Deaf Spacker
Memb
Lol is this a thing people do?
We've not even seen it yet, our showing is in 11 hours.
Lol is this a thing people do?
A director's cut of the movie won't fix the Enchantress and Incubus being uninteresting villains, nor will it fix the general lack of justification for the Joker being involved outside of flashback stuff, nor will it completely fix the movie doing a terrible job juggling its cast, nor will it fix character issues that were obviously not victims of bad editing. This isn't to say that a recut version can't at least be less bad with those areas, but I don't think just adding back in scenes and recutting things are going to go as far as we'd all hope nor do I think holding out for a recut version of the movie is going to make a big difference on whether or not somebody is going to like the movie or not.
That said, while I am very unsatisfied with how this movie turned out, I sincerely hope it gets a sequel because there absolutely is potential for a great movie there and I really think the cast could knock it out of the park if they were working with better material going by what they were able to do with what they were given here.
Killer Croc, Deadshot and Harley are pretty bad.
Boomerang just robs a lot of banks, I don't know if we are ever told why he is seen as such a bad guy and did we ever find out why Rope Guy is even in prison?
I lol'd.Okay so things the sequel...
Oh yeah the opening digital intro cards for each character with character profile tidbits that seemed to be written by the film's titling team screamed straight to dvd producer trying to be creative with a film in post.
Someone spoil me, how does Slipknot bite it? I don't even know if he bites it, but come on, it's obvious to anyone he bites it.
Didn't you read the report that the studio actually brought in the marketing company that created the trailers to edit the actual movie? hahahaha
I also really don't wanna see this joker change. I like this interpretation and I think he needs to be set apart from the others, especially visually and in this movie it works. Otherwise he'll just feel like a sillier Heath Ledger imo.
Boomerang tells him that the bombs in their necks aren't real, just mind games and that he's gunna split so slipknot should join him, he lets Slipknot run off and then his bomb goes off. Everything else he does was in the trailer.
Someone spoil me, how does Ropeguy bite it? I don't even know if he bites it, but come on, it's obvious to anyone he bites it.
I also really don't wanna see this joker change. I like this interpretation and I think he needs to be set apart from the others, especially visually and in this movie it works. Otherwise he'll just feel like a sillier Heath Ledger imo.
Boomerang tells him that the bombs in their necks aren't real, just mind games and that he's gunna split so slipknot should join him, he lets Slipknot run off and then his bomb goes off. Everything else he does was in the trailer.
My girlfriend and I both liked the movie. Sucks to see most everyone here is not enjoying it.
I liked it and I payed $20 for it. I don't feel cheated. So if you're a bad moviegoer I guess so am I. But if you liked it why should anyone tell you otherwise right?I watched the movie for free and was not even on my radar.
I thought the movie was fine but I'm not into DC comic lore or comics in general. I watched Batman the Animated series when I was a kid on TV is about as much I know about who i saw in the film.
Honestly I don't think it was as bad as I've read and I could hear people discussing the same thing during the credits. I think stands alright on its own. That's about all I got to say. I think I might have been fine paying for this actually. Does this make me a bad moviegoer?
Heh...if WB is smart, they should embrace their crazy fans and conspiracy theorists. That will make for more effective marketing campaign.
Right, absolutely, but I was more going for "you only need a few minutes to see what kind of Joker we're getting" regardless of whether it's a good interpretation of the Joker or not.Ledger's wouldn't be near as good if he is cast in this movie. I agree that Leto is trying too hard in the wrong direction, but writing/directing has a lot of influence to the actor's preformence. He could have been better.
Shame WB is already too deep in this bed they've made not to start this universe from scratch again.
I think you guys should stop doing this, theres enough people here and outside that seem to enjoy it and even though you don't you should probably at least encourage people to go see it on their own and make up their own minds. Even on rotten tomatoes there's a pretty big divide between the regular viewers and critics and maybe even some of the critics if the (2.5 rotten can mean fresh) thing is to be believed. Or just let then read some of the reviews or thoughts in this thread and let them decide that way if it's worth seeing. It's kinda shitty to potentially screw someone out of what might've been a great experience for them just because it maybe wasn't for you.WB have absolutely shat the bed with this film. Anyone who hasn't seen it yet, don't bother.
Thanks. I think I actually would've laughed at that, but in an ironic, meta sort of way. Honestly, this dude shouldn't have even been in the trailers or part of the marketing at all. Was way too obvious.
If JL Part 1 is a disaster and grosses under BvS, I think we'll see the universe rebooted. For one, Affleck is not gonna be tied to a mess any longer than he has to.Shame WB is already too deep in this bed they've made not to start this universe from scratch again.
I liked it and I payed $20 for it. I don't feel cheated. So if you're a bad moviegoer I guess so am I. But if you liked it why should anyone tell you otherwise right?
I don't really think Harley would be that much different without that subplot. If anything, you'd get an even better Harley ifEspecially since having Joker back adds a lot to Harley's character and does a lot for world building.
I'm going by that "leaked" list of cut scenes that everybody seems to have accepted as legit. Regardless of whether those are legit or not, there's only so much you can do with restoring cut scenes. Unless you're fine with an overly bloated and long mess of a movie, Croc, Boomerang, and Katana are going to all be comically underused.We don't know what or how much they cut for other characters so I don't really think you can say that for sure.
Was that comment about "if he dies" a joke?
If JL Part 1 is a disaster and grosses under BvS, I think we'll see the universe rebooted. For one, Affleck is not gonna be tied to a mess any longer than he has to.
Yeah his comment with reference to Ledger's death came across as something in bad taste imo.Was that comment about "if he dies" a joke?
It's hard to tell. People have morbidly speculated that Jared Leto commits suicide (get it, Suicide Squad?) to immortalize his performance and transend what Heath Ledger achieved once he died.
Given the reception of Suicide Squad, that would be a bad way to go out.
For those of you who are like me, and don't know what D-box is, it's "a non-intrusive enhancement" for the movie. It's basically a motion-controlled seat:
Yeah I watched Fan4stic a couple months ago and it legitimately had no redeeming qualities aside from maybe the main 4 actors. This on the other hand is half and half imo but I like the good half enough to look past the bad, and again I can completely see and understand why people wouldn't like it but it's in no way nearly as bad as some are making it out to be and I feel similarly about BvS. I don't think that the issues being stated about either movie are untrue, but they're definitely exaggerated if the conclusion is "worst movie ever"I'm reading this thread for the first time. It seems like we're the odd ones out. I'm scratching my head at the over the top reactions of how this movie is the worst thing ever. Really? I dunno I thought fantastic 4 was hit garbage but Suicide Squad is no where close as an Incoherent mess that movie was.
Maybe I'm getting old and have no dog in this fight.
I meant more about the Joker's abusive relationship with Harley adding to her character, not really the love plot and coming to save her. As for the others, it doesn't entirely "fix" them sure, but it elevates them from being useless like they pretty much are now, though I don't really have hope for Croc. I haven't seen the list of cut scenes but I'd be greatful if someone could show it to me, I'm just going off of rumors and my opinion right now.I don't really think Harley would be that much different without that subplot. If anything, you'd get an even better Harley ifand you even really get the same endingit was played off as her just really making herself believe that Mr. J was coming to save herwhere she approaches the Enchantress to try and be reunited with him even without the other fakeout of him being seemingly killed earlier on
The way the movie uses him honestly comes off more like them not trusting the film to stand on its own without a more recognizable character to draw people in.
Which, again, that is something that totally could be fixed in editing, but I don't have any delusions that it's something they'd ever want to address.
I'm going by that "leaked" list of cut scenes that everybody seems to have accepted as legit. Regardless of whether those are legit or not, there's only so much you can do with restoring cut scenes. Unless you're fine with an overly bloated and long mess of a movie, Croc, Boomerang, and Katana are going to all be comically underused.As it is, I doubt the mess with Killer Croc being almost given a big moment at the end and then it just ending up being that the nameless military dudes doing all the actual work was an editing problem, unless they just flatout reshot most of that portion of the movie
So the movie opens with Smith working a heavy bag, and the seat's jostling left-right-left-right with every punch.
Yeah his comment with reference to Ledger's death came across as something in bad taste imo.
Which is likely at least three films starring and two cameos. Contractually speaking.
Let's be real, is "don't see this movie" really that much a worse message than "this movie that is not reviewing well is fiiiiiine, ignore the haters"?I think you guys should stop doing this, theres enough people here and outside that seem to enjoy it and even though you don't you should probably at least encourage people to go see it on their own and make up their own minds. Even on rotten tomatoes there's a pretty big divide between the regular viewers and critics and maybe even some of the critics if the (2.5 rotten can mean fresh) thing is to be believed. Or just let then read some of the reviews or thoughts in this thread and let them decide that way if it's worth seeing. It's kinda shitty to potentially screw someone out of what might've been a great experience for them just because it maybe wasn't for you.
I think you guys should stop doing this, theres enough people here and outside that seem to enjoy it and even though you don't you should probably at least encourage people to go see it on their own and make up their own minds. Even on rotten tomatoes there's a pretty big divide between the regular viewers and critics and maybe even some of the critics if the (2.5 rotten can mean fresh) thing is to be believed. Or just let then read some of the reviews or thoughts in this thread and let them decide that way if it's worth seeing. It's kinda shitty to potentially screw someone out of what might've been a great experience for them just because it maybe wasn't for you.
I did this for Tammy after 10 mins being in the movie theater.
Worst 10 mins I have ever witnessed in film.
what did you expect from a Melissa McCarthy movie?
Oh hell noSpy is a better movie than anything Daniel Craig has ever starred in.
Yeah I watched Fan4stic a couple months ago and it legitimately had no redeeming qualities aside from maybe the main 4 actors. This on the other hand is half and half imo but I like the good half enough to look past the bad, and again I can completely see and understand why people wouldn't like it but it's in no way nearly as bad as some are making it out to be and I feel similarly about BvS. I don't think that the issues being stated about either movie are untrue, but they're definitely exaggerated if the conclusion is "worst movie ever"
What the fuck am I reading?Spy is a better movie than anything Daniel Craig has ever starred in.
I say go back to standalone films from creative auteurs. Look to The Dark Knight. That was DC's strength and the model they should have followed, not Avengers. That doesn't mean copy Nolan. That means open the gates to real filmmakers and give them real creative control. Be the opposite of Marvel, who demand directors that need to play ball with the studio and stay "on brand". Instead, be the arthouse destination for superhero films.