Strangelove77
Member
Shitting on Pulp Fiction to prop up Suicide Squad.
Dear god.
Dear god.
Shitting on Pulp Fiction to prop up Suicide Squad.
Dear god.
Shitting on Pulp Fiction to prop up Suicide Squad.
Dear god.
Shitting on Pulp Fiction to prop up Suicide Squad.
Dear god.
Shitting on Pulp Fiction to prop up Suicide Squad.
Dear god.
Let's be honest, Pulp Fiction is a different sport entirely to any superhero film. Even TDK doesn't come close to Pulp Fiction quality. The best superhero film ain't cracking a legit top fifty film list.
Shitting on Pulp Fiction to prop up Suicide Squad.
Dear god.
These are some extreme mental gymnastics. I don't consider any of the characters or main characters in any of the marvel movies to be poorly written albeit boring, their motivations make sense and its their actors that generally elevate okay characters to great ones. I feel like Loki is a shit character in the MCU with a great actor and I don't care about any part of Loki or his motivations because I think he's a dumb villain I just like seeing Tom act. I'm not sure what discussion you're even attempting to have or what point you're arguing, it just looks like you're arguing for the sake of arguing.
It just never feels earned to me. We never learn enough about her beforehand. Had they had maybe had a scene of exposition and talked about June's findings in her tomb and saw cave drawings and talked about her in ancient history like Apocalypse then maybe. But she kinda just says it and then stuff happens.
Shitting on Pulp Fiction to prop up Suicide Squad.
Dear god.
.
Butthurt?, are you serious? If anything you seem much more upset at the fact that not only people don't agree with you but that you can't craft an argument. Also how is saying Pulp Fiction has a thin story and saying it's not the focus of the movie shitting on it? Some of you are the most reactionary people I've ever seen who spend more time complaining and whining than actually attempting to prove your point. But I guess some of you are capable of little more than drive by shitposting.The butthurt is real! Do you have stock options at WB?
Butthurt?, are you serious? If anything you seem much more upset at the fact that not only people don't agree with you but that you can't craft an argument. Also how is saying Pulp Fiction has a thin story and saying it's not the focus of the movie shitting on it? Some of you are the most reactionary people I've ever seen who spend more time complaining and whining than actually attempting to prove your point. But I guess some of you are capable of little more than drive by shitposting.
For the record, Pulp Fiction is one of my all time favorite movies and if some of you are going to shit the bed over something so simple, especially something that isn't an insult you're not worth the time.
lol..Suicide Squad Review Thread: Comparable to Pulp Fiction
Suicide Squad Review Thread: Comparable to Pulp Fiction
You know, I've never seen Pulp Fiction..
I've mentioned numerous times why it's good, I've also spend more time pointing out the movies flaws than I have pointing out its positives. Why would I be talking about anything other than Marvel's Loki? Pretending that I meant Loki as a whole is moving goal posts and I've repeadedly stated that the movie is around a 6-7 for me, not 'great' but I enjoyed it and think it has potential. You're going to whine about being abrasive then do the same thing and completely ignore all of my posts? That's up to you.In a nutshell you have made many subjective drive by posts and passed them off as facts. You mentioned Loki is a bad villain. Yet Loki has survived through the Viking stories and folklore. It's like saying Satan has a weak backstory. Marvels version although different, is constantly reinventing himself. And you seem to bus pass all the SS shortcomings to argue that it was great. What was good about it? You should articulate why it's good. Pacing, storytelling, cinematography? Enlighten us. Being abrasive will not get people to see what you see.
Because there's more to a movie than the story? It's like a million different moving parts and the story is something that gives those moving parts direction. Not every movie is story heavy or has a good story and there are plenty of movies with weak stories that can be considered great movies. Like Pulp Fiction.
You know, I've never seen Pulp Fiction..
Does SS suffer a similar problem this video points out?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=38Cy_Qlh7VM
The turn of events this thread has taken is absolutely incredible lmao.
Maybe it's just me but I'm absolutely convinced SS has managed to be a more polarizing film that even BvS could hope to imagine.
"The RT score is undeserved, it's far better than BvS"
"I liked BvS, but this was bad"
"It wasn't as bad as I expected"
"I hated BvS, but this was even worse"
"One of the worst films I've ever seen"
"*insert comparison to Pulp Fiction here*"
I'm part of the new breed guys, I was like 6 when that film came out
Why would I watch old shit when I can enjoy the new hotness!
Also it's probably shite
Whatever man. Pulp Fiction isn't carried by its story, it's fairly thin and I doubt most of the people that enjoy the film care for it either. It's not bad but it's definitely not the greatest thing ever and that films strengths aren't its story. But we can agree to disagree.
You know, I've never seen Pulp Fiction..
I'm part of the new breed guys, I was like 6 when that film came out
Why would I watch old shit when I can enjoy the new hotness!
Also it's probably shite
Does SS suffer a similar problem this video points out?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=38Cy_Qlh7VM
Whatever man. Pulp Fiction isn't carried by its story, it's fairly thin and I doubt most of the people that enjoy the film care for it either. It's not bad but it's definitely not the greatest thing ever and that films strengths aren't its story. But we can agree to disagree.
Updated
Does SS suffer a similar problem this video points out?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=38Cy_Qlh7VM
Not even surprised tbh
I've already explained my position in the post above. It wasn't even on defense of suicide squad, just a statement in general that's being taken out of context due to another user quoting me while I was quoting someone else. But you're right so I'm gunna stop.okay yeah man, this isn't a hill you want to die on, to defend something like suicide squad by putting down Pulp Fiction at the same time lmao
I feel like you guys should watch some movies that I like
Can I interest you all in a little film called...
Air Bud
Which is better, that or Suicide Squad?
Which is better, that or Suicide Squad?
Which is better, that or Pulp Fiction?
I just love the idea of turning this thread into a discussion about Air Bud.Not like this
I mean, Air Bud is pretty memorable...
I mean, Air Bud is pretty memorable...
Yeah I'd say it's the better film
I really upset some people huh lmao.
Truth.It's no Space Jam.
It's no Space Jam.
Air Bud - 43% 4.8
Pulp Fiction - 26%(1 rotten away from 25) 4.6
�� �� ��
Guys, guys, can we please get back on topic? The Suicide Squad Review Thread is not for discussing Air Bud. It's for discussion Thor: The Dark World and Iron Man 3.
If people want to take a statement out of context, spin it then take offense to it I can't really do much more than try to correct their understanding of my position. If people on this forum hate me for it so be it, but it wasn't a dig at the movie or something in defense of suicide squad. I just think it's a good example of a movie that has its story take a backseat to other things and is still a great film, whereas the poster I had originally quoted implied that the story should be front and center and without that it's a bad movie.No other reply in this thread will be more of an understatement than this.
Pack it up guys.
Guys, guys, can we please get back on topic? The Suicide Squad Review Thread is not for discussing Air Bud. It's for discussion Thor 2 and Iron Man 3.