Host Samurai
Member
I really don't know jack shit about stocks and how they work, but I am will to buy $1000 worth of Facebook shares than pulling out in a few weeks.
I really don't know jack shit about stocks and how they work, but I am will to buy $1000 worth of Facebook shares than pulling out in a few weeks.
Hmm... what to do with FB. I could invest a lot of money and pull at the end of the day to see how much it rose. Or... wait it out.
Hmm... what to do with FB. I could invest a lot of money and pull at the end of the day to see how much it rose. Or... wait it out.
Id wait.
Asia is getting crushed right now due to greece and USA econ data. Going to be a bad day tomorrow
It's been a bad week man. Anybody trade currencies? Kinda curious about the Euro, hopefully I can spot a bottom.
I don't like playing the valuation guessing game but I do agree with everything I've heard regarding buying in on FB by retail investors.If logic tells you to wait and not buy Facebook because it is the most overvalued piece of shit stock in modern times, do the opposite.
It's the stock market.
I actually think today is going to be a good day for the market, as a whole. Greece trouble has to be priced in already, it's not like no one saw it coming.
I'm staying away from Facebook, but I see it having a quick run up followed by a freefall later in the day. I'm playing ZNGA for the inevitable FB pop.
Dumb question but is it realistic for a 23 year old to start investing in stocks? I have wanted to start doing it for some years and is planning on doing it early next year. I just don't want a bank advisor to look weird at me lol.
I also plan on controlling some of my investing myself.
Dumb question but is it realistic for a 23 year old to start investing in stocks? I have wanted to start doing it for some years and is planning on doing it early next year. I just don't want a bank advisor to look weird at me lol.
I also plan on controlling some of my investing myself.
Wow, so I think I was wrong on every single count in my last point. Lost quite a few diners on ZNGA. I hate the cOmpany anyway, so I guess it's fitting.
Dumb question but is it realistic for a 23 year old to start investing in stocks? I have wanted to start doing it for some years and is planning on doing it early next year. I just don't want a bank advisor to look weird at me lol.
I also plan on controlling some of my investing myself.
Yeah I lost a good $1,800 on ZNGA, my avg share price is $8.26 so I'm sure it'll eventually get up there. All it really takes is one news rumor of a possible buyout of the company or legalized online gambling for it to pop.
Surprisingly, Ford has hit me very hard recently...
Brother has invested in some stocks at around 12 I believe. Probably going to hold on to that one. I'm not sure why it's been dipping lately since from what I looked up, Ford has actually improved quite a lot with their new cars.
I'm guessing a lot of people just bailed after the Q1 report.
Very glad I cut my losses on that one.
Surprisingly, Ford has hit me very hard recently...
Dat FB! Killing off the retail buyer for another 5 years.
Friday - everyone sold some of their AAPL to get FB
Monday - everyone sold their FB to get back into AAPL
I was hoping AAPL was going to slide to 520 this week and I would had bought 100 shares.LOL probably. I had bad feelings about FB, I'll wait for it to bottom out before considering it to pick up, I have a feeling the first earnings report may be surprising.
Good thing I kept holding my Apple.
My mum actually wanted to buy shares in facebook :lol, thankfully so far, I said no.
Also...as soon as the number of new facebook users starts to fizzle out, surely the stock will start to drop like a stone??
Although I guess they are more resilient than other social networking sites, now that most people have their photos and contacts on there.
Rolling Stone said:Last week, in response to an Overstock.com motion to unseal certain documents, the banks lawyers, apparently accidentally, filed an unredacted version of Overstocks motion as an exhibit in their declaration of opposition to that motion. In doing so, they inadvertently entered into the public record a sort of greatest-hits selection of the very material theyve been fighting for years to keep sealed.
Rolling Stone said:We also find out here how Wall Street professionals manipulated public opinion by buying off and/or intimidating experts in their respective fields. In one email made public in this document, a lobbyist for SIFMA, the Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association, tells a Goldman executive how to engage an expert who otherwise would go work for our more powerful enemies, i.e. would work with Overstock on the companys lawsuit.
"He should be someone we can work with, especially if he sees that cooperation results in resources, both data and funding," the lobbyist writes, "while resistance results in isolation."
Rolling Stone said:A quick primer on what naked short selling is. First of all, short selling, which is a completely legal and often beneficial activity, is when an investor bets that the value of a stock will decline. You do this by first borrowing and then selling the stock at its current price; then, after the price drops, you go out, buy the same number of shares at the reduced price, and return the shares to your original lender. You then earn a profit on the difference between the original price and the new, lower price.
What matters here is the technical issue of how you borrow the stock. Typically, if youre a hedge fund and you want to short a company, you go to some big-shot investment bank like Goldman or Morgan Stanley and place the order. They then go out into the world, find the shares of the stock you want to short, borrow them for you, then physically settle the trade later.
But sometimes its not easy to find those shares to borrow. Sometimes the shares are controlled by investors who might have no interest in lending them out. Sometimes theres such scarcity of borrowable shares that banks/brokers like Goldman have to pay a fee just to borrow the stock.
These hard-to-borrow stocks, stocks that cost money to borrow, are called negative rebate stocks. In some cases, these negative rebate stocks cost so much just to borrow that a short-seller would need to see a real price drop of 35 percent in the stock just to break even. So how do you short a stock when you cant find shares to borrow? Well, one solution is, you dont even bother to borrow them. And then, when the trade is done, you dont bother to deliver them. You just do the trade anyway without physically locating the stock.
Thus in this document we have another former Merrill Pro president, Thomas Tranfaglia, saying in a 2005 email: We are NOT borrowing negatives I have made that clear from the beginning. Why would we want to borrow them? We want to fail them.
Trafaglia, in other words, didnt want to bother paying the high cost of borrowing negative rebate stocks. Instead, he preferred to just sell stock he didnt actually possess. That is what is meant by, We want to fail them. Trafaglia was talking about creating fails or failed trades, which is what happens when you dont actually locate and borrow the stock within the time the law allows for trades to be settled.
If this sounds complicated, just focus on this: naked short selling, in essence, is selling stock you do not have. If you dont have to actually locate and borrow stock before you short it, youre creating an artificial supply of stock shares.
People always like to say, oh there will be something new. Um no I don't think so. Facebook has become the standard for social networking. The reason why it replaced Myspace as the new "thing" was because at the time social networking at in it's infancy. Anybody could have become the top if they made the right moves. Also once you become a juggernaut in an industry there has to be some great innovation to topple you and that can take years as well. Facebook has already acquired a large amount of user information even if the number of new users slows down, considering how many already use it they are sitting on a goldmine of data.
FB just has to find a way to organize that data so it will be useful to companies and advertisers or find new ways of analyzing it to prove it's usefulness toward social marketing. I'm optimistic on FB longterm, just not at this price, very overvalued if we take away the hope and optimism and look at the numbers.
I disagree. The barrier to entry on something like FB is just insanely low. FB will get lazy (one could argue they already have... Case in point being their mobile apps) and sonme competitor will catch them slipping.
The threat to them is constant, and their position (and your $$) could be gone overnight, relatively speaking. Not worth the risk for the limited upside, IMO. It really is the dot com bubble all over again with these stocks.
I got UBS and CS shares, both not doing very well. But in the end bank shares aren't bad and give you good dividends. And of course those two Swiss banks are too big to fail for such a small country.
Anyone else see Cramer recommend Microsoft to buy Electronic Arts on Mad Money tonight?
Not sure if serious.
Am I serious? No, I found it funny, but it did made me go "hmmm" funny to hear an outsider's prespective. It would certainly lead to an entertaining thread if nothing else.
Can someone explain how bond pricing works to me?
I mean, is it actually a safer bet that stocks? Like if the stock market completely tanks, will bonds tank as well? If they do, will they just tank less?
haha. Im the exact same way. Got a bunch of cash sitting in my portfolio, waiting to buy 100 shares of AAPL. Can't buy in good Conscience since I messed up not buying last Friday at 530.Fuck it, ive been sitting on a pile of cash waiting to 'time' this market, and it simply just isnt working
I know I should be doing this
http://www.bogleheads.org/wiki/Vide...osophy#Invest_early_and_often_.28Rule_.232.29
But I am just such a cheap, frugal bastard that I want to get in on the lowest possible point