Religion is often self-serving in this aspect. People choose to believe what they align with. If it doesn't suit them, they either try to get it changed to reflect them, or they leave.
Pretty much everything in society is like this.
Religion is often self-serving in this aspect. People choose to believe what they align with. If it doesn't suit them, they either try to get it changed to reflect them, or they leave.
Can we stop talking about Ben Affleck and Sam Harris? Ben Affleck is an actor and celebrity while Sam Harris is a philosopher, intellectual, and has devoted a large part of life to studying religion... We don't need to be debating the merits of their argument ffs
Not even that unless you're driving or flying.No, just a state ID.
Last I checked you don't need any ID. You need a driver's license if you're driving, but there are other forms of transportation.No, just a state ID.
Then you're being disengenuous because I'm talking about gender and sexual equality within islam when I made that particular point.
Islam doesn't need extremists to show that it is backwards.
Do you need a passport if you travel within the United States?
https://twitter.com/BERLINER_KURIER/status/552872489614069760/photo/1
"No! You cant kill our freedom!"
Calling them that. Every journalist did that for four years and it didn't worked.
Ah Ok, I can't go by the interview then I have to go into the context of Harris' wider work?Maybe it is because I have a wider context on Harris because I am familiar with his work, but I am absolutely convinced that you have got him all wrong.
Gross, but brilliant.NSFW, Onion reporting in: http://www.theonion.com/articles/no-one-murdered-because-of-this-image,29553/
European elections are obviously the most likely place for Eurosceptic parties to do well, and even in those, no far right party came close to a majority of support in their own country, which would definitely be required to seize power.
It sure would be great if people stop judging religion based on the actions committed by fuck tard extremist.
Last I checked you don't need any ID. You need a driver's license if you're driving, but there are other forms of transportation.
They said that they were part of Al Qaeda in Yemen, shouted "that they avaenged the prophet".
Charlie Hebdo is known to have ruffle feathers with the mahomet caricature.
Or are you one of those smart guys that suspects the Mossad?
so what can be done against this scum?
smh. I have educated people enough here that its not. not going through the education process again. people just refuse to listen.
Perhaps you shouldn't have responded to someone making a point about nonviolence, then.
Germany and France for one. Greece is another. Serbia is another.
http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/nov/18/europe-angry-nationalist-eu-elections
http://theweek.com/article/index/26...o-end-nationalism-it-gave-it-new-life-instead
Not everyone on GAF is fluent in French Computer.
Am I the only one who's surprised that the (pseudo)islamist assassins abandoned their car right in the middle of the Jewish quarter, 290 meters away from the Michkenot Israël synanogue (6 rue Jean Nohain, 75019 Paris)? What a strange way to retreat, going somewhere that's 4 minutes away by foot - according to Google Map - from a place that's heavily guarded by the national security alert???"
Then you're being disengenuous because I'm talking about gender and sexual equality within islam when I made that particular point.
Islam doesn't need extremists to show that it is backwards.
They don't need to get the majority though. Just enough votes to force themselves in the government (like Heider in Austria years ago) or to actively block the functioning of the government on the back of a divided political scene like recently in Sweden.
Of course, not having majority means that the democracy is not fully in danger, but they could still have a negative influence on the public policies.
I think a religon can be bad in ways other than murder, though I can't speak on the Koran and the prophet Mohammed which forms the basis for your religion. I left my religion (Christianity) over the many terrible things in our holy book. I wouldn't mind seeing a debate on specifics of the religion's books. Would be interesting.The religion of Islam is absolutely awesome, it's the best thing that happened to me in life and I am a better person since becoming muslim. According to this religion it is unlawful to kill innocent people.
I am aware of that. I was commenting on traveling state to state in the US.you dont need ID while traveling through europe. only airtravel.
Calling SD racists and fascist?
Or how about his horrific statement that "“We are not at war with terrorism. We are at war with Islam.” Again not 'some version of Islam' ISLAM. Which he apparently can define completely and totally from his own fevered imagination which, for some reason, has more authority for you than what the opinion of actual muslims may be.
Even then, it's quite astonishing how often I've flown without showing any kind of ID. Maybe I just look trustworthyyou dont need ID while traveling through europe. only airtravel.
You don't need the actions of the extremists to show that it is backwards and regressive.
NSFW, Onion reporting in: http://www.theonion.com/articles/no-one-murdered-because-of-this-image,29553/
You've either not being paying attention, or you've chosen not to look.Are there islamic leaders decrying this foul action as immoral and sinful? I need to see that happen, record it and remind myself and others of it. I have never been given evidence that Islamic leaders condemn these actions.
Germany and France for one. Greece is another. Serbia is another.
http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/nov/18/europe-angry-nationalist-eu-elections
http://theweek.com/article/index/26...o-end-nationalism-it-gave-it-new-life-instead
Calling every voters that voted for them that. And yes, calling them fascist is stupid too as it water down the word. I don't see them as fascist, more like hardcore conservative.
"Spanish caricaturists: "And this is our gun"
Then how about the actual bad ideas of the religion. Lets discuss those.
Even then, it's quite astonishing how often I've flown without showing any kind of ID. Maybe I just look trustworthy
Just got tagged in fb video of them killing a guy, made me angry.
Are there islamic leaders decrying this foul action as immoral and sinful? I need to see that happen, record it and remind myself and others of it. I have never been given evidence that Islamic leaders condemn these actions.
I agree with you. But the (major) problem I have with SD is the representatives (majority of them what I can see) have a very telling background of being racist and fascist.
Their politics, on paper, isn't racist or so... it just ozing from the background though what they really want.
If you're not a citizen and flying in from another country, yes. After that you don't need one though IIRC
This is comparing travel in the EU to USA?
Yeah it's really sad. We don't see these people as muslims, no one I know will sympathize with those fucks since it's us they're hurting the most. Muslims have been able to live peacefully alongside jews and christians, on or outside muslim majority nations for a millenium so it's not a compatibility issue with western lifestyles. In Turkey they had hardcore laicist secularists in power for 100 years, the call to prayer was even changed to Turkish and no one got bombed or murdered over it.
Wahhabism is the root of all this evil fundementalism.
What?Says he's "well educated" - check
Says "motherlode of bad ideas" - check
Says "Muslims who don't support ISIS aren't serious about their faith" - nope,
Harris said:There are hundreds of millions of Muslims who are nominal Muslims who don’t take the faith seriously, who don’t want to kill apostates, who are horrified by ISIS
I criticize some Muslims all the damn time and some versions of Islam (to be specific... which people really should be and Harris completely isn't.. Extremist Salafism which is sometimes known as Wahhabism which is a pretty damn recent phenomenon in Islam). That's a far cry from criticizing 'Islam' in absurdly reductive simplistic terms as Harris does.Again, you have to be accepting of people criticizing your religion.
Ah Ok, I can't go by the interview then I have to go into the context of Harris' wider work?
OK. First let's say that at best Harris was manipulated by Affleck to fall into rhetorical traps JUST IN THAT INTERVIEW where he agreed that he is 'the person who understands the officially codified doctrine of Islam? (He) is the interpreter of that.'
And then instead of being specific and saying SOME VERSIONS of ISLAM he just mispoke by going full on general and attacked the whole thing when he said "Islam at the moment is the mother lode of bad ideas." (Not some versions of the thing. The whole damn thing.)
And then he wasn't actually serious when he said "here are hundreds of millions of Muslims who are nominal Muslims who don’t take the faith seriously, who don’t want to kill apostates, who are horrified by ISIS" So any muslim who doesn't want to kill apostates and isn't horrified by ISIS is a 'nominal muslim who doesn't take the faith seriously' Because HEY Sam Harris is the final authority on THAT.
LET'S JUST GIVE HIM THE BENEFIT OF THE DOUBT ON ALL OF THAT for some reason that I don't understand at all. Fine.
How about His fear-mongering easily debunked bullshit about MUSLIMS DEMOGRAPHICALLY TAKING OVER EUROPE as he does here?
http://www.samharris.org/site/full_text/the-reality-of-islam
"Islam is the fastest growing religion in Europe. The demographic trends are ominous: Given current birthrates, France could be a majority Muslim country in 25 years, and that is if immigration were to stop tomorrow."
Or how about his horrific statement that "“We are not at war with terrorism. We are at war with Islam.” Again not 'some version of Islam' ISLAM. Which he apparently can define completely and totally from his own fevered imagination which, for some reason, has more authority for you than what the opinion of actual muslims may be.
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2004/dec/1/20041201-090801-2582r/
There may be some things Harris says that appeal to you but why should that give him a free pass for when he turns around and says horrific irrational shit?
Sam Harris cannot be "manipulated" by someone like Ben Affleck. That made me laugh out loud. That's like Mini-Me trying to dunk on Shaq.
The specific quote you link to in the article needs some clarification. Here, Harris is saying that the US is claiming to be at war with "terrorism", but is actually at war with a certain form of extreme Islam. You conveniently left out the part where he says "we are not at war with all Muslims".
He doesn't say "horrific, irrational shit". He speaks a very carefully considered and worded argument, which you are interpreting to be an insult to your religion and fear-mongering. It isn't, it's just the facts.
Again, Sam Harris is one of the most level-head and unbigoted people you could ever hope to have a debate with. He only wants truth and reason, and for bad ideas to be questioned, as they should be.