The New Hampshire Primary |Feb 9|: Live Free or Die

Status
Not open for further replies.
Marco Rubio
rubioattackadc6q78.gif

I'm dying if this is real. I need more context.
 
Jeb and Christie not dropping out
I don't see Christie staying in the race if he doesn't crack the top four or five. To pour all your resources into one state and then come out of with a sixth place finish? There's no momentum from that.

Agreed about Jeb though, he'll hold on to at least South Carolina. He's building up a big ground game there, plus has Graham's endorsement.
 
I'm hoping that Rubio's debate fuck up didn't lower expectations so much that a mediocre performance gets reported as a win. I can see the headlines now. "Despite debate, Rubio exceed expectations in NH, Trump first"

My dream order for this primary is
Trump
Cruz
Kasich
Jeb
Rubio

It would leave the party with no clear pick to destroy Trump, letting him continue to steamroll elsewhere. His lead needs to stay in Winner-Take-All South Carolina. Then the "Trump wins big in SC" headline can keep the narrative going.
 
I'm calling it now: when it comes time to actually vote, Trump supporters aren't going to materialize in the same huge numbers he's been getting in polls.
 
I'm calling it now: when it comes time to actually vote, Trump supporters aren't going to materialize in the same huge numbers he's been getting in polls.

They came out for him in Iowa without him having an actual ground game. I think they'll come out in NH. The primary process will benefit him more than the caucus.
 
I'm calling it now: when it comes time to actually vote, Trump supporters aren't going to materialize in the same huge numbers he's been getting in polls.

I expect you're right, reports are his ground game is somewhere between shit and nonexistent. However, I think his lead in New Hampshire is big enough that it will insulate him against a loss.
 
I'm calling it now: when it comes time to actually vote, Trump supporters aren't going to materialize in the same huge numbers he's been getting in polls.

I agree, but that's why I expect him to win NH with around an 8%-10% margin of victory instead of the large double-digit lead the polls give him
 
They came out for him in Iowa without him having an actual ground game. I think they'll come out in NH. The primary process will benefit him more than the caucus.

Yeah thats the thing about Iowa. Trump put in zero effort and got 2nd. Cruz fired off everything he had, dirty tricks and all, and he only won by a couple points. It should have been double digits. Cruz could not have been happy with the Iowa results.
 
I don't see Christie staying in the race if he doesn't crack the top four or five. To pour all your resources into one state and then come out of with a sixth place finish? There's no momentum from that.

Agreed about Jeb though, he'll hold on to at least South Carolina. He's building up a big ground game there, plus has Graham's endorsement.

Christie probably drops out if he completely bombs like that. He hasn't been polling great, but I suspect he outperforms his polling enough to stay in.

They came out for him in Iowa without him having an actual ground game. I think they'll come out in NH. The primary process will benefit him more than the caucus.

They came out, but not in the numbers his polling would have indicated. I doubt Trump gets as low as 8%, but he could easily be somewhere around 20% in New Hampshire.
 
They came out, but not in the numbers his polling would have indicated. I doubt Trump gets as low as 8%, but he could easily be somewhere around 20% in New Hampshire.

Caucus polling is historically hard to predict. 2012 had Santorum literally come out of nowhere (ew). NH polling has generally been more in line with the final results.
 
They came out, but not in the numbers his polling would have indicated. I doubt Trump gets as low as 8%, but he could easily be somewhere around 20% in New Hampshire.
A caucus works differently--you need to be at the site at 7 pm or your vote will not count, and even with high turnout you still just usually get less than 20% of registered voters participating.

You can vote all day in a primary, and New Hampshire traditionally has high participation rates.
 
They came out for him in Iowa without him having an actual ground game. I think they'll come out in NH. The primary process will benefit him more than the caucus.

Trump will win in NH, but his ground game isn't any different there -- nor will it be any different anywhere else, since he isn't interested in changing things up.

Caucus polling is historically hard to predict. 2012 had Santorum literally come out of nowhere (ew). NH polling has generally been more in line with the final results.

NH is usually even harder to poll accurately.
 
I did my civic duty this morning on the way to the office. The bad part is that I live in the largest (or second largest) city and my district voting district was empty. I mean, it literally took me about 5 mins total to run into the school, vote and leave. I hope that small snowstorm yesterday doesn't keep people away from the polls...
 
A caucus works differently--you need to be at the site at 7 pm or your vote will not count, and even with high turnout you still just usually get less than 20% of registered voters participating.

You can vote all day in a primary, and New Hampshire traditionally has high participation rates.

There is no party registration in NH. You could have a slate of moderates you expect to vote for Clinton go vote for Kasich instead.

Probably part of the reason that Clinton won NH in '08 was a swath of Obama supporters went to throw support behind McCain, even though these same people voted for Obama in the general.

NH is a boondoggle. The only thing we really know is Sanders will win.

We also had a dusting here in NYC, so I imagine NH got hit with a decent amount of snow last night. So, we'll see what that does to Trump and Sanders support. Since traditional non-voters and young voters are generally the most likely to no-show after intending to votes.
 
Caucus polling is historically hard to predict. 2012 had Santorum literally come out of nowhere (ew). NH polling has generally been more in line with the final results.

I'm pretty sure the latter isn't true. New Hampshire polling has historically been all over the place, sometimes with things changing at the very last second that polls just don't pick up.
 
There is no party registration in NH. You could have a slate of moderates you expect to vote for Clinton go vote for Kasich instead.

Probably part of the reason that Clinton won NH in '08 was a swath of Obama supporters went to throw support behind McCain, even though these same people voted for Obama in the general.

NH is a boondoggle. The only thing we really know is Sanders will win.
I am talking about whether his supporters will not show up. He certainly underperformed due to the caucus format and lack of a get out the caucus system.

There is party registration in NH, but 40% are undeclared. I think Hillary voters will vote for Hillary since her ground game has been trying to narrow the gap and they've been pushing the vote hard. I don't think Kasich would capture all of these defectors--as we see in this thread, Trump is capturing a lot of Democratic votes because they think he will be easy to beat in the general:

All my friends and family live in NH.

My friend are all left leaning and like Sanders but are registered independent and plan to vote in the Republican primary for Trump since they think he will be easiest to beat in November. I asked why they aren't voting Sanders and they said the polls make him look like a sure thing. I think only one or two liberal friends I know are actually voting for Sanders out of around 20.

Family members are mostly voting for kaisch except grandmother voting for Clinton.
 
Trump will win in NH, but his ground game isn't any different there -- nor will it be any different anywhere else, since he isn't interested in changing things up.

I agree here. I just think it matters less in an actual primary opposed to a caucus with strict voting rules.

NH is usually even harder to poll accurately.

Eh, they've been a little off but I think that's just noise from independents deciding on random candidates at the last minute like they always do.

2012 poll aggregate on final day: Romney 39.6%, Paul 18.8%, Huntsman 11.9%, Santorum 11.0%

2012 results: Romney 39.28%, Paul 22.89%, Huntsman 16.89%, Santorum 9.43%

2008 poll aggregate: McCain 34.2%, Romney 27.5%, Huckabee 12.0%, Giuliani 8.3%

2008 results: McCain 37.01%, Romney 31.57%, Huckabee 11.22%, Giuliani 8.54%
 
Trump, Kasich, Bush, Cruz, Rubio in that order.

My hope and hell, my somewhat optimistic prediction as well.

Let's make it happen, Cap'n!
 
So is Kasich going to be this week's flavor of the week until he messes up and gets bumped back down, like Rubio?

How did Kasich go from being that random guy nobody had heard of at the debate, to being potentially second in a primary?
 
So is Kasich going to be this week's flavor of the week until he messes up and gets bumped back down, like Rubio?

How did Kasich go from being that random guy nobody had heard of at the debate, to being potentially second in a primary?

Kasich has always been much more well suited to New Hamshire's demographic of Republicans than anyone else save for Christie.
 
We also had a dusting here in NYC, so I imagine NH got hit with a decent amount of snow last night. So, we'll see what that does to Trump and Sanders support. Since traditional non-voters and young voters are generally the most likely to no-show after intending to votes.


It really wasn't a lot of snow (3-6") and it was done snowing late last night, so there is no excuses at all! It was kind of sad to see nobody at the polls at 7:30am...
 
I thought Rubio was the Republican Obama.

The GOP seems to have wanted him to be, but he blew it. He lacks the charisma that Obama has. Obama just oozed leadership. You knew right away, "this man will be president" when Obama spoke. No candidate on either side matches that feeling that Obama gave people, which I find disappointing.
 
My shot in the dark for top three is:
-Trump
-Kasich
-Cruz

I can't see Cruz in second after the Carson fiasco, but it seems like he hasn't dropped that much. I think moderates/establishment from Rubio will flock to Kasich and can't see Rubio win over him or even Bush. Wouldn't surprise me if Christie finishes ahead of Rubio.
 
Looking for Trump to hand down a devastating blowout tonight. I think Christie and Fiorina will dropout and both endorse Trump after tonight.

Im hoping Rubio gets beaten by Trump by at least 3x so i can see the look on GOPe's face when reality sets in that its Trump or bust.

That reaction from Jeb when he has to come out and say "Trump is better than Clinton, please vote for Trump" is going to be meme worthy.
 
Looking for Trump to hand down a devastating blowout tonight. I think Christie and Fiorina will dropout and both endorse Trump after tonight.

Im hoping Rubio gets beaten by Trump by at least 3x so i can see the look on GOPe's face when reality sets in that its Trump or bust.

That reaction from Jeb when he has to come out and say "Trump is better than Clinton, please vote for Trump" is going to be meme worthy.

I'd be a little surprised if they drop out. Well, Fiorina maybe, but I think Christie is in until he's out of money. Hell, most of these candidates will be, I think.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom