mckmas8808
Mckmaster uses MasterCard to buy Slave drives
Yeah this is pretty interesting. I thought they would hold today because we actually got good news today.
yoopoo said:Anyone still doing Options here...I did some quick reading here http://www.zecco.com/optionstradingeducation/Basics.aspx and I'm still utterly confused.
I'm gonna head over to http://www.investopedia.com and try to make some sense out of it.
sonarrat said:Yes, I do options and I have an OK grasp of the concepts.
Call = one contract obligating the writer to sell 100 shares of stock at a set price on or before a set date.
Put = one contract obligating the writer to buy 100 shares of stock at a set price on or before a set date.
With either one, if you sell to open, you are writing the option and you get the moneys, while holding the stock (or not, if you're a baller). If you buy to open, you are buying an option.
Ninja_Hawk said:I was actually wondering the same thing not too long ago, I looked it up but I didn't get it. So you're basically buying and selling contracts to buy or sell stocks at a certain price within a time period. But you have have the right to, you necessarily have to. This allows you to choose whatever price to buy or sell some shares at, but you don't have to. This could allow you to buy shares at a low price when it's high, or sell shares at a high price when it's low. Is that right?
tyguy20204 said:Are we finally going to run out of steam soon?
Ninja_Hawk said:Ok, guys so i've been doing more research and i'm considering trading options, I was led by my brokerage firm to read this book that apparently all investors are supposed to regarding the risks of option writing and holding. I looked at a few chapters of it and I think I got the gist of some of the risks, basically just making sure you have the money to cover whatever option you are writing, there may be stuff i'm missing but that's what I got out of it.
I was just wondering if there was a simpler, more condensed version of that book or someone could explain the most important things about it. 'Cause as I was reading it I was just thinking, "do all investors really read ALL of this", and is it hard to get into because it sounds simple but going through that book and the warnings from my broker kind intimidated me.![]()
yoopoo said:Still trying to understand options:
Lets try this example: Say I have 100 shares of FRE, at a current price of $2.00. And I 'Sell to Open' with strike price of $3.00 - exp date of 9/19/09
If the buyer of the options contract exercise his right to buy the stock at $3.00, that will force you to sell at $3.00.What happens if the price does reach $3.00+ by 9/19?
The contract will be worthless and you won't be forced to sell.What happens if it doesn't reach $3.00?
yoopoo said:Alright make sense....but using that same example, how much net profit do I stand to make?
FYI: can't access that calculator right now...on a limited net access.
thegreyfox said:If you write a call at a strike of $30, that just means that you are selling the stock at $30 only.
Nobody would bother to exercise the contract(buy at $30) if the stock goes under $30 because the market would be selling it for under $30($25 in your case). So the writer would just pocket the cost of the contract.
thegreyfox said:If you write a call at a strike of $30, that just means that you are selling the stock at $30 only.
Nobody would bother to exercise the contract(buy at $30) if the stock goes under $30 because the market would be selling it for under $30($25 in your case). So the writer would just pocket the cost of the contract.
kathode said:And we're above 1030 again.
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/Investors-trading-3-stocks-apf-3151182490.html?x=0&sec=topStories&pos=4&asset=&ccode=WASHINGTON (AP) -- Investors are still trading common shares of Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and American International Group Inc. by the billions, even though analysts say their prices are almost certain to go to zero.
All three are majority-owned by the government and are losing huge sums of money. The Securities and Exchange Commission and other regulators lack authority to end trading of stocks in such "zombie" companies that technically are alive -- until the government takes them off life support.
Shares of the two mortgage giants and the insurer have been swept up in a summer rally in financial stocks. Investors have been trading their shares at abnormally high volumes, despite analysts' warnings that they're destined to lose their money.
"People have done well by trading them (in the short term), but when it gets to the end of the road, these stocks are going to be worth zero," said Bose George, an analyst with the investment bank Keefe, Bruyette & Woods Inc.
Some of the activity involves day traders aiming to profit from short-term price swings, George said. But he said inexperienced investors might have the misimpression that the companies may recover or be rescued.
"That would be kind of unfortunate," he said. "There could be a lot of improvement in the economy, and these companies would still be worth zero."
The government continues to support the companies with billions in taxpayer money, saying they still play a crucial role in the financial system.
Fannie and Freddie buy loans from banks and sell them to investors -- a role critical to the mortgage market. They have tapped about $96 billion out of a potential $400 billion in aid from the Treasury Department.
Officials have said AIG's failure would be disastrous for the financial markets. Treasury and the Federal Reserve have spent about $175 billion on AIG and AIG-related securities. The company also has access to $28 billion from the $700 billion financial industry bailout.
But analysts say the wind-down strategies for the companies are almost sure to wipe out any common equity, making their shares worthless.
"There are some folks that believe that somehow that 20 percent (of the stock) that's out there in the public market might be worth something someday," said Daniel Alpert, managing director of the investment bank Westwood Capital LLC. But he said the three companies are doomed because they are "massively indebted," and the values of their assets are declining.
tarius1210 said:CAE over $8.
Ether_Snake, you may break even soon.
It's funny. I walked into work today and my co-worker says "Sell your stock, your rich. Disney just bought us. I'm like "What the hell are you talking about". I always watch Bloomberg TV before I leave for work and I didn't see anything about an acquisition. So I checked my e-mail and it turns out all of us recieved a letter from Disney's CEO. I'm like "What the fuck?". I never knew we were an acquisition target.Ether_Snake said:Disney buys Marvel! MVL up 25%.
You can kiss that "Disney interested in buying EA" rumor good bye now.
tarius1210 said:It's funny. I walked into work today and my co-worker says "Sell your stock, your rich. Disney just bought us. I'm like "What the hell are you talking about". I always watch Bloomberg TV before I leave for work and I didn't see anything about an acquisition. So I checked my e-mail and it turns out all of us recieved a letter from Disney's CEO. I'm like "What the fuck?". I never knew we were an acquisition target.
As a Marvel employee and as a shareholder I am so torn on this deal.
I'm sure some employees will be given the axe sometime next year.mckmas8808 said:That's crazy. So does that means some of you guys will be fired?
I really thought DIS would buy THQI or COOL.Ether_Snake said:Damn, BHI dropped almost 10% today after announcing that they'll acquire BJ Services. :|
Now that DIS is not gonna buy ERTS, the next potential buyer in line would be MSFT I think, but I don't see them doing that. Would be a bad move, they don't need a weight on their shoulders.
Ether_Snake said:oops