• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Tesla Model 3 will be revealed on March 31st

Status
Not open for further replies.

sfedai0

Banned
I actually disagree. I think that the Bolt looks like a traditional hatch which I like way more than the boring sedan look of the Model 3.

And this is why choices are good for consumers. Although, Im surprised anyone would find that design appealing. There a good looking hatches. That is not one.
 

Nafai1123

Banned
I actually disagree. I think that the Bolt looks like a traditional hatch which I like way more than the boring sedan look of the Model 3.

To each their own. Hatches don't say "$35k car" the way sedans do and the handling dynamics of a longer foot-printed RWD are more to my liking.
 
Ugh, I hope aesthetically dis-proportional vehicles are not the future.

I don't love the 3 design either but the S had it right with at least offering enough offsetting visual balance between the front and the rear end to not look awkward at many angles.

The future designs will make you feel uneasy. That is nature of progress.

As one of my teachers told me in car design school (yes. I actually went to one), if you feel totally comfortable with your design, you are not breaking any new ground.
 

Khayam

Banned
c0819299a83f921c0b80a497e5d57d3d7c51b716.png


3588d35c364931cb81ab65c730dbe8ec314e9824.png


2afee21e994431174d5d1c00cd6bb870a121a38c.png
 

mf.luder

Member
Interested in seeing the trunk open. The glass extends all the way down with no visible breaks but you can see breaks where the c-pillar normally is.
 

sfedai0

Banned
Those pics are great. If Tesla didnt design the car for maximum space and storage, we might have seen an even sexier design. As it is, its a baby S, which is what many people were hoping for anyways.
 
The future designs will make you feel uneasy. That is nature of progress.

As one of my teachers told me in car design school (yes. I actually went to one), if you feel totally comfortable with your design, you are not breaking any new ground.

The thing about the lack of grill criticism isn't that it's a vestige of a particular engine design.

To me, the criticism stems from the fact that for the most part, a car with a grill looks anthropomorphically correct. It has a "mouth". No grill means no "mouth" and that makes people uneasy because it looks less human.
 

Jonm1010

Banned
The future designs will make you feel uneasy. That is nature of progress.

Not sure I agree with that at all. Attractiveness is somewhat subjective and cultural, but not entirely.

That is why things like good architecture, good art and components of human beauty are timeless.

Plenty of new cars coming down the pipe are beautiful. For instance the Jaguar XE is a gorgeous vehicle. The Tesla S was jaw dropping to me on reveal. This? Not as much. But it isnt that far away from being beautiful with a few tinkerings. Whether they will happen or not is a different story.
 

sc0la

Unconfirmed Member
I noticed Elon said the 35k version has all the autopilot HARDWARE he didn't say you could use it at that price :p

Except the autopilot safety features (I assume auto rake to prevent imminent collisions) would be standard, he specified that.
 

Khayam

Banned
I didn't mind the look of the car at the unveiling but this pic here makes it looked like it was front and rear ended. Looks less appealing in this specific one.

I don't have that vibe and I find it amazing in this shot. It's sexier than what I saw live.
 
The thing about the lack of grill criticism isn't that it's a vestige of a particular engine design.

To me, the criticism stems from the fact that for the most part, a car with a grill looks anthropomorphically correct. It has a "mouth". No grill means no "mouth" and that makes people uneasy because it looks less human.

I do love designing a good facia on a car, and a face needs a mouth. Most would have designed a mouth, as Chevy Bolt team has done, for the sake of visual comfort. I applaud tesla team for saying fuck you to that.

Maybe a new paradigm for a facia design is needed in the age of electric car design. A big mouth has alway's been a car designers' favorite crutch in designing car facias.
 
Not sure I agree with that at all. Attractiveness is somewhat subjective and cultural, but not entirely.

That is why things like good architecture, good art and components of human beauty are timeless.

Plenty of new cars coming down the pipe are beautiful. For instance the Jaguar XE is a gorgeous vehicle. The Tesla S was jaw dropping to me on reveal. This? Not as much. But it isnt that far away from being beautiful with a few tinkerings. Whether they will happen or not is a different story.
Electric car design is a brand new thing. You can't use the same crutches you are use to in designing ICE cars. No hood vents and scoops, no big grilles, no cool tail-pipes, no NACA ducts, etc... I will miss those things but using them in electric car design is fundamentally ridiculous notion.
 

Flo_Evans

Member
I do love designing a good facia on a car, and a face needs a mouth. Most would have designed a mouth, as Chevy Bolt team has done, for the sake of visual comfort. I applaud tesla team for saying fuck you to that.

Maybe a new paradigm for a facia design is needed in the age of electric car design. A big mouth has alway's been a car designers' favorite crutch in designing car facias.

Again Porsche seems to manage fine with no huge gaping mouth.

It's funny to see this compared to the panamera though, that one does have a big grill and is fugly.
 

Bboy AJ

My dog was murdered by a 3.5mm audio port and I will not rest until the standard is dead
I reserved one as a gift. I hope they like it and that they don't see me as cheap because it's not the S.
 

strata8

Member
I didn't mind the look of the car at the unveiling but this pic here makes it looked like it was front and rear ended. Looks less appealing in this specific one.

There's no way around this unfortunately unless you want to compromise on practicality and interior space. The Model S avoids this because it's a much bigger car with more room to work with.

The other end of this extreme is the Fisker Karma. Possibly the most beautiful car ever made but it's classified as a subcompact despite taking up more room than most full-size cars.
 
I reserved one as a gift. I hope they like it and that they don't see me as cheap because it's not the S.

It's very futuristic. It also probably won't have a headphone jack, instead relying solely on Bluetooth for playing music from your iPhone to your car's stereo system.
 

Bboy AJ

My dog was murdered by a 3.5mm audio port and I will not rest until the standard is dead
It's very futuristic. It also probably won't have a headphone jack, instead relying solely on Bluetooth for playing music from your iPhone to your car's stereo system.
Bluetooth is so garbage. Perhaps Apple's new standard will be implemented. There's still time.
 

Nista

Member
I know if we ever got one, I'd have to get a wrap on the front with the mouth and fangs, that's darn cute.

The red one in the outdoor shot reminds me of our A3 with the black glass roof. Still hope this one is a success so they can get on with making the Roadster v2.
 
I do love designing a good facia on a car, and a face needs a mouth. Most would have designed a mouth, as Chevy Bolt team has done, for the sake of visual comfort. I applaud tesla team for saying fuck you to that.

Maybe a new paradigm for a facia design is needed in the age of electric car design. A big mouth has alway's been a car designers' favorite crutch in designing car facias.

The Model S and X both have mouths though. It seems strange that Tesla would start designing cars without mouths now, instead of with the earlier models.
 

elfinke

Member
The Model S and X both have mouths though. It seems strange that Tesla would start designing cars without mouths now, instead of with the earlier models.

My understanding of the S is that the mouth serves an aerodynamic and cooling purpose, so it has actual engineering reason for existing.
 

Flo_Evans

Member
Which Porsche? Mission E? That has a huge gaping mouth at the very bottom.

Porsche-Mission_E_Concept-2015-hd.jpg

I was thinking more 911s and caymans. It does look like the tesla does have a small opening (for battery cooling?) about the same size as the e.

I think it's more the strange "nose" shape of the tesla that is throwing me more than lack of a big mouth.
 
Bluetooth is so garbage. Perhaps Apple's new standard will be implemented. There's still time.

Bluetooth 3.0/4.0 have supported direct bitstreaming in the protocol for years now. It's up to the manufacturers of the Bluetooth transmitting and receiving devices to support it, so you can just bitstream your MP3/AAC/FLAC from your phone to the car which has the proper hardware to decode the bitstream and play it back. This is how DLNA works for instance, not that anyone uses it because of how awful that is.
 

Jonm1010

Banned
Electric car design is a brand new thing. You can't use the same crutches you are use to in designing ICE cars. No hood vents and scoops, no big grilles, no cool tail-pipes, no NACA ducts, etc... I will miss those things but using them in electric car design is fundamentally ridiculous notion.

Crutches? Bro, aesthetics are aesthetics. The Model 3, like every car before it, is designing their vehicles to be visually appealing.

There are certain hard and fast rules for that, other things are more subjective and require experimentation.

Just removing a grill is not some necessary shift, something radically new or the lack of me liking it is because I can't yet appreciate a car without a grill. I mean are you familiar with the Ford Model A? The BMW 700? Lets be serious here. Cars without grills were not invented by Elon Muck on March 31st 2016.
 
The future designs will make you feel uneasy. That is nature of progress.

As one of my teachers told me in car design school (yes. I actually went to one), if you feel totally comfortable with your design, you are not breaking any new ground.

Riiiiight...this design looks like it's will be outdated real fast.

Theres a lot of cars out right now that are gorgeous. The model 3 just look meh.

The design is not breaking new grounds at all, it's way too safe. A small model S with
out a grill...
 
I was thinking more 911s and caymans. It does look like the tesla does have a small opening (for battery cooling?) about the same size as the e.

I think it's more the strange "nose" shape of the tesla that is throwing me more than lack of a big mouth.

That ridge does feel like a vestige of a grille. It will probably disappear in the next model, lol.

BTW. GM's EV1 had no nothing.

1996-gm-ev1-1-medium-1200x750.jpg


Funny enough, the concept version had two huge intakes.

gm-impact-concept-1306404334-25.jpg
 
My understanding of the S is that the mouth serves an aerodynamic and cooling purpose, so it has actual engineering reason for existing.

Ah, I didn't realize that. Is there still a need for forced air through the engine compartment to cool something in these electric cars?

If you look at S to X to 3, you can see the mouth going, going, gone. It's evolution of a team's electric car design philosophy.

Yeah, I did notice that the S has a :O but the X has only a :mad:. The 3 is the first one which is just : though, it's not even :|
 
Riiiiight...this design looks like it's will be outdated real fast.

Theres a lot of cars out right now that are gorgeous. The model 3 just look meh.

The design is not breaking new grounds at all, it's way too safe. A small model S with
out a grill...

Their new ground is the proportion, and lack of grille. Those wheels are pushed out the edge, and the car looks like proportionally squeezed Model S. I haven't seen such proportions in production car. It's more akin to toy car proportions.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom