It was just written in the Quran that after 1400 years to start massacring people including other Muslims.
Because "reliable" only means the results are statistically sound, not that they are based on stupid and/or biased questions. One poll reported once 20% of Germans "could think of" voting for right-wing AfD. In the end, they didn't even make the 5% threshold needed to get into parliament. Polls like this contain zero useful information.The poll is the poll and the result is the result. The reality might indeed be different (it often is), but people often use poll results to paint a picture or to add to a narrative, so I don't see why we should selectively use polls if they are from reliable sources.
Yeah you know that has nothing to do with context of what is going on in the world currently. It has nothing to do with the rising tensions between west and Muslims and the effects of what happened in the past half century or so.
It was just written in the Quran that after 1400 years to start massacring people including other Muslims.
For fucks sake, it seems everyone is missing the point.
Pol Pot didnt kill 2 million in a few years due to religion did he?
Did Stalinism kill 6 million due to religion?
300,000 Burundis were killed due to ethnicity between 1993 and 2005
270,000 Bangladeshis were killed due to politics during its separation
300,000 Killed in Sierra Leon Civil War atrocities
300,000 Killed in Darfur in ethnic cleansing since 2003
500,000 Ugandans were killed in Ethnic cleansing in 71-73
Up to 1 Million Rwandans were killed due to Ethnic cleansing in 1994
Maoist regime killed more than 30 million over his rise in China.
Don't tell me these deaths are due to religion. Stop the BS that its only religion that kills. its bigotry or ignorance. pick one
France should bring back guillotine just for these murderers.
Not by the defintion of extremist as being someone who takes extreme actions. But fine, if you have a semantic issue with 'extremist' than don't use it. But the basic point remains that a Sufi or a Shia or Ahmadi or etc. shouldn't be painted with the same brush due to the actions of some Wahhabi/Salafi. But that's exactly what happens when people refuse to be precise at all when speaking about 'Islam'.How is it not an abstract creation? If I can derive both "kill" and "don't kill" from the same set of rules, one of them being "extremist" is a superfluous description.
video seems the stuff right wing groups salivate over.
Europe should wake up to what?
All you've done is outline that people murder for lots of reasons. You've proved nothing
That would be to easy. They should rot in prison for the rest of their lives.France should bring back guillotine just for these murderers.
France should bring back guillotine just for these murderers.
And at the same time one in eight isn't even close to the percentage in Dresden - 18.000 with a population of 530.000 in Dresden alone.
The march in Cologne (4th biggest city in Germany) is said to be the last - 250 people showed up (out of a pop of over > 1 mill.).
Zen Buddhism was used to justify Japanese military aggression including things like kamikaze attacks during World War II.
http://www.japanfocus.org/-Brian-Victoria/3973
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zen_at_War
This is the right reaction right here. Terrorists killed 12 innocent people and they achieved nothing. We stick together.
France should bring back guillotine just for these murderers.
This is a rather weak publication to use in support of your point. Japanese nationalism leading to WWII is responsible for military aggression, not Zen Buddhism, your point is pretty narrow.
yeah, to see so many people in a place that tends to be progressive like gaf buying into "clash of cultures" horseshit is very disheartening.
yeah, there is more terrorism perpetrated by muslims right now than by christians. Y'all think the last 100 years might have something to do with that perhaps?
LOL did you change your avatar?
Reading the thread you would know the blame is the religion itself rather than the men, the argument being the religion itself tells these men to commit evil and the argument being if men were not religious, evil acts wouldnt occur
to fight fire with fire?
France should bring back guillotine just for these murderers.
now there is a hashtag, #killallmuslims. Someone tried ethnic cleansing before and that didn't work. These people are failing to learn from history and letting short sidedness take over
Reading the thread you would know the blame is the religion itself rather than the men, the argument being the religion itself tells these men to commit evil and the argument being if men were not religious, evil acts wouldnt occur
This is a rather weak publication to use in support of your point. Japanese nationalism leading to WWII is responsible for military aggression, not Zen Buddhism, your point is pretty narrow.
Are those in the name of the Buddha?
Pol Pot didnt kill 2 million in a few years due to religion did he?
Did Stalinism kill 6 million due to religion?
300,000 Burundis were killed due to ethnicity between 1993 and 2005
270,000 Bangladeshis were killed due to politics during its separation
300,000 Killed in Sierra Leon Civil War atrocities
300,000 Killed in Darfur in ethnic cleansing since 2003
500,000 Ugandans were killed in Ethnic cleansing in 71-73
Up to 1 Million Rwandans were killed due to Ethnic cleansing in 1994
Maoist regime killed more than 30 million over his rise in China.
Don't tell me these deaths are due to religion. Stop the BS that its only religion that kills. its bigotry or ignorance. pick one
The spontaneous and worldwide reaction is awe inspiring.
London
Vienna
Lyon
Rennes
Montreal - Radio Canada
AFP
Frankfurt
Israel
Tagesspiel
France should bring back guillotine just for these murderers.
People do evil things for all sorts of reasons, and a persons religion is one of them, whether you like it or not. Would the Jonestown residents have all killed themselves without their religion? Maybe, but it's highly doubtful.
That's literally the last thing we need to do.France should bring back guillotine just for these murderers.
You arrive at the same problem with all of the above as the one with "extremism". Superfluous descriptions. Islam is an incomplete and inconsistent philosophy and therefore all its interpretations are equal.Not by the defintion of extremist as being someone who takes extreme actions. But fine, if you have a semantic issue with 'extremist' than don't use it. But the basic point remains that a Sufi or a Shia or Ahmadi or etc. shouldn't be painted with the same brush due to the actions of some Wahhabi/Salafi. But that's exactly what happens when people refuse to be precise at all when speaking about 'Islam'.
No they shouldn't.
But thanks for your opinion.
You arrive at the same problem with all of the above as the one with "extremism". Superfluous descriptions. Islam is an incomplete and inconsistent philosophy and therefore all its interpretations are equal.
Because "reliable" only means the results are statistically sound, not that they are based on stupid and/or biased questions. One poll reported once 20% of Germans "could think of" voting for right-wing AfD. In the end, they didn't even make the 5% threshold needed to get into parliament. Polls like this contain zero useful information.
thats not what Quran says. it says clearly only those will commit acts of evil using religion who are evil. should i qoute that verse again?
This is the right reaction right here. Terrorists killed 12 innocent people and they achieved nothing. We stick together.
In their opinion, they were following their faith.as I asked the other poster. do you think the attackers today were "following their faith" or "distorting their faith". one choice
I don't know how you can even address this problem. People say education and prosperity, but these are people already living in France. The seem unable to accept the modern liberal world.
I'm not really a fan of increased surveillance and domestic spying on people but I really am at a loss for what else you can do.
I'm not really a fan of increased surveillance and domestic spying on people but I really am at a loss for what else you can do.
And someone else can quote a verse that says the opposite. AKA, my point.
The very last thing France should do is abandon any of its (civil/moral) values.
That's not what I said. Read my first sentence.If we're to go down the path of saying that polls don't contain any useful information, then surely those poll are just as useless as this one due to the fact that the majority of Muslims aren't engaged in extremist actions, even though the poll might suggest otherwise.