So what? We can't talk about the religion of Islam generally? This is what I HATE about the current liberal paradigm. They even presented statistics and facts about the matter, and yet people still got their knickers in a bunch. In fact, the ONLY people presenting anecdotal evidence (which I think are still relevant, but it doesn't nullify statistics) were Ben Alleck and his compatriot. How about we have some introspection about one of the largest religions on the face of the earth? Is that not okay? Is there something inherently racist about that or something? It's okay to generalize when your generalization is coming from some sort of space that is reasonably substantiated. This liberal desire for there to be no generalizations ever is extremely peculiar and reeks of a sheltered academic theory that is disconnected from the real world. There would be no social science without generalizations. This whole line of argument is ludicrous to me.
So what?
What, is the point of what the hell i said in the first place. Which was replied with 'no, that didn't happen.' Statistics, again, have nothing to do with the comments they were making, nor do they have anything to do with Mahr's history of anti-arab/muslim/islam sentiment. Step up to the plate and be honest with yourself. Am I sitting here taking issue at the concept of generalizing? Am I crying because someone has been generalized? No, im being told that my eyes and ears were lying to me.That nothing of the sort happened. In case you missed it, I just replied that afleck responded to their gross generalizations, not hardly being a douchebag, as he was called for doing so.
Mahr is in it for the ratings, thats where his bigotry comes from. Comparing islam to a mafia, wasn't a poll. Nor was considering it the mother load of bad ideas. That wasn't data. The show was to rile up anti-islam sentiment. It wasn't productive in any way outside of backing up stereotypes to vilify a people, and selling whatever harris was onto sell or peddle.
Take your lame ass liberal smear campaign elsewhere. No group in this country is a good one. I'm not a liberal. I'm a black dude in the USA waiting for us to stop getting killed all the time, who want's people in the government representing citizens, not businesses, one who doesn't participate in the bullshit superbowl of liberals vs conservatives that your government wants you to have while they rob you all blind, and take away your rights and dignity. Thats my affiliation.
People want to pretend this was some sort of progressive segment. It wasn't. Sure, there was data. There were also a lot of ignorance spread. There is nothing wrong with noting both, instead of trying to pretend that Mahr has no history/no agenda with the subject, and that harris doesn't have a bias. Instead of defending their less, accurate, statements, they should be held to a standard where if they are trying to be productive, they won't alienate others off the bat. Wasn't productive. It was only to cheerlead the idea that Islam is bad, and muslims aren't doing anything about it.
I think we are on the same page, I'm not a generalizing defender. Just noted that it wasn't specifically what went down on the show, and it doesn't make someone a douchebag for noting bullshit on Mahrs show. Others will think, there was no bullshit on the show, and hes a douchebag. Thats fine -- but I'm going to stop it here as this thread isn't really about Mahr, Harris, or Afleck..