Boris Johnson goes on a rant saying the next director general of the BBC should be a Tory. Because who would want an impartial news service?
He manages to blame them for:
He also lays the credit for all the past 30 years economic growth on Thatcher and says Labour halted it with over-regulation.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/...nd-biased-BBC-is-on-the-wrong-wavelength.html
Laugh along with his entertaining personality all you want, he's still a scumbag. I don't know how people can be ok with this scale of revisionism yet rage everytime an US senator claims Obama traveld back in time and caused the credit crunch and the banks did nothing wrong.
He manages to blame them for:
- not being super-postive about the Olympics
- not giving free publicity to London-based start-up companies
- difficulties in his recent mayoral election campaign
- unfairly "shafting" Murdoch-owned media outlets by daring to cover the Leveson inquiry
- not being Eurosceptic
He also lays the credit for all the past 30 years economic growth on Thatcher and says Labour halted it with over-regulation.
The statist, defeatist and biased BBC is on the wrong wavelength
No wonder and I speak as one who has just fought a campaign in which I sometimes felt that my chief opponent was the local BBC news the prevailing view of Beeb newsrooms is, with honourable exceptions, statist, corporatist, defeatist, anti-business, Europhile and, above all, overwhelmingly biased to the Left.
Eurosceptic views are still treated as if they were vaguely mad and unpleasant, even though the Eurosceptic analysis has been proved overwhelmingly right.
In all its lavish coverage of Murdoch, hacking and BSkyB, the BBC never properly explains the reasons why other media organisations including the BBC want to shaft a free-market competitor (and this basic dishonesty is spotted by the electorate; its one of the reasons real people are so apathetic about the Leveson business).
The broad history of the past 30 years in the UK is that the Thatcher government took us out of an economic death-spiral of Seventies complacency. Spending was tackled, the unions were contained, the City was unleashed, and a series of important supply-side reforms helped to deliver a long boom; and when the exhausted and fractious Tories were eventually chucked out in 1997, it was Labour that profited politically from those reforms.
The boom continued, in spite of everything Blair and Brown did to choke it. They over-regulated
I have sometimes wondered why BBC London never carries stories about dynamic start-ups or amazing London exports and then concluded gloomily that it just not in the nature of that show.
the Lib Dems should allow the Government to appoint someone to run the BBC who is free-market, pro-business and understands the depths of the problems this country faces. We need someone who knows about the work ethic, and cutting costs. We need a Tory, and no mucking around. If we cant change the Beeb, we cant change the country.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/...nd-biased-BBC-is-on-the-wrong-wavelength.html
Laugh along with his entertaining personality all you want, he's still a scumbag. I don't know how people can be ok with this scale of revisionism yet rage everytime an US senator claims Obama traveld back in time and caused the credit crunch and the banks did nothing wrong.