I got banned for 2 weeks for saying this game would get raped by reviews lmao
What other high budget movie games have they funded?
I love you ElTorro.
I got banned for 2 weeks for saying this game would get raped by reviews lmao
I got banned for 2 weeks for saying this game would get raped by reviews lmao
A statement saying what tho?
Great visuals do not make a good game.Now that's ridiculous. The graphics alone give it minimum score of 3/5.
I got banned for 2 weeks for saying this game would get raped by reviews lmao
Now WHO didn't see this coming? It became very clear this was going to suck since they started talking about the "gameplay", especially after this interview that has mind boggling quotes like:
"were still restricted to the archaic nature of the video game with its need for gameplay"
and this gem:
"were not going to fall for the trap of trying to create interesting mechanics when we could be spending that time focusing on the character animations."
Not to mention that every demo/trailer that they showed was always bad, but people were always trying finding excuses saying that the next one would be better (lol), or that it was a really old demo (after the mild reaction from the press in that preview event that they held)
It's funny how no one can tell or even give examples of next gen gameplay but games are docked points for being last gen.
So stupid, are we supossed to expect current games to reinvent gaming conventions every year? Can't open world, corridor racers, linear games, cinematic games, etc. coexist? It seems as of some reviewers get caught up in the flavor of the month trends and condemn games that don't follow those trends.
Not only in this particular case mind you.
Now WHO didn't see this coming? It became very clear this was going to suck since they started talking about the "gameplay", especially after this interview that has mind boggling quotes like:
"we’re still restricted to the archaic nature of the video game with its need for gameplay"
and this gem:
"we’re not going to fall for the trap of trying to create interesting mechanics when we could be spending that time focusing on the character animations."
Not to mention that every demo/trailer that they showed was always bad, but people were always trying finding excuses saying that the next one would be better (lol), or that it was a really old demo (after the mild reaction from the press in that preview event that they held)
"first impressions thread" tells another story about this game...Which one is correct ?
Now that's ridiculous. The graphics alone give it minimum score of 3/5.
Positive review from one of my favorite podcast...
http://www.psnation.com/2015/02/19/review-the-order-1886-ps4/
Yet people have time and time again tried to say that it isn't. "There is more to it", "we've only seen cutscenes so far", "of course it's short if you just run through it", etc.Are people honestly shocked at these review scores? We've known it was an overly cinematic game since E3 last year. Every preview pointed it out.
Probably referring to Quantum Dream.
From my point of view, the system has delivered in spades, as I have had a plenty of fun with the exclusive titles of all sizes. Currently counting seven of them, and eight multiplatforms in my library. It's all down to a matter of taste in games.
You don't seem to grasp why you were banned in the first place.
Now WHO didn't see this coming? It became very clear this was going to suck since they started talking about the "gameplay", especially after this interview that has mind boggling quotes like:
"we’re still restricted to the archaic nature of the video game with its need for gameplay"
and this gem:
"we’re not going to fall for the trap of trying to create interesting mechanics when we could be spending that time focusing on the character animations."
Not to mention that every demo/trailer that they showed was always bad, but people were always trying finding excuses saying that the next one would be better (lol), or that it was a really old demo (after the mild reaction from the press in that preview event that they held)
Lol almost feel bad for the devs, all the stuff about bullying and what not only for the mob to be "proven right" with these reviews.
I got banned for 2 weeks for saying this game would get raped by reviews lmao
Now that's ridiculous. The graphics alone give it minimum score of 3/5.
Like how MCC got 9's when it deserved 5's?
Can we stop parroting fake interviews from satire/parody sites? That's be great, thanks.Now WHO didn't see this coming? It became very clear this was going to suck since they started talking about the "gameplay", especially after this interview that has mind boggling quotes like:
"we’re still restricted to the archaic nature of the video game with its need for gameplay"
and this gem:
"we’re not going to fall for the trap of trying to create interesting mechanics when we could be spending that time focusing on the character animations."
Not to mention that every demo/trailer that they showed was always bad, but people were always finding excuses saying that the next one would be better (lol), or that it was a really old demo (after the mild reaction from the press in that preview event that they held)
impressions from fellow gaffers is the only unbiased way
we live in a world were games like the MCC and AC Unity get rewarded critically despite being sloppy, half hearted mediocre efforts.
meanwhile the order 1886, despite being a polished, bug free product gets dragged through the mud.
God of War, Uncharted and Last of Us are all very cinematically driven games in a lot of ways, but those all have fun core gameplay. I sort of would like to see Sony mix it up a bit more on the 1st party side and maybe they are. Bloodborne is next month and not really like anything else Sony has put out recently.
People are only allowed positive points of view?
What in the fuck? Why would anyone support a team that says shit like this? You're making fucking video games.Now WHO didn't see this coming? It became very clear this was going to suck since they started talking about the "gameplay", especially after this interview that has mind boggling quotes like:
"were still restricted to the archaic nature of the video game with its need for gameplay"
and this gem:
"were not going to fall for the trap of trying to create interesting mechanics when we could be spending that time focusing on the character animations."
Not to mention that every demo/trailer that they showed was always bad, but people were always finding excuses saying that the next one would be better (lol), or that it was a really old demo (after the mild reaction from the press in that preview event that they held)