Lucius86 said:I think Clegg's right. The party with the most votes should call dibs and get a first shot on the national interest - the public voted for them. It doesn't mean he WILL work with the Tories - just he thinks they should get a say first.
Jexhius said:That's not how our system actually works thought - the sitting Prime Minister has the right.
killer_clank said:But if Clegg won't give him the chance he'll HAVE to resign.
operon said:where the hell is the Boat, did it sink.
richisawesome said:Looks like we're getting a Tory/Lib Dem government. Sweet.
Jexhius said:That's not how our system actually works thought - the sitting Prime Minister has the right. Not that it means that system will actually play out in reality...
Xavien said:I don't think you'll be happy with that outcome, Tories will have to bend over backwards to make a government work.
richisawesome said:As long as Labour (and brown) is gone, I'm happy.
Xavien said:So your vote for Tories was just a protest vote at Labour?
curls said:Can't get my head around how a Con/Lib government would work. Oh well if we get PR then I'm happy.
richisawesome said:Not at all - I've explained my reasons previously in the thread. Getting rid of Labour is just a neat addition.
curls said:Can't get my head around how a Con/Lib government would work. Oh well if we get PR then I'm happy.
Jexhius said:Democratically speaking, it's slightly odd that by getting the least share of the votes (vs the big two) the Liberal Democrats have more power then Labour, who got the second largest share of the votes.
dakster said:Got to give it to Clegg, true to his word.
Xavien said:Then you'll be happy with Lib Dems dictating policy to the Tories?
richisawesome said:Not ecstatic, to be honest - but the Tories still have the majority of the seats, which counts for something. And if this is the worst case scenario, it's still better than a labour led government IMO.
Clegg better put the interest of the people before his word.brain_stew said:The current system is just completely fucked on so many levels. Needs to be gutted from top to bottom. Hopefully the Tories are willing to dance, can't see it happening myself though.
brain_stew said:Uhm.....
Wrong, 326 seats is needed to form a majority. A Labour/LD coalition majority would also require the guaranteed support of the Nationalists MPs.industrian said:251 seats now for Labour.
302 seats now for a possible Labour/LD coalition.
richisawesome said:Not ecstatic, to be honest - but the Tories still have the majority of the seats, which counts for something. And if this is the worst case scenario, it's still better than a labour led government IMO.
blazinglord said:Wrong, 326 seats is needed to form a majority. A Labour/LD coalition majority would also require the guaranteed support of the Nationalists MPs.
blazinglord said:Wrong, 326 seats is needed to form a majority. A Labour/LD coalition majority would also require the guaranteed support of the Nationalists MPs.
Jexhius said:Lib/Con is just simply more likely, and I don't even think it will result in PR but there may be compromises in other areas. Interesting to see how it will play out.
I also agree that, if it was necessary, the Liberals will pull out and go talk with Labour. It makes the most sense. The Conservatives will have to compromise on something.
Nicktendo86 said:I would love to be a fly on the wall at Labour HQ right now...
This.Chinner said:Clegg is being clever. He's putting himself into a position where if talks fail/he simply wants to work with Labour, he can blame the Tories.