Bridge of Spies is mediocre.
Munich is Spielberg's last example of a master craftsman at work. Everything since, good or bad, has had the same going through the motions feel.
We're talking about
directing specifically though. Bridge of Spies has somewhat limited material to go on from the writing, but the directing and editing skills are all there.
Also, you guys did not watch TinTin, I can tell. That ship battle sequence is literally batshit
insane. Even more than Spiderman 2's subway segment? Yes. Tony Zhou was not kidding on that one.
fake edit due to slow typing: oooooow, having to choose between prime Spielberg and Cameron though. Can I choose multiverse answer where we can have our cake and eat it too? I am far more nostalgic towards Cameron, but Spielberg has greater skill in the language of movies, which goes to selling them. Why Cameron then has the better track record of breaking the BoxOffice I honestly don't have an answer to.
real edit: maybe Cameron's are more atmospheric? He did say (in that little interview before people flipped on it and it went private) that his cuts are about two seconds longer than the industry average, so there is obviously more time to take them in. Also, he made a point to have shots in movies just because they're beautiful, not for plot or any other purpose. In that context, the shot in Avatar of the plushy things landing on main guy's body (which lasts like ten seconds or so, an eternity in modern film) comes to my mind, and it's best one in it, aside from the Colonel charging out: "masks on!" and holds his breath until someone brings him a mask. I was cheering for that guy.