phantomspiker
Member
Sunless Sea is a great game, glad to see it getting some recognition.
Did you even bother to check who wrote the piece? And find out anything about his history of gaming?
I mean, come on. The fact that you don't know Simon Parkin says more about you than your silly perception of the New Yorker.
Darkest Dungeon is out? Oh hellllll yes!
In which case, what does the supposed elitism have to do with the author?I didn't say anything about the writer. I'm talking purely about the publication in general. They employ very intelligent people who are generally good writers, but as a whole I often find the New Yorker very elitist. I know there are fantastic articles, maybe even gaming related ones, but that's just how I view the publication. So, upon seeing that they have a best games of 2015 list I was curious, and while it was heavily indie/artistic game focused, I was expecting basically no AAA games which was incorrect.
And who is Simon Parker and why should I seemingly be ashamed to not know who he is?
Simon Parkin![]()
Shooters: How Video Games Fund Arm Manufacturers
The boy who stole Half-Life 2
The Videogame Invasion of Iraq
Who killed Rare?
That cancer game
Who spilled Hot Coffee
Blurred lines: Are YouTubers breaking the law?
Gaming Your Brain: How video game companies are making a science of turning your data into profit
Winners might use drugs
And more
Hipster click bait list.
I didn't say anything about the writer. I'm talking purely about the publication in general. They employ very intelligent people who are generally good writers, but as a whole I often find the New Yorker very elitist. I know there are fantastic articles, maybe even gaming related ones, but that's just how I view the publication. So, upon seeing that they have a best games of 2015 list I was curious, and while it was heavily indie/artistic game focused, I was expecting basically no AAA games which was incorrect.
And who is Simon Parker and why should I seemingly be ashamed to not know who he is?
THis.
It's funny that the elitists can even crawl into the gaming space.
No witcher? What????
If that was the case they should've named it "our favorite video games of 2015"
not "the best"
You guys going all ape shmidt over Ori doesn't make sense to me. It is just a very solid Metroidvania with amazing production values. I liked it a lot and forgot it the second it was over.
List is really good of the games I played and I now have to play all the ones on there I haven't heard of yet.
I see we have many unanswered prayers to Salt in this thread.
I think by elitist he means writes meaningful pieces instead of behaving like BuzzFeed or The Huffington Post.So wait you agree that it's an excellent publication that has great content and hires fantastic writers... but... it's elitist?
What does that even mean?
Hipster list?
They're working on a Sunless Sea expansion that takes you to the world under the water's surfaceThere are flaws but coming from Echo Bazaar, Failbetter's web based game, it's great to see they are evolving the setting and they are doing it on their own terms. I am excited to see if they will release another game in a different genre/format.
Edit: The different genre/format being a true rpg given how character driven EB is.
So wait you agree that it's an excellent publication that has great content and hires fantastic writers... but... it's elitist?
What does that even mean?
In which case, what does the supposed elitism have to do with the author?
Simon Parker is one of the better writers in the industry. Ex-Eurogamer (freelances there on occasion still), also done work for EDGE, Guardian and even wrote a book (Death By Video Game). The dude has like a bajillion reviews to his name. He's no chump posing as knowledgable about games.
List of some good stuff posted earlier:
That game cuts really deep.fuck I really have to play The Beginner's Guide.
How on Earth is Everybody's Gone to the Rapture on that list?
Did you read the article? The author explains the rationale for his list.By no means a bad list.
But I would suggest the writing in W3 is among the very best (if not the best) in any AAA game. So somewhat odd for the New Yorker of all outlets to snub it.
It may be difficult to fathom, but people may have different opinions than youHow on Earth is Everybody's Gone to the Rapture on that list?
Because the writer liked it enough to put it on the list. Does that hurt your feelings?
It may be difficult to fathom, but people may have different opinions than you
"Hidetaka Miyazakis latest finds treasure within cliché. The aesthetic is familiar gothic horror. The diseased town of Yharnam, with its blood-slicked cobblestones, flickering oil lamps, and spindly iron fencing, is inhabited by assorted eldritch monstersrabid Dobermans, hoe-wielding peasants, fat Hitchcockian crowswhich you attack using a Victorian blade-cum-blunderbuss. The games structure, however, is idiosyncratic. As in Miyazakis earlier games, Yharnam pieces together like a grand and elegant contraption, interlocking in unexpected but pleasing ways via corridors and ladders. The directors interest in arcane storytelling, told in half-whispers by the characters you meet and the props you find, captivates, as does the games combat. Bloodborne subverts the prevailing wisdom that contemporary video games must mollycoddle their players and quash mystery."
New Yorker never disappoints. They have such interesting writers.
And? You're not seeming to get it. It doesn't matter if you felt there was no gameplay or the only strength were in the storytelling. It doesn't matter if you thought it was the worst game of the year.It had its moments, but purely from a storytelling perspective. The gameplay... was there gameplay?
It had its moments, but purely from a storytelling perspective. The gameplay... was there gameplay?
Not until January. But like he says, it's already more complete than many games. Definitely one of the better EA titles ever, along with Kerbal of all things.
I liked that it didn't bother with something just to fit in with everything else. I figured that the whole point of the thing was for me to absorb the whole thing on my own, and let me deal with it personally instead of putting in gameplay as an itch to scratch.It had its moments, but purely from a storytelling perspective. The gameplay... was there gameplay?
It's a guy's personal preferences. The offended responses in this thread are HYSTERICAL. Seriously rethink what you're doing.
I liked that it didn't bother with something just to fit in with everything else. I figured that the whole point of the thing was for me to absorb the whole thing on my own, and let me deal with it personally instead of putting in gameplay as an itch to scratch.