on the leaflets for boris it did say if you chose not to vote him first put him second cos it still counts lol.
CHEEZMO;37568271 said:May the 4th be with you?
Did I seriously hear that?
Sounds like wiff waff to me.
Please. Whiff-whaff.
alot of my friends on facebook have been saying may the 4th be with you am i missing something lol
Was amazingly close in the end. No-one really seemed to think it was going to be that tight a run. Ken must be gutted.
Was amazingly close in the end. No-one really seemed to think it was going to be that tight a run. Ken must be gutted.
I it wasn't for the likes of the Green candidate being another Labour candidate in all but name he might have won.
Was amazingly close in the end. No-one really seemed to think it was going to be that tight a run. Ken must be gutted.
alot of my friends on facebook have been saying may the 4th be with you am i missing something lol
Billboards in Chicago paid for by The Heartland Institute point out that some of the world's most notorious criminals say they "still believe in global warming" and ask viewers if they do, too The billboard series features Ted Kaczynski, the infamous Unabomber; Charles Manson, a mass murderer; and Fidel Castro, a tyrant...
...Why did Heartland choose to feature these people on its billboards? Because what these murderers and madmen have said differs very little from what spokespersons for the United Nations, journalists for the "mainstream" media, and liberal politicians say about global warming.
One person who is on the list to speak is Roger Helmer, a British politician who has attended previous conferences. Having recently left the Conservative party as an MEP, the prominent climate sceptic is now the UK Independence Party's spokesperson on industry and energy.
Earlier, I sent him an email with a link to Heartland's poster campaign press release and asked him: "Will you now be reconsidering attending in light of this new poster campaign for the conference? Do you approve of or condemn the poster campaign?"
He confirmed he was still attending, adding:
I am delighted that the Heartland campaign for the Chicago climate conference has succeeded in its purpose and attracted the attention of the Guardian. I urge Guardian readers to attend the conference if they can, but failing that, to follow it on the web.
bwahaha, surely anyone even considering taking UKIP seriously should rethink their position.
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?p=37611627
Their spokesperon for energy thinks believing in man-made global warming is only for mass-murderers.
Cute.At first glance I believe he is only glad for the increased attention in the conference?
People voting for labour again is a far greater surprise and concern.
Cute.
Pray tell, good Sir, who will you be voting for in the next General Election in May 2015?assuming the coalition lasts that long
Guy on Question Time stated that £120 BILLION in tax goes uncollected, evaded or unpaid, mainly by big corporations. How much truth is there to that?
At first glance I believe he is only glad for the increased attention in the conference?
People voting for labour again is a far greater surprise and concern.
...I didn't actually expect you to answer that. Thank you.To satisfy your curiosity probably con again if things stay as they are.
just about to start fairly soon. crazy pagentry going on.
Unelected and heriditary peers sound obscene for a democracy to have on the face of it, but how would an elected House of Lords be different from the rubber-stamping House of Commons we have now? Also it was the Lords that protected us from legislation on extending the time you can be held without charge or trial and other shit laws, whilst elected MPs were falling over each other to reduce our freedoms.
Idea for Lords reform:
- Nominated by county-level executive.
- Individually approved or rejected by voters in yes/no poll.
- Serve for 10 year terms.
- Ban party membership for Lords. (I wish)
There - no FPTP system allowing a Lord to get in on 1/3 the popular vote. Each county would put forward candidates with broad cross-party appeal in order to get majority. 10 year terms are long enough to not be worried about constant re-election, but short enough to prevent apathy.
What do you think?
CHEEZMO;37702721 said:Am I the only one who doesn't really mind the Lords?
The only good thing is they have a few people from outside politics, the commons is the house that needs real reform But i would start from scratch, get rid of the monarchy and change the voting system.
What would you do after lunch?
Hmmm, End the war on drugs and restart the HOTOL space programme. And BAN COCO POPS.
And BAN COCO POPS.
And BAN COCO POPS.
Hmmm, End the war on drugs and restart the HOTOL space programme. And BAN COCO POPS.