Rockandrollclown
lookwhatyou'vedone
Isn't the worst part of every Marvel movie the villain?
I agree with you. Bringing Ultron back would be too much character creep in a series of movies that already has to deal with a ton of characters and lore
Oh for God's sake!Art book is out in Hong Kong.
Isn't the worst part of every Marvel movie the villain?
Even Ultron didn't seem to completely know what he was doing as he went. He kidnaps Widow and then just...sorta leaves her to hang out or get rescued and help destroy him or, y'know, whatever. Even if he took her as some sort of back-up bait/motivation for the Avengers to show up at his floating-meteor-city, why not just*actually* kill her once the others were definitely there/on their way?
He blatantly admits that he only kidnapped Nat so he could have someone to talk to.
But she's still an Avenger. The group who are at the *very top* of his kill list. He was practically *born* wanting these specific people dead and he just leaves her alone and *completely* unharmed to be rescued, turn around and help to foil his big evil scheme and apparently kill him.
James Spader's voice keeps saying "I'm a serious threat" but Ultron keeps *doing,* like, every weird counter-intuitive thing he can think of like it's a nervous tic, or something.
But she's still an Avenger. The group who are at the *very top* of his kill list. He was practically *born* wanting these specific people dead and he just leaves her alone and *completely* unharmed to be rescued, turn around and help to foil his big evil scheme and apparently kill him.
James Spader's voice keeps saying "I'm a serious threat" but Ultron keeps *doing,* like, every weird counter-intuitive thing he can think of like it's a nervous tic, or something.
She's bait and he wants her to bring the team to him.
Even if he took her as some sort of back-up bait/motivation for the Avengers to show up at his floating-meteor-city, why not just *actually* kill her once the others were definitely there/on their way?
He never really fucked shit up, he never really seem unstoppable...
Ultron is meant to be flawed. He's more human than he ever wants to admit.
I agree with you. Bringing Ultron back would be too much character creep in a series of movies that already has to deal with a ton of characters and lore
I think they might have been able to do something if they had made Ant-Man come out first as a backstory and a building up or a lead in for Ultron and then Age of Ultron.
Like Hank creates him or barely is able to destroy but he comes back even more ruthless in Age of Ultron. It would line up well with with the comics as well along with giving Ultron more development.
Huh? They explain Ultron's motivation like as soon as he is online. The way he was going to carry it out was later of course.Age of Utron is kind of like The Hobbit, a movie where you wait for the entire film to finally get around to explaining some actual backstory or character motivation for the guy in the actual title.
Hey, you guys remember Revenge of the Fallen? There was a character in there that had that had that name too. Does anyone remember that guy? Does anyone even care?
So a retread of Thor to Avengers?I think they might have been able to do something if they had made Ant-Man come out first as a backstory and a building up or a lead in for Ultron and then Age of Ultron.
Like Hank creates him or barely is able to destroy but he comes back even more ruthless in Age of Ultron. It would line up well with with the comics as well along with giving Ultron more development.
Kind of the point of the article man.Isn't the worst part of every Marvel movie the villain?
Huh? They explain Ultron's motivation like as soon as he is online. The way he was going to carry it out was later of course.
So a retread of Thor to Avengers?
I think plenty of people missed this point.
Just setting us up for the Thanos Copter.
Do you expect Thanos to take a taxi or something?You've got to be joki...
What the fuck?
You've got to be joki...
![]()
What the fuck?
Do you expect Thanos to take a taxi or something?
That's true for the dumbed down sequels. All the first marvel movies had good to decent villains.Isn't the worst part of every Marvel movie the villain?
I always felt that scene was showing that Ultron will still be alive -- in Vision.
You have to remember from earlierUltron's program 'took over' JARVIS and left him scattered all over the internet without even JARVIS knowing it. JARVIS was blocking Ultron's actions from getting the nuclear codes and Tony Stark went as far as to say that JARVIS is an aspect of Ultron after that took place.
So embedded in Vision is Ultron's code. Him blasting away the 'last robot vessel' of Ultron does nothing. Ultron is still going to be alive -- he is just going to find a different way to achieve his goals now.
I imagine at some point on the big screen (either in CA: Civil War or Avengers: Infinity War 1/2), Vision will declare that he lost control of himself and Ultron robots will expel out of him.
Age of Ultron last what...a week? Less? That is some age.
Maybe Ultron ages like a dog and one week for us is seven weeks for him or something like that.Age of Ultron last what...a week? Less? That is some age.
Age of Ultron last what...a week? Less? That is some age.
Age of Ultron last what...a week? Less? That is some age.
Obadiah Stane was pretty lame.That's true for the dumbed down sequels. All the first marvel movies had good to decent villains.
It's a pattern.
The movie is about Ultron trying to usher in a new age...and welcoming you to it, so to speak.Age of Ultron last what...a week? Less? That is some age.
Nope. The Dude is never lame.Obadiah Stane was pretty lame.
Obadiah Stane was pretty lame.
To be fair he was close to dying in that form as one hit would be all it takes to knock him down so...He shouldn't have flown that jet. That looked a bit silly to me. He's a flying robot, just shoot with your robot stuff.
As a character, yes, but I felt bridges made the character entertaining enough to where I was sad he died.
Maybe I just like Jeff bridges.
Could this mean that the villain in Guardians of the Galaxy 2 will be worse than Ronan???That's true for the dumbed down sequels. All the first marvel movies had good to decent villains.
It's a pattern.
Ultron always finds a way, Hank Pym had to build an antivirus program into reality itself to stop him last time, and he still found a way.
Maybe Ultron ages like a dog and one week for us is seven weeks for him or something like that.
Ronan isn't as evil as they make him out to be otherwise why would he later join the Annihilators to save the world and fight Thanos again. Also you'd think they'd work in more lines referencing his position as a sort of high judge.Sadly they would never get Ultron right without Hank Pym's character and their relationship. Though Ronan's portrayal was far worse in GoG.
It's almost as if Ultron was played by Gene Hackman. He was definitely evil but quipped a lot. Also he tried to crush the planet with a giant piece of real estate. Instead of going to Addis Ababa for some kryptonite, he went to Wakanda for some vibranium.