• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

The Vogons of Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy!

Status
Not open for further replies.

ManaByte

Gold Member
hitchhikers-guide-to-the-galaxy-the-20050209041404556.jpg

hitchhikers-guide-to-the-galaxy-the-20050209041405400.jpg

hitchhikers-guide-to-the-galaxy-the-20050209041405791.jpg

hitchhikers-guide-to-the-galaxy-the-20050209035515848-001.jpg


Super high-res images at this link: http://filmforce.ign.com/hhgttg/articles/586/586626p1.html
 

bishoptl

Banstick Emeritus
*ahem*

The book CLEARLY states that both Ford and Arthur are strapped into chairs during the Vogon poetry reading, NOT against some cement blocks. This shocking lack of attention to detail gives me the confidence to declare this the WORST MOVIE EVER.
 

ManaByte

Gold Member
bishoptl said:
*ahem*

The book CLEARLY states that both Ford and Arthur are strapped into chairs during the Vogon poetry reading, NOT against some cement blocks. This shocking lack of attention to detail gives me the confidence to declare this the WORST MOVIE EVER.

Except Douglas Adams wrote the movie's screenplay.
 

Iceman

Member
bishoptl said:
*ahem*

The book CLEARLY states that both Ford and Arthur are strapped into chairs during the Vogon poetry reading, NOT against some cement blocks. This shocking lack of attention to detail gives me the confidence to declare this the WORST MOVIE EVER.

those COULD be the vogon equivalent of lazy boys.
 

Particle Physicist

between a quark and a baryon
Dan said:
Does that change the discrepancy with the book? No.


Douglas Adams also stated that none of the different media versions of HGTTG should be compared to each other.. they are each their own entity.. considering the drastic differences between the books/tv show/radio readings.. no one should really complain about the differences in this movie.
 
quadriplegicjon said:
Douglas Adams also stated that none of the different media versions of HGTTG should be compared to each other.. they are each their own entity.. considering the drastic differences between the books/tv show/radio readings.. no one should really complain about the differences in this movie.

Like that's going to stop people complaining. What the does the guy who created the whole thing know?
 

Dan

No longer boycotting the Wolfenstein franchise
quadriplegicjon said:
Douglas Adams also stated that none of the different media versions of HGTTG should be compared to each other.. they are each their own entity.. considering the drastic differences between the books/tv show/radio readings.. no one should really complain about the differences in this movie.
I couldn't care less about this but...

The creator's wishes are irrelevant. All of the different entities exist in the same universe and are thus perfectly open to comparison. Just because he originated or authorized the changes doesn't make them beyond questioning.

Again, this little tidbit isn't important, but the whole excuse that people can't question the changes in the film just because Adams wrote the screenplay is just dumb.
 

RevenantKioku

PEINS PEINS PEINS PEINS PEINS PEINS PEINS PEINS PEINS PEINS PEINS PEINS oh god i am drowning in them
Dan said:
I couldn't care less about this but...

The creator's wishes are irrelevant. All of the different entities exist in the same universe and are thus perfectly open to comparison. Just because he originated or authorized the changes doesn't make them beyond questioning.

Again, this little tidbit isn't important, but the whole excuse that people can't question the changes in the film just because Adams wrote the screenplay is just dumb.

There is a difference between questioning why changes were made and complaining because the movie is not exactly like the book.
 

Dan

No longer boycotting the Wolfenstein franchise
RevenantKioku said:
There is a difference between questioning why changes were made and complaining because the movie is not exactly like the book.
I didn't say there wasn't a difference between questioning significant changes and being anal. All I said was that Douglas Adams' role in the screenplay does not change the simple fact that it is different.

I'm just real tired of the whole concept of the "Douglas Adams wrote it so stop questioning the creative decisions" argument.
 
Dan said:
Again, this little tidbit isn't important, but the whole excuse that people can't question the changes in the film just because Adams wrote the screenplay is just dumb.

Obviously you can question the changes. However it just makes the people sweating the small stuff (like being tied to chairs vs. stones) look stupid (well more stupid than they usually look in these situations).
 

RevenantKioku

PEINS PEINS PEINS PEINS PEINS PEINS PEINS PEINS PEINS PEINS PEINS PEINS oh god i am drowning in them
Dan said:
I didn't say there wasn't a difference between questioning significant changes and being anal. All I said was that Douglas Adams' role in the screenplay does not change the simple fact that it is different.

I'm just real tired of the whole concept of the "Douglas Adams wrote it so stop questioning the creative decisions" argument.

Nor did I ever claim that was what you said. :D
Now while Bish was obviously fucking around, that kind of statement raises a point. Its a common thought that book to movie translations are poor because they often fail to capture certain points the author had or intended. But since this case the screen writer and the original author of the books are one and the same, it changes things slightly.
 

android

Theoretical Magician
I posted this first :) also heres what the babel fishes, towels and electronic thumb toys by NECA look like. I love the Vogon's.
survivalkit.jpg
 

Flynn

Member
God. You sticklers are obnoxious.

I don't want to see an exact retelling of any book or comic or video game onscreen.

Why? Because I already read the goddamn book and comic and I already played the video game.

And said game or book or whatever was perfectly suited to its original format -- perfectly reflecting the author's fantastic understanding and control of his or her chosen medium.

From that initial experience on out its all interpretation. Like cover songs. People riffing on the ideas, expanding and contracting and making it their own.

I know someday they'll invent a computer program that will perfectly replicate a book into an obnoxious, perfectly detailed 90-hour-long cut scene that leaves no titbit unwanked. Until that sad day live with the fact that you'll never see the movie that you saw in your head.
 

Crowza

Member
bishoptl said:
*ahem*

The book CLEARLY states that both Ford and Arthur are strapped into chairs during the Vogon poetry reading, NOT against some cement blocks. This shocking lack of attention to detail gives me the confidence to declare this the WORST MOVIE EVER.

Too bad that the book wasn't the original source material. :)

The book was based on the BBC Radio drama (broadcast on Public Broadcast Radio in the US). Also, if you are a big Hitchhiker's fan, you'd know that every version of the story changes slightly whether it was Radio, Book, Videogame, Graphic Novel, Television Show or the Movie.

Plus, Douglas Adams had a huge hand in the screenplay before he died and the Directors are huge fans that pay homage to the original source material (hence the BBC TV Marvin making a cameo).

I have great faith in the film.

Don't Panic.
 

jett

D-Member
Well, the Vogons don't look anywhere near how I imagined them to be...just like every other character in the film(besides Arthur). W00t... :\
 

android

Theoretical Magician
Don't Panic.
:) I really love the design of this movie. Very Red dwarf, Dark Crystal feel. The only way it could possible be better is if Terry Gilliam was the director. And he's back to making films with Brother Grimm in 2005 and Tideland in 2006, so it's all good.
 

speedpop

Has problems recognising girls
Those look awesome.

Any complainers need to get off your high horse and create your own damn Hitchhiker's movie.

The IGN article also states that the full trailer will be online next week. Woop~
 

Mifune

Mehmber
android said:
:) I really love the design of this movie. Very Red dwarf, Dark Crystal feel. The only way it could possible be better is if Terry Gilliam was the director. And he's back to making films with Brother Grimm in 2005 and Tideland in 2006, so it's all good.

According to Gilliam, Tideland will be out this year, too. Two Gilliam movies in one year? Pinch me, I'm dreaming.
 

Mifune

Mehmber
android said:
What!!!!!!??

Well, Gilliam hopes to have it out this year. And I believe it's been confirmed to be premiering at Cannes this year. So 2005 definitely sounds reasonable.
 

android

Theoretical Magician
Mifune said:
Well, Gilliam hopes to have it out this year. And I believe it's been confirmed to be premiering at Cannes this year. So 2005 definitely sounds reasonable.
That would be amazing.
 

demon

I don't mean to alarm you but you have dogs on your face
I always pictured the android as a lot smaller, like two and a half feet tall or something.
 
ok i never read the book, but these pics are awsome.

i really hope this will be a new kind of space adventure film.

i heard that its more of a comedy...is that true?
 

demon

I don't mean to alarm you but you have dogs on your face
robertsan21 said:
ok i never read the book, but these pics are awsome.

i really hope this will be a new kind of space adventure film.

i heard that its more of a comedy...is that true?
Yeah it's a weird comedy. And you should read the book...it's really short and it's a fast read.
 
demon said:
Yeah it's a weird comedy. And you should read the book...it's really short and it's a fast read.

ah shit, i was really looking forward to a deep space adventure film.....oh well i guess i have to read the book.

thanks
 

demon

I don't mean to alarm you but you have dogs on your face
robertsan21 said:
ah shit, i was really looking forward to a deep space adventure film.....oh well i guess i have to read the book.

thanks
Eh, remove the comedy and it's as much of a deep-space sci-fi adventure story as any other. But with comedy. Just like 'Mom and Dad Save the World' with Jon Lovitz!
 

android

Theoretical Magician
I always pictured the android as a lot smaller, like two and a half feet tall or something.

I AM NOT. It will be about a half foot taller than Warwick Davis. :)
golem said:
oh man i hope that towel is high quality cuz i just might have to have one.
I believe you might get all three items in a package. Heres the link. Great site for the movie. Clicking the NECA highlight there takes you to the promo at NECA.
http://www.h2g2movie.com/pages/february04.html
 

Archaix

Drunky McMurder
6.8 said:
I cannot go see that movie not sporting a towel.

I've been trying to convince myself that doing so would just about be the dorkiest thing ever.

Yeah, it's not working.

Also, I can't say I really had any picture of the Vogons in mind for some reason. Yet, at the same time, they don't look quite how I expected. Marvin, though, I always pictured as very tall. Like 7 feet tall, with noticably poor posture making him appear much shorter. And thin.

Pretty much the opposite of what he is here. But I absolutely love the design they went with in the movie.
 

Iceman

Member
I might just do the towel thing as well.

Heck, it wont be as bad as the gang of frat boys wearing Mr. Incredible costumes at the opening to that movie.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom