mitch1971
Member
Have you touched grass lately? It's just grass. Overrated I say.ya'll need to touch grass
Last edited:
Have you touched grass lately? It's just grass. Overrated I say.ya'll need to touch grass
Why is everything about sex with these people?! Can't they go a day without thinking about cock, balls and fannies?
Because they are immature and emotional people who feel good when they air out their views to the world.Why is everything about sex with these people?! Can't they go a day without thinking about cock, balls and fannies?
Anthem landed at 56 metacritic. Andromeda settled at just 70. the lowest rated bioware game at the time. why didnt EA pay off anyone then? BF 2042 is 63 on ps5. 68 on pc. again, why not pay off devs then?Its a shady industry. Making it more interesting is how direct or indirect game companies and reviewers are. Is it advertising? Is it a pay out? Is it early copies and access? Is it free stuff?
My buddy ran a game site way back and he got a box full of GTA4 swag from Rockstar. Free game and collectible knick knacks. But that was the end of it. There was no NDA or contract or anything. All he did was email them if they got any promotional stuff and he was surprised when he got a free game out of it.
Did that sway his review? I dont know. I didn't keep up with his site. But his perk was as low level as you can get. He didnt get money or early beta copies or whatever.
Only way to find other than playing it yourself is to gather what reactions you can in the wild and from reviewers you trust.lmao. at least wait to play the game yourself.
plenty of bad games have gone through stuff like this. starfield, cyberpunk both had restricted access to reviewers. this isnt new. its unethical but i think people should wait to actually play the game before trashing it.
everyone here wouldve been celebrating it if it got awful reviews like suicide squad and skull and bones. both were expensive games with corporations pouring millions into marketing. didnt amount to anything.
meanwhile anti woke games like stellar blade and black myth were supposed to get blasted by woke reviewers but they both got great reviews. maybe people just like this game?
IGN
Gamespot
Dragon Age: The Veilguard Review In Progress - Return To Form
The Veilguard feels like a return to form for BioWare but issues keep it from being great.www.gamespot.com
+Another 3
+bonus (Checkpoint games who gave it 100)
What say we GAF, is this a return to form for games journalism?
Yup, that’s the answer. Even worse, they are either using a very simple prompt (hence the model gives more or less a templated review), or they are not making any changes later on.I'd bet good money most of them are using AI to 'write' their reviews.
Seems one review didn't follow orders and had to be edited:
Too many to be a coincidence. They asked the same ai to write their text, they ripped off the same review or someone told them what to write.
Bro, concord got 62 meta, which means they collectively decided its above avg game.The gameplay looks fun from what I've seen. Go throw a tantrum like a man child about other people's opinions some more. "OMG fake reviews even though I have no proof".
Multiple sites that are not the typical major gaming sites are also giving this a positive review. If there is some consistency that the game is between a 7-9 out of 10, maybe the game might actually be...ahem...good?
Literally both of MrMattyPlays and Skillup's reviews were done using free codes provided in advance and both were v.scathing.If you received the game for free from the publisher or dev, your review ain't trustworthy. It's that simple.
How on earth did this game get a higher score than Black Myth Wukong? That's what I wanna know. BMW actually ticked all the boxes necessary to make a cool IP stand out and a memorable video game.It's pretty clear the trans and trans-adjacent give the game praise for obvious reasons while the regular gamers like Mr. Matty and ShillUp look at the broader picture and think it's dogshit.
The schism between gaslighting activists and regular games who just want to play videogames has never been more obvious and out in the open than it is with the reviews for this game. When the game actually comes out and the regular folks will take a swing it is going to be brutal. No amount of 9/10 from IGN can save this game.
It's fucked up for sure but remember to vote with your wallet.
There's no way you can trust modern liberal American reviewers. We see this with movies and TV all the time - they will praise anything that bends the knee to woke nonsense no matter how bad it is. It's less egregious in video games, but don't think for a minute that it doesn't also happen there.
How on earth did this game get a higher score than Black Myth Wukong? That's what I wanna know. BMW actually ticked all the boxes necessary to make a cool IP stand out and a memorable video game.
How on earth did this game get a higher score than Black Myth Wukong? That's what I wanna know. BMW actually ticked all the boxes necessary to make a cool IP stand out and a memorable video game.
ya'll need to touch grass
Seems one review didn't follow orders and had to be edited:
How on earth did this game get a higher score than Black Myth Wukong? That's what I wanna know. BMW actually ticked all the boxes necessary to make a cool IP stand out and a memorable video game.
Simple: DA:V ticks all boxes needed for high review score- published by EA and big western AAA game, infested by woke virus to the brink it basically blows itself up, compared to small asian dev studio who refused to work with sweet baby and implement DEI policies.How on earth did this game get a higher score than Black Myth Wukong? That's what I wanna know. BMW actually ticked all the boxes necessary to make a cool IP stand out and a memorable video game.
Giant Bomb and Nextlander refuse to cover Kingdom Come Deliverance.Ah. I miss that days when the games media was more straight. You still kind of have it with Giant Bomb and Nextlander.