uninteresting. So yeah, just not a fan of anything randomly generated in gaming. Craft a world you're proud of and trust the gamer is going to enjoy their time in it.
You said that they said they’d overhauled their physics.
Unless they claimed that this overhaul meant that the ships in the game had ‘realistic’ momentum when flying through space, then they’ve done nothing wrong.
Was a specific claim made?
The line about sci fi games with no fantasy elements is particularly funny, as if the vast majority of sci-fi games without fantasy elements aren’t full of countless examples of unrealistic physics.
Like, what on earth are you talking about?
To cap it off, Starfield has fantasy elements!
Last edited:
Punished Miku
Human Rights Subscription Service
You know. Everyone knows.
Cyberpunkd
Member
Compared to Oblivion and original Fallout games they are definitely a step back. Also Obsidian did it way better with NV.
mckmas8808
Mckmaster uses MasterCard to buy Slave drives
Polygon (no score) says that the game falls apart under way too much tedium
Starfield sterilizes the final frontier
Starfield will be released Sept. 6, with early access starting Sept. 1. The best moments in this vast Xbox/PC exclusive are hidden beneath too much tedium.www.polygon.com
This is shocking to be honest. Did they just not like the game?
They have the same score, that's why.
Madflavor
Member
Why would an Xbox shill knowingly post a video that paints the biggest and most important Xbox release in many years in a negative light?
The Alanah Pearce takes on Gaf have always been reliably smooth brained shit.
Thirty7ven
Banned
People thought Starfield was going to “save” Xbox but Xbox saved Starfield it seems.
The game must’ve been a mess when Phil dropped there cash.
The game must’ve been a mess when Phil dropped there cash.
The Pleasure
Member
Red5
Member
Games scoring lower than 95 MC are literally unplayable garbage.....
Ass of Can Whooping
Gold Member
What's creature variety like on planets?
Kacho
Member
It’s Heisenberg007…
ulantan
Member
Fuck
a multicultural team of v
Member
What is funny is Mass Effect already figured this out years ago. ME1 had only a handful of planets you could actually visit, but how the rest of the galaxy was presented and the excellent writing that each planet had as backstory made it feel like you did explore the whole galaxy.
VideoGameEnjoyer
Member
This may have been Redfall level if not for the year+ delay.
Guess that was a smart move.
Guess that was a smart move.
tmlDan
Member
you're asking that when he has 60k viewers?
Heisenberg007
Gold Journalism
87, the same as Halo Infinite.
I wasn't expecting any more, to be honest. I even voted for 85-89 yesterday and commented in this very thread that it'll be between 86-88. But I know people were expecting more (90-95 or even 95+) from Starfield, and it didn't live up to its potential.
The sad part is that it could have been a special game because we don't get games like these -- open-universe space RPGs.
Lokaum D+
Member
its 87 with only 51 reviews at the moment, chance are that ll drop at least 1 or 2 points if this game got the same amount of reviews that a AAA normaly gets.
Last edited:
LiquidMetal14
hide your water-based mammals
As somebody who was really on the fence about this and really wanted to get it I think after reading some of the reviews there are some pretty glaring issues and I wasn't even going to game pass this I have money set aside to get the premium and wanted to play it tomorrow.
I'm still not 100% on it but I'm going to do some more reading on it today but not a terrible game but it's exactly kind of what I expected and unfortunately some people really overhyped this game and unfortunately if it wasn't for that I think we would all be happier than we are with this. But looking at them loading screens and some of the performance issues, I really do expect more from a flagship title and it shows the state of things over at Microsoft or Bethesda even if they did cut some corners by not releasing performance modes for the console. I really am looking forward to seeing the PC performance on this but overall I am not disappointed because I think I really did expectations probably 8 as far as the score but I'm more disappointed based on the level of hype as some people really over did it with their anticipation setting this up as a sure 9/10.
I'm still not 100% on it but I'm going to do some more reading on it today but not a terrible game but it's exactly kind of what I expected and unfortunately some people really overhyped this game and unfortunately if it wasn't for that I think we would all be happier than we are with this. But looking at them loading screens and some of the performance issues, I really do expect more from a flagship title and it shows the state of things over at Microsoft or Bethesda even if they did cut some corners by not releasing performance modes for the console. I really am looking forward to seeing the PC performance on this but overall I am not disappointed because I think I really did expectations probably 8 as far as the score but I'm more disappointed based on the level of hype as some people really over did it with their anticipation setting this up as a sure 9/10.
Freelance Yakuza
Member
Has anyone compared it to Baldur's Gate 3 yet?
Last edited:
Heisenberg007
Gold Journalism
Watch this review for a very in-depth and accurate representation/state of the game.
Go_Ly_Dow
Member
Imagine if the game launched in 2022 like originally planned, whilst also being on PS5. Would have released in a really bad state.
Last edited:
Coulomb_Barrier
Member
I read a couple early impressions and the writing was on the wall that this was no GOTY contender lol.
I think as someone mentioned, as Bethesda/MS were petty and tried to control the media by denying review outlets codes for the game, those reviews will from denied sites will come back to bite them in the ass as they will drop the MC lower. If it is 87 now it will likely drop to 85 at least.
I think as someone mentioned, as Bethesda/MS were petty and tried to control the media by denying review outlets codes for the game, those reviews will from denied sites will come back to bite them in the ass as they will drop the MC lower. If it is 87 now it will likely drop to 85 at least.
Last edited:
Topher
Gold Member
All good. I misunderstood.
It could go either way really. Next review could be 7 or could be 10? No way to know.
Guerilla Munch
Member
holy fuck, TotK confirmed GotY
Star Wars Outlaws confirmed Starfield killer
what a time to be alive
Star Wars Outlaws confirmed Starfield killer
what a time to be alive
Kacho
Member
Why would anyone do that?
Mephisto40
Member
I'm not sure how this game is getting 10/10's from anybody after watching this
Last edited:
graywolf323
Member
honestly I think I’d be more excited if it was like ME1 with zero procedurally generated planets
Freelance Yakuza
Member
They shouldn't BUT doesn't mean they won't
twilo99
Gold Member
I didn't know streamers got them is all and he has way less than that usually .. at least from what I've seen
nowhat
Member
We've gone from "my face is tired" to "my face is haired".The bugs in the game are something
SirKicksalot
Member
I just noticed that this guy now works at IGN. He gave DNF an 80, Prey 2017 a 4 and Starfield a 7.5 lmao
And 9.5 to Fallout 4
Last edited:
tmlDan
Member
Every time, i don't get why people hate her - all her content is controversy free and her streams are super chill. She just loves games.
Seems like they just hate that she's pretty and makes money?
digoutyoursoul
Member
This is the best review, by the way.
It really shows he played the game in its entirety and actually inspected the game to find the good and the bad.
10/10 review!
Listening to it and comes across well, no hyperbole like a lot of frauds out there.
Zathalus
Member
I find it hilarious when people recommend a review as being an accurate representation of the game when they themselves haven't played it, so would of course have no idea if it's accurate or not.
Last edited:
peish
Member
this is worse than i expected.
so there is no real space ship segments.
just a window dressing around each planet with random ship encounters....
I also did not expect so much menus surfing and loading screens, bad traversal mechanics breaks the open world immersion.
whoops, Starfield is looking like MS FF16. They took too much budget to implement new things and had to fall back to archaic gameplay loops.
tmlDan
Member
He used to always have 30-60k until he stopped playing shooters, which he is great at - its prob just release hype but he has a ton of fans.
Last edited:
Lokaum D+
Member
you are 100% right but in this industry a bad review ll always generate more clicks then a good one
And is this FUD…are they in the room with us right now?
Coulomb_Barrier
Member
It's 87 now but with only 44 reviews. It will only go down from here and will end at like 84-85. Yeah, hardly a disaster but for a game hyped up as the saviour for Xbox for the past 3 years it's a huge disappointment.