Holy shit at 3 hours of gameplay. How does a studio pitch such an idea tin he first place and how does Sony sign off on such? That's what I really want to know,
Hahahaha, if Hitler in downfall meme was the voice of people against companies, Risitas is the voice of the companies doing shitty practices.
Its so funny knowing him for TV and spanish to know he is talking about making a paella, and in reality the subs are talking about shitty practices.
This interview (and others) are already famous in Spain because the guy (and his brother in law RIP ) makes no sense when telling stories, but this just elvates it to god status.
I wouldn't be surprised that the reviewers were scared to grade both Halo and AC with a low score.
Does Wolfenstein qualify as this type too? No multiplayer but universally liked. imo it was how single player games should be done.
5 from Gamekult.
http://www.gamekult.com/jeux/test-the-order-1886-J3050151450t.html#ps4
Seems fair. They're saying 6 hours length (3h gameplay, 3h cinematics), but the most important point they're making is that other than the technical aspects, all other aspects are dated, from story to stealth, gunfights, QTE and plot twists. Ouch.
They do if they wanted to be rated along with their peers. When I get buy another game at the same pricepoint and the only redeeming feature of one is 'pretty graphics' whereas the other has multiple modes and reasons to keep playing the game then the choice should be pretty easy.Not all games need tacked on multiplayer, co-op or stupid unlockables. Also the multiple playthroughs thing is a ridiculous complaint. Not necessary either. If these are the only complaints with the game I'm going to buy it once it goes on sale.
I couldn't care less about a game not having new game + , i understand people other than me do, but it should have no effect on the score of the game IMO.
It's a cover based shooter? I like those, I don't care if other games have done it before
It's disturbing that I want my $60 game to work? That I don't have to wait for patch after patch for performance fixes?
That alone makes this game better than other recent AAA games
So, uhhh, how did the people on GAF that got the game early take 12 hours to beat it?
If a steak that costs $100 but is also a sportscar made out of diamonds drives out of a movie theater at 20MPH, and a sedan hamburger that is 40 hours long and open world drives out of a McDonald's at 70MPH, when will the two meet and what will the score be
I'm trying to figure out the proper analogies here
If a steak that costs $100 but is also a sportscar made out of diamonds drives out of a movie theater at 20MPH, and a sedan hamburger that is 40 hours long and open world drives out of a McDonald's at 70MPH, when will the two meet and what will the score be
I'm trying to figure out the proper analogies here
If a five hour steak that costs $100 but is also a sportscar made out of diamonds drives out of a movie theater at 20MPH, and a sedan hamburger that is 40 hours long and open world drives out of a McDonald's at 70MPH, when will the two meet and what will the score be
I'm trying to figure out the proper analogies here
has the GAF impression thread given any indication that this was going to review so low?
Knack, Killzone, Driveclub and now this.. Sony is on fire with their exclusives.
Knack, Killzone, Driveclub and now this.. Sony is on fire with their exclusives.
Knack, Killzone, Driveclub and now this.. Sony is on fire with their exclusives.
If a five hour steak that costs $100 but is also a sportscar made out of diamonds drives out of a movie theater at 20MPH, and a sedan hamburger that is 40 hours long and open world drives out of a McDonald's at 70MPH, when will the two meet and what will the score be
I'm trying to figure out the proper analogies here
They knew this was coming. Standard industry practice is that a few months before launch the studio or the publisher has mock-reviews done by game journalists so they have an idea of how well their game is going to do. Then they base their preorder and sell-through projections off those reviews (and a couple of other factors).
Graphics?
No dips in frame rate
Interesting characters
Sounds like a good story line?
3rd person shooter
That's all the pro's I need
Our (PlayStation LifeStyle) review: http://www.playstationlifestyle.net...6-review-interactive-19th-century-cinema-ps4/
8/10 -- a score it definitely deserves. Most people won't like it since it doesn't have any online component, or any social features and is not a sandbox game. But it's fine by me. Narrative-driven, with amazing audio/visual work? Yep, it's The Order.
Bottom line is: reviews will be super polarized depending no who reviewed it. If they're a fan of games like Heavy Rain, go pick it up. If not, then don't bother. It won't change your mind.
Hahahaha, if Hitler in downfall meme was the voice of people against companies, Risitas is the voice of the companies doing shitty practices.
Its so funny knowing him for TV and spanish to know he is talking about making a paella in the beach, and in reality the subs are talking about shitty practices.
This interview (and others) are already famous in Spain because the guy (and his brother in law RIP ) makes no sense when telling stories, but this just elvates it to god status.
I don't have any issue with them scoring The Order so low; my issue with game reviews is that they have zero standards. Halo MCC should not have gotten a 8/10 or 9/10. It is fucking broken, the end. MP is a huge part of Halo and it's inexcusable that it launched broken. Period. I don't give a fuck that the SP works, SP it at best 50% of the Halo experience. MCC was a rush hack job slapped together by 3 separate studios. The series was not given the love it deserved. That the SP is "playable" should be the minimum acceptable bar, not something to be lavished with praise from almost every game journalist. I am a Halo fan, they never should have released the product the way they did and the fact that Microsoft went ahead and did it anyway... they should have been raked over the coals by "professional" game journalists. So you played it in a special reviewers enclave, I don't give a fuck for your excuses. Go back and amend you reviews you fucks. And not to 8/10
I would love for you to keep us in the loop on this because I feel it might be the opposite. I think it just might get enough positive word of mouth to maintain some momentum.
If a five hour steak that costs $100 but is also a sportscar made out of diamonds drives out of a movie theater at 20MPH, and a sedan hamburger that is 40 hours long and open world drives out of a McDonald's at 70MPH, when will the two meet and what will the score be
I'm trying to figure out the proper analogies here
I actually don't wanna dig through 37 pages to see if it was already posted, but the subtitles and the laughter in this video kill me:
"Interview" with a Ready at Dawn-developer
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FV-u5tvQC34
This somehow makes me hungry and my teeth hurt at the same timeIf a five hour steak that costs $100 but is also a sportscar made out of diamonds drives out of a movie theater at 20MPH, and a sedan hamburger that is 40 hours long and open world drives out of a McDonald's at 70MPH, when will the two meet and what will the score be
I'm trying to figure out the proper analogies here
People are about to compare this game's reviwes to racism arent they?
Arrogant Sony is back baby!
And my beloved "I have a PS4..." It's like starting a sentence with "I'm not racist but..."
If a five hour steak that costs $100 but is also a sportscar made out of diamonds drives out of a movie theater at 20MPH, and a sedan hamburger that is 40 hours long and open world drives out of a McDonald's at 70MPH, when will the two meet and what will the score be
I'm trying to figure out the proper analogies here
If a five hour steak that costs $100 but is also a sportscar made out of diamonds drives out of a movie theater at 20MPH, and a sedan hamburger that is 40 hours long and open world drives out of a McDonald's at 70MPH, when will the two meet and what will the score be
I'm trying to figure out the proper analogies here
Do you guys think RAD is surprised by the score this game is getting in reviews? Sometimes when you make something you value it higher than others.
Or do you think they expected this but decided to cut their loses?
Do you guys think RAD is surprised by the score this game is getting in reviews? Sometimes when you make something you value it higher than others.
Or do you think they expected this but decided to cut their loses?