Vincent Grayson
Member
That's true for the dumbed down sequels. All the first marvel movies had good to decent villains.
It's a pattern.
I guess I'm alone in feeling like Ultron was the most fun, entertaining villain in any of the MCU movies.
That's true for the dumbed down sequels. All the first marvel movies had good to decent villains.
It's a pattern.
Sadly they would never get Ultron right without Hank Pym's character and their relationship. Though Ronan's portrayal was far worse in GoG.
I guess I'm alone in feeling like Ultron was the most fun, entertaining villain in any of the MCU movies.
What in the fuck? Pym is incredible.
Most likely, why break what's already making bank.Could this mean that the villain in Guardians of the Galaxy 2 will be worse than Ronan???
I guess I'm alone in feeling like Ultron was the most fun, entertaining villain in any of the MCU movies.
Dude built an infinitely large house full of infinite sexbots on the comatose body of his ex-wife. The Ultron antivirus was pretty much a cakewalk for him
Ahaha lol, definitly was my favority in the Avengers EMH, I will hunt some Antman comics if that kind of stuff is in there too.
Marvel already spoiled the Thanos fight.MCU villains are laughably bad, and I fear for Thanos, they selling to kids with the lighter shade villain, Ultron is a toy...
Besides Loki, who?That's true for the dumbed down sequels. All the first marvel movies had good to decent villains.
It's a pattern.
It's comics bro, you can actually watch people die and they will be back.I hate the plot device of "if you didn't see them die they are totally still alive!" Just feels so cheap.
Yeah I know and I always expect it in these movies but it could be handled so much better. Ah well, I still love the films for what they are.It's comics bro, you can actually watch people die and they will be back.
Nah, it's just that complaint culture tends to drown out quiet appreciation. Consumers love to concentrate on all the ways they think creators went wrong. Negative hyperbole is pop culture's gift to itself.I guess I'm alone in feeling like Ultron was the most fun, entertaining villain in any of the MCU movies.
I can't remember the last time I watched a blockbuster that had a memorable villain. The Hobbit, Skyfall, Star Trek, Guardians of the Galaxy, The Equalizer; they started well, but then the writers lost their minds midway.Nah, it's just that complaint culture tends to drown out quiet appreciation. Consumers love to concentrate on all the ways they think creators went wrong. Negative hyperbole is pop culture's gift to itself.
There's nothing wrong with being critical. The question is, what's the value of throwing another shallow carbon copied complaint on the pile?
One unfortunate compromise you often have to make when you have something worth saying in a hyper-critical atmosphere is to package your ideas in sensational language to capture people's interest. "The WORST Thing..."
Fan-spec/possible major spoiler for Avengers 3:He ain't dead. Ultron says "I will not kill him." then says "I will destroy him." The differing verbiage has to be intentional.
And he fits into a pattern- 4 villains (Red Skull, The Elf Guy, Ronan, now Ultron) so far have been "destroyed" with the Infinity Stones, but none of their deaths have been shown "directly" on camera.) Given this, having them all pop out in Avengers 3 seems very likely.
I guess I'm alone in feeling like Ultron was the most fun, entertaining villain in any of the MCU movies.
Ultron isn't dead. You honestly think he didn't leave a copy of himself in a drone somewhere in the world? Not to mention they didn't show Vision actually kill him, they only implied.
I guess I'm alone in feeling like Ultron was the most fun, entertaining villain in any of the MCU movies.
Ultron was a pretty dissapointing villain for me, never felt threatening in the slightest. Most of the movie he actually felt like the underdog who was being bullied by the more powerful Avenger team.
This is a really good description actually. Captain America was kind of kicking his butt on his own for awhile.
He wasn't a threat that needed all of the Avengers united to stop, because he (Like Loki) was only a major threat due to all of his pawns. And even then, his pawns shredded pretty easily.
uh, there's no way that Ultron's country sized meteor could have been stopped without all the avengers plus vision, scarlet witch, and qs. In fact, without those three actively fighting against him too, Ultron would have succeeded. Not all threats require physical intimidation.
A bit too Butt Monkeyish, he needed to be more serious,
I'm aware of that, but he didn't have any safeguards to his plan really, once you hit the button that was it. He didn't have a plan B or any kind of failsafe, or anyway to prevent the avengers from just doing what they did to stop him.
He did have quite the bubble butt.
His original motivation seemed to be "stop the Avengers from causing harm to the world by destroying them". Later he moved to "destroy all of humanity and make it a new age of metal".
The scene at the end with vision and ultron talking about humans was cringe-worthy bad. I swear I've seen that same scene in a dozen sci fi movies.
The scene at the end with vision and ultron talking about humans was cringe-worthy bad. I swear I've seen that same scene in a dozen sci fi movies.
The orange and blue block shit was also fucking stupid.
Yeah. He was kind of awful. In the end, he was more James Spacer than Ultron.I guess I'm alone in feeling like Ultron was the most fun, entertaining villain in any of the MCU movies.
Yeah. He was kind of awful. In the end, he was more James Spacer than Ultron.