Which is probably why it's as high as it is; actual players have been beating it for the DLC and rightfully so.
I just don't want reviewers to take a piss on Bloodborn for no good reason; that's the one of the three easiest for them to do it on.
Something that should've been happening years ago. These guys can't slander a game that doesn't deserve it without paying the price.
Anyhow I've said my piece for the night; Order got picked apart like a carcass and it may have deserved it. But Bloodborn is looking like a healthy buck; vultures don't go after healthy bucks.
So if Bloodborn comes out like a dead carcass once the reviews are done it's going to look like one of those vultures surprised it with a bad meal and gunshots to both legs before it went out for its time in the desert (as all games do).
I don't know. We don't know the final quality of the game, but most journalists seem very positive and excited in the previews of Bloodborne ( I can't think of too many positive The Order previews). I mean there could be worries about franchise fatigue, but I think the new setting and different weapons will really help that. I really doubt they'll piss on it unless the reviewer just doesn't like the Souls games in general.