plasmawave
Banned
That Matrix review was super nitpicky. I'm disappoint.
Tamara's sunken cheek joke was funny.
Tamara's sunken cheek joke was funny.
Doug misses the actual big plothole of the movie, not why the Matrix is needed but how and why humanity is kept as living batteries in the first place.
Morpheus explains that to Neo when he shows him what the Matrix is. Basically, the machines needed power and found a way to harness energy from our biomass "mixed with a form of fusion".
Morpheus explains that to Neo when he shows him what the Matrix is. Basically, the machines needed power and found a way to harness energy from our biomass "mixed with a form of fusion". People who were kept without an active mind died prematurely, hence the simulation. It's fine if you want more of an explanation than that...but it's in no way a plot hole.
Why did they need our power specifically? It's explained further in the Animatrix if you want details. But there is a higher level thematic reason why they use us. It's to explore the relationship between humans and the machines we create, and this theme follows through the whole trilogy.
Which is just about the dumbest SF idea in a film in the last 20 years. The idea that you can make a perpetual energy source out of feeding people to people + 'fusion' somehow is just dumb. Biomass has no use in fusion as an energy source. We're made of heavy atoms, you use light ones in fusion (and produce heavy atoms).
And the sequels basically retcon the idea anyways. The machines did it for revenge. This is actually the best thing about them.
That Matrix review was super nitpicky. I'm disappoint.
Tamara's sunken cheek joke was funny.
So? Maybe this futuristic form of fusion can use biomass or bioelectric energy in some way. Why does this technical detail need so much explaining? We don't need a paragraph of technobabble to understand what is happening. And good sci-fi doesn't require it either. Hell, sometimes you can just make shit up like in Jurassic Park. Just splice the DNA, duh!
I don't want to see Doug as a dick, but lying to Phelous about his effects was a pretty lame thing to do on his part.
It's worse and more visible when he is out of character, I especially get annoyed at his mistake videos when he is lacking any sincere kind of apology or insight in his mistakes and just defends himself. A bit of humbleness really wouldn't hurt him in general.He's never been a super-perfect person, even in his reviews, so I can actually see it. That kind of presence, backing and fame like Doug skyrocketed to can screw a person up as time goes.
The first Matrix movie is great because it is a kickass action movie with style coming out of every orifice. It is a simple as that. "Symbolism"/"meaning" is what ruined the sequels, but in the first one it is a complete throwaway.
Does he at least say "Zuul, mothafucka, Zuuuul!" in the review/nitpickery?
Oh god the sketches are grating.
Do people actually like them or does Doug not give a fuck what his audience thinks?
Because clearly one quality of sketch determines the quality of all sketches.
It is finally launching in March, from what has leaked from the behind the scenes, been a bit of a disaster.
I bet Doug & co. really want to get this right. His last ambitious project cost them in a big way and Channel Awesome is apparently falling apart. I haven't seen any of their material in a long, long time.
Lupa did not paint the best picture of the production.
I wish Doug didn't gloss over so many of the fights and instead critiqued them as fights to see whether or not they served any purpose. After all, Reloaded is first and foremost an action movie. As in, the whole initial draw of the film are the action sequences, so I don't entirely agree with his "Ugh..another action sequence in my action movie?" approach. That first fight at the beginning was a great way to show the audience right off the bat just how much Neo has grown as a fighter since the first film. He can take on three agents - the baddest bad guys from the first film - all at once without breaking a sweat. It's a fairly short brawl as well, only lasting a minute or two.
yeah, doug isn't really good for actual analysis. he's good (when he's good) for making fun of bad things. or weird things.
a matrix series introspection seems more up lindsay ellis's alley, or a half-in-the-bag style thing. these just don't seem his style.
Man, interesting drama over there, huh? This reads as if the people behind the scenes are e a little unequipped to manage what they had while also being equally prickish.
Who said it was just one?
Every episode I find myself internally screaming
![]()
every time they cut to a sketch. I just want the review mate. That's what made NC so big. Not the fucking sketches.
But like I said though, there are good sketches and bad sketches. Good ones won't make you go "get on with it". Good ones are like in Food Fight. Bad ones are like in Jurassic Park III.
And you make it sound like his old reviews don't have them. They have them.
and there's more: http://imgur.com/a/K8Xe4
So I used to watch Doug on and off, I think I have a love/hate relationship with his style. Just checked out the new site and holy hell is it even more on an unnavigatable mess than it used to. What the hell happened?