If this is the worst movie some of you have ever seen, you're lucky bastards. It's a 5.5-6/10 movie, nothing offensive, nothing great.
Stop trying to be apart of the hivemind. Makes you look a bit ridiculous. It's fine to dislike the movie, hell, hate it if you do, but objectively speaking, it's technically competent and far from being deserving of the shit like 'Worst experience I ever had viewing a film in my entire life."
The consensus from those who liked it seems to be "it wasn't that bad!".
No one is forcing you to go see it you know. If you don't think it's worth it then just don't go. I consider it to be a 6 elevated to a 7 due to some performances and the style of the movie and I don't feel like I wasted my time, of someone else decides that it's not for them and doesn't wanna go see it that's fine too. Not every opinion is an endorsement, just an opinion stating their thoughts.You know all these it was good but it has its problems 5.5-6/10 reviews.. if I could read my own review from the future and I decided it was a 5.5/10.. I wouldn't see it. There's not enough time in this life to be wasting it on 6/10 or lower anything. But then I'd create a time paradox and destroy my future self from existence.
I wonder if you'd be whining about the "hivemind" if it was a consensus good flick.If this is the worst movie some of you have ever seen, you're lucky bastards. It's a 5.5-6/10 movie, nothing offensive, nothing great.
Stop trying to be apart of the hivemind. Makes you look a bit ridiculous. It's fine to dislike the movie, hell, hate it if you do, but objectively speaking, it's technically competent and far from being deserving of the shit like 'Worst experience I ever had viewing a film in my entire life."
Arguably someone would.I wonder if you'd be whining about the "hivemind" if it was a consensus good flick.
🤔
See now your opinion of those things is subjective and clearly very divisive. You didn't like those things and many others didn't, but I did and so did many others. I'll admit that the story and editing are objectively poor but everything else is down to preference so I'm not going to argue with you about it. Let's just agree to disagree and move on from there.
Sure, and to that person we could ask "would you be complaining if this was a consensus bad/divisive flick?"Arguably someone would.
You can go ahead and like a movie with a shoddy story, thin characters, unearned moments, and shit dialogue, I won't stop you.
Is this what elitism looks like? Dude let it go you're just being silly at this point. You didn't like it, great, but why shit on those who did like it by going "NO IM RIGHT, ITS BAD BAD BAD AND NO ONE CAN SAY OR FEEL OTHERWISE". Like seriously.You can go ahead and like a movie with a shoddy story, thin characters, unearned moments, and shit dialogue, I won't stop you.
Yes.Is the finale of this movie really a CGI shitstorm?
Just seems like a roundabout argument.Sure, and to that person we could ask "would you be complaining if this was a consensus bad/divisive flick?"
You can go ahead and like a movie with a shoddy story, thin characters, unearned moments, and shit dialogue, I won't stop you.
it's almost the most generic version of that you can imagine.Is the finale of this movie really a CGI shitstorm?
You can go ahead and like a movie with a shoddy story, thin characters, unearned moments, and shit dialogue, I won't stop you.
Is the finale of this movie really a CGI shitstorm?
Exactly! Still, it's more competent than Suicide Squad.Plenty of people liked The Avengers.
Diablo saying that the squad is his family is really unearned. He just met those people a few hours prior and didn't do much.Not really. Actually who watched it with me didn't agree when I said the story was bad. The 3 of them. So opinions.
True, and definitely skewed higher than the RT average of 4.7/10. I'll admit that I haven't seen it yet, and I will, but man how does someone give it a 2/10. Can it possibly be that bad? I'm just shocked impressions are going back and forth between "it's pretty good" and "it's a f'ing shitshow". And you know, I don't think people are bandwagoning. I believe these are honest to goodness opinions.No one is forcing you to go see it you know. If you don't think it's worth it then just don't go. I consider it to be a 6 elevated to a 7 due to some performances and the style of the movie and I don't feel like I wasted my time, of someone else decides that it's not for them and doesn't wanna go see it that's fine too. Not every opinion is an endorsement, just an opinion stating their thoughts.
The first half might as well of been a giant music video of popular songs.
Not really. It's just pointing out the hypocrisy of whoever is making that stupid comment.Just seems like a roundabout argument.
You can go ahead and like a movie with a shoddy story, thin characters, unearned moments, and shit dialogue, I won't stop you.
Because there's more to a movie than the story? It's like a million different moving parts and the story is something that gives those moving parts direction. Not every movie is story heavy or has a good story and there are plenty of movies with weak stories that can be considered great movies. Like Pulp Fiction.
True, and definitely skewed higher than the RT average of 4.7/10. I'll admit that I haven't seen it yet, and I will, but man how does someone give it a 2/10. Can it possibly be that bad? I'm just shocked impressions are going back and forth between "it's pretty good" and "it's a f'ing shitshow". And you know, I don't think people are bandwagoning. I believe these are honest to goodness opinions.
"Worst movie ever" is definitely hyperbolic. But I can see why some people didnt like it and I can see why some people really didn't like it. Some people's negatives are my positives, it's just a highly subjective film. I liked the subjective things and they were strong enough to allow me to look past the objective stuff. But for those that don't i can see why they'd consider it a shit show. It's really something you need to see for yourself.True, and definitely skewed higher than the RT average of 4.7/10. I'll admit that I haven't seen it yet, and I will, but man how does someone give it a 2/10. Can it possibly be that bad? I'm just shocked impressions are going back and forth between "it's pretty good" and "it's a f'ing shitshow". And you know, I don't think people are bandwagoning. I believe these are honest to goodness opinions.
I didn't say that it was poorly executed. It just wasn't front and center or that deep which is my point, it's not what carries the film, it's style and characters do. Stop over reacting.The hell are you talking about? Pulp Fiction's narrative approach was groundbreaking. Don't confuse plot simplicity with poor execution.
Also Walter Chaw's review is LIFE: http://www.filmfreakcentral.net/ffc/2016/08/suicide-squad.html
Deadshotearned the right to see his daughter, I will tell you that much. The epilogue scene was really well done. Hell, Harley finally getting back with Joker in the break out as well for that matter.
Exactly! Still, it's more competent than Suicide Squad.
Diablo saying that the squad is his family is really unearned. He just met those people a few hours prior and didn't do much.
Except shit like Apocalypse and Gods of Egypt also came out this year.The hyperbole can stop. It's not the worst movie ever...but might be the worst you see this year.
Except shit like Apocalypse and Gods of Egypt also came out this year.
Except shit like Apocalypse and Gods of Egypt also came out this year.
Theatrical, I agree.And Batman v Superman
But I skipped both of those!
Hahaha, damn. That was a great read.Also Walter Chaw's review is LIFE: http://www.filmfreakcentral.net/ffc/2016/08/suicide-squad.html
Because there's more to a movie than the story? It's like a million different moving parts and the story is something that gives those moving parts direction. Not every movie is story heavy or has a good story and there are plenty of movies with weak stories that can be considered great movies. Like Pulp Fiction.
So if you wanna go back to the last page then come back.ayyyy lmao. Pulp Fiction has god-tier story. Nothing "weak" about it.
Maybe the worst you have to see and make up your own opinion on. j/kExcept shit like Apocalypse and Gods of Egypt also came out this year.
It does? Unless you mean it's orchestrated score. Its a mix of licensed music, songs created for the film and orchestrated music.
So if you wanna go back to the last page then come back.
Whatever man. Pulp Fiction isn't carried by its story, it's fairly thin and I doubt most of the people that enjoy the film care for it either. It's not bad but it's definitely not the greatest thing ever and that films strengths aren't its story. But we can agree to disagree.No, I read your other post. Still wrong.
This was a great read XDAlso Walter Chaw's review is LIFE: http://www.filmfreakcentral.net/ffc/2016/08/suicide-squad.html
Except shit like Apocalypse and Gods of Egypt also came out this year.
Also Walter Chaw's review is LIFE: http://www.filmfreakcentral.net/ffc/2016/08/suicide-squad.html
Because there's more to a movie than the story? It's like a million different moving parts and the story is something that gives those moving parts direction. Not every movie is story heavy or has a good story and there are plenty of movies with weak stories that can be considered great movies. Like Pulp Fiction.
Well the cgi, pacing, character development, and editing were all bad too.
So there's that.