BrassDragon
Member
I doubt they ditched their AK 47s
This would be unusual, not just for practical reasons. Used weapons like that are often revered in their circles and passed on to 'worthy warriors'.
I doubt they ditched their AK 47s
Do people forget the attacks in the late 60s and 70s?The clusterfuck that moron unleashed onto the world is going to haunt us for generations to come. It's crazy how much of today's issues with extremism can be traced not to 9/11 per se, but the senseless invasion of Iraq and Afghanistan. Going in without a plan and creating a power vacuum in the region was a sure way to destabilize the entire world.
They have safety to worry about. Prudence is sometimes good. This isn't even over.They should be publishing it uncensored now more than ever.
I doubt they ditched their AK 47s
I don't see a reason why we need to necessarily lose western culture or ideals as we lose our archaic ties to a religion that in the past was just as extreme and violent as some islamic sects seem to be right now.
I know you'd really like to make people believe the west should take some blame for this attack but it's not going to happen.
The Islamic extremists are the only ones to blame for this attack.
When North African, and other Muslim groups, are accepted in France it becomes infinitely harder to radicalize them. France has done a piss poor job in making people feel french.
You're missing an important point here, which is that it doesn't take into the account the positions muslims have in Western Europe these days (and I honestly don't know how it compares to the US situation).
Sky News just aired a lightly censored version of that video.
Gross. Can't believe they aired it.
Criticism of your beliefs is in fact a bad thing when your ideology declares other viewpoints challenging your own to be punishable by death. These people don't operate on the same liberal logic you do because their foundation for morality and understanding differs from your own.Man, all of this over a fucking cartoon. Those offended by the cartoon should understand that criticism of your beliefs is not a bad thing. And The cartoonists drawing Mohammed aren't even idolizing him. This is stupidity.
We will find out soon enough. if they ditched their Aks, they would be in the black car or nearbyWhy? They've changed cars at least once and have kept their identity hidden. They are intent on escaping without being identified. Without guns and a change of clothes they will just blend in.
I 100% agree with you.
When, however, the discussion starts to shift toward trying to blame islam or trying to castigate all muslims for this attack I find it necessary to point out that we share some responsibility in the continued radicalization of these people through our ignorant bigotry. (We and our being "the west" in large)
We all know that there will be no protests among Muslims, because people are too occupied with their daily lives and deep down they probably don't have too much sympathy for these cartoonists who have insulted deeply the most important aspect of their entire existence. This is just so hopeless and pointless. There will be no answers, just a growing divide and a clash of cultures.
Houellebecq is a major literary figure. His new book is very newsworthy.Seems like the outlet is basically the french version of Fox News but with their agendas often presented as satire. This is textbook fear mongering.
And their scope was largely limited before setting that firecracker off by invading Afghanistan and removing the Taliban from power. The Middle East and Afghanistan were simmering and the invasion turned the heat on, bringing it to a boil that ultimately spilt all over the place.
If it's not "all muslims", it most certainly ain't "we, the west" either.
We will find out soon enough. if they ditched their Aks, they would be in the black car or nearby
Add to that:
- the role of western cultural biases in the promulgation of ideas that further isolate already radical and isolated peoples.
Seems like the outlet is basically the french version of Fox News but with their agendas often presented as satire. This is textbook fear mongering.
But this is exactly the thing thats necessary to determine how far freedom of speech goes.
You should be able to say anything, no matter how stupid it is.
I hope moderates are able to stand behind these values without giving in to these anti muslim agendas themselfs.
Do people forget the attacks in the late 60s and 70s?
just woke up and read a few headlines, they escaped? thats pretty rare for an attack like this...
Unbelivable...i hope they are caught. And i hope this doesnt have an effect on MORE censorship
Sky News just aired a lightly censored version of that video.
Gross. Can't believe they aired it.
I 100% agree with you.
When, however, the discussion starts to shift toward trying to blame islam or trying to castigate all muslims for this attack I find it necessary to point out that we share some responsibility in the continued radicalization of these people through our ignorant bigotry. (We and our being "the west" in large)
Charlie Hebdo are left-leaning and anarchists. They make fun of all religions and all political figures (socialists included)
I think you're misunderstanding. The fearmongering book was published by someone else and the author was satirized by Charlie Hebdo. That's my understanding, at least.
This is absolutely true.Criticism of your beliefs is in fact a bad thing when your ideology declares other viewpoints challenging your own to be punishable by death. These people don't operate on the same liberal logic you do because their foundation for morality and understanding differs from your own.
This is nonsense. The west is not to blame for this at all. No religion is free from satire and mocking. That isn't a western culture bias. That is life. Everyone, of all religions needs to expect and not lose their mind to see their religious figures mocked.
stolen from reddit, one last's week cartoon drawn by someone who died today :
"Still no terrorist attack in France", and the terrorist says "Wait, we have until the end of january to present our wishes"
Is it really worse? Im pretty sure there were more attacks back then in the days of black September and the like. Highjackings happened all the time.No?
But only a fool would deny that the power vacuum that followed the invasion of Iraq and Afganithan allowed AQ to strenght itself and IS to fluorish. Islamic terrorism was nowhere as virulent in the 90's as it is now, and much of that is directly related to our actions there.
The petard was there and we lit it without any caution.
And their scope was largely limited before setting that firecracker off by invading Afghanistan and removing the Taliban from power. The Middle East and Afghanistan were simmering and the invasion turned the heat on, bringing it to a boil that ultimately spilt all over the place.
That I did not did. Don't put words in my mouth.
Spain.
What is a moderate Muslim? Simply not being violent?
I'm asking seriously because coming from the south of France (not living there anymore) I could see people getting fed up with Muslims in a general kind of way for a perceived behavior (notably towards women) even though these people weren't hurting anyone.
All in all I pretty much despise religions in general although I admire faith if that makes sense.
We are gradually desensitised, especially after controversies like beheading videos floating around on Facebook.
Lol it's our fault wackos are killing people over cartoons now? Just wowI find it necessary to point out that we share some responsibility in the continued radicalization of these people through our ignorant bigotry. (We and our being "the west" in large)
I didn't. I'm saying that there's occasions to be loud, and this is one of them.
Make those deluded criminals unworthy of carrying any motive resembling Islam. if there's silence, the message won't be heard enough. Again, that's how I feel. I don't have any particular faith and I wouldn't compare nutcases like that to life-respecting muslims that just follow their faith like any free human being.
All i'm saying is be loud and show them No prophet needed avenge from a petty cartoon. Censor them with a goodwill gesture, that's all I can say. This message rather than for the french society, would go for the perpetrators of the act. "You are no muslim, you're hiding behind a faith to commit crimes and disrespecting all we stand for, and the prophet stood for"
You are forgetting that the Islamic world actually did have a ~300 year golden age period where science and progression flourished. At this time they were way ahead of the Christian world on most fronts. It was primarily the Mongol Invasion and the Crusades that crushed most of their intellectual elite and halted Muslim enlightenment which gradually withered and gave root to extreme and fundamentalist forces.
You have to choose you're fights, I guess.
do they not have heavy security? i know charlie hebdo has been HEATED for a while now by radical muslims...
we just need to stop drawing mohammed. these people are obviously fucking crazy, and we need to show a little respect as well to their religion..
We all know that there will be no protests among Muslims, because people are too occupied with their daily lives and deep down they probably don't have too much sympathy for these cartoonists who have insulted deeply the most important aspect of their entire existence - the prophet and their religion. After all, earthly things pale in comparison to religion. This is just so hopeless and pointless. There will be no answers, just a growing divide and a clash of cultures.
Acceptance of what though in particular? Not showing and mocking the prophet Mohammad? Mocking of religion and anything "sacred" is very much at a core of western humor. I don't see how that could ever be expected to change.I think the west shares some of the blame for further isolation of a people who desperately need acceptance rather than blame.
That's the theme of many of the increasingly popular right wing parties and protests.
Sky News currently has Maajid Nawaz on from the Quilliam Foundation - he's kind of echoing that, saying moderate Islam themes are still problematic - with themes like blasphemy needing reform as it breeds the mindset which can lead to stuff like this.
It's not about us, it's about respect for the victims and their loved ones. Even if 100% of viewers are desensitised to it, it still shouldn't be aired.