RustyNails
Member
Woah this thread picked up. I should have linked to the study in the article in my op: Adverse Cardiovascular, Cerebrovascular, and Peripheral Vascular Effects of Marijuana Inhalation: What Cardiologists Need to Know
I don't recall doing that.
And please explain, what about your joke required it to only call out college females for sexual promiscuity?
lol ... So I should Google more intellectually dishonest articles for information about a substance that's had almost no real research done on it?
The best thing about legalization will be us actually studying the substance so I don't have to read crap online that was made for the soul purpose of perpetuating a failed drug policy.
There's a reason you used the word, "possibly"
It's because nothing has ever been linked to THC beyond correlation.
Let me just say that I'm pro legalization, but It's silly to say that a marijuana related deaths are 0 annually. Someone with a low tolerance driving while high can be worse than being drunk, not to mention that inhaling smoke, regardless of what is burning, is putting some pretty poisoning shit into your lungs.
so be sure to vaporize and not drive if you're not capable of it
Again.. where are the numbers?
We KNOW how many cancer death there are a year. We KNOW cigarettes cause cancer.
We KNOW how many cigarette smokers die a year.
We KNOW how many alcoholic die of liver diseases a year
We KNOW how many people are killed by drunk drivers a year.
The united state is very good at three things: Record keeping, Scaring the shit out if our populous and spendingmoney on the war on drugs.
And in +60 years of the demonizing Marijuana we have 0 recorded deaths that can be directly linked to Marijuana use.
To be fair, the U.S. is good at keeping records of things it keeps records on. It's kind of hard to do an accurate sample study on the use of an illicit drug, instead of legal things like alcohol and cigarettes which many more people per capita consumed, and consumed openly.
What the fuck are they talking about? You get these sentences about general emergency room visits on the rise, but literally none of the information you want: why? What are they going to hospitals for? Are they just super high and think they're dying when they're totally fine?
"Marijuana-related health problems" is just an easy scare. Give us the meat.
Smoking and alcohol fuck with your health too.
But everybody with a brain knows that.
Honestly, it seems like a fairly balanced news report that doesn't really make any exaggerated claims. I'm perplexed by the strong reaction of some posters here. I guess marijuana is a bit of a sacred cow.
What does the article literally say to you? Because the closest thing to anything real that isn't just fuzzy language and vague negative terms is one sentence that says something about cardiac arrest but also doesn't provide any statistics or sources for it. There's another sentence about 59% more hospital visits, but no clarification on what it means, how they gather that it's tied to marijuana, or how it's happening. They form the conclusion that it's just because marijuana has more THC now, which they figured out based on just guessing at it, I assume.Honestly, it seems like a fairly balanced news report that doesn't really make any exaggerated claims. I'm perplexed by the strong reaction of some posters here. I guess marijuana is a bit of a sacred cow.
To be fair, the U.S. is good at keeping records of things it keeps records on. It's kind of hard to do an accurate sample study on the use of an illicit drug, instead of legal things like alcohol and cigarettes which many more people per capita consumed, and consumed openly.
Really, what countries have legalized is your arbitrary measurement? Don't think it's possible to have picked a worse standard. Prescription meds produced by pharmaceuticals, approved by government, prescribed by medical personnel are exponentially more harmful than cannabis in any form. Prescription Painkillers Leave 100 Dead Per Day in the United StatesMedical cannabis usage has only been approved in certain countries for severe arthritis as far as I know, so what medical benefits are you talking about?
Uh huh.I'm just here to clear up some myths.
other painkilling or modulating substances don't require you to burn and inhale it.
Yes it can alleviate pain, along with a hundreds of other painkilling or modulating substances that don't require you to burn and inhale it. It's not a treatment of choice.
This is very true, and exactly what I tried (and apparently failed) to say a couple of pages back. There's a middle road here, but the biggest pro- and anti-weed advocats just make intelligent discussion impossible. I've given up on posting here because this topic is just a bit too personal for me. It puts me in a very bad state of mind, and as we are having guests over I just can't do that right now. I suspect it would influence my posting behavior negatively as well. Really can't stand how quick people are to ridicule those who don't share their view, without actually bothering to look up some research themselves. My attempts to talk about this stuff comes from a very personal space, and I just want to make sure that people don't make the same mistakes I did. I can see my views aren't wanted here, and I wish I could keep a more level head when it comes to this stuff. I can't, so I'll stay out of this. My apologies.
To recap my opinion on the matter: I do believe that weed should be legalized and that adults should be able to choose what to do with their free time as they please. I also think that general public should be educated on the possible (mostly mental) health consequences more. This thread kinda proves it for me.
As someone that has had an ambulance round to my house in the early hours of the morning after the most insane panic attack after freaking out on weed, i can confirm this. I literally thought I was having a heart attack. My chest was in an incredible amount of pain, I couldnt breathe, I couldnt stop shaking. I had pretty much accepted death was a possibility at that point, I was well aware panic attacks could leave you feeling like you were having a heart attack, chest pains, struggling to breathe etc, but this was far beyond anything I had ever experienced in my life.A panic attack can be terrifying if you don't know what's going on. With marijuana, a panic attack can last for hours.
Anecdotal I guess, but I've visited a local Mental hospital (dont know how you call it in English) and spoken with the director\manager earlier this year who told of the psychological impacts of pot. She said that it won't impact everyone, but for a person with a tendency towards mental illness (depression, anxiety, or worse things) smoking pot will pull them much closer or over the edge. Many people don't realize that a lot of them have a tendency towards these conditions and that the dangers are very real.
Smoking pot is not as safe as some are trying to make it out to be.
You do know that any substance can trigger a mental illness for a person with a tendency?
Some are for more likely to do that than others though. Especially substances which directly affect how your brain works.
I always found this interesting/amusing: The federal medical marijuana program.
cannabis-related hospital emergency room visits
Yes, the most commonly used is alcohol
mean?
As in an example or something, I've smoked my fair share and could never see why I would have needed to go to a hospital.
Ii think weed user's who use Alcohol in their examples, should think, averagely how many times so people drink Alcohol, once every weekend
How many times would you smoke weed, from what i seen alot everyday!
(i do agree Alcohol is much worse than weed, but typically Alcohol is used much more sporadically averagely i assume)
Another thing i notice from a lot people who smoke it on a daily basis, is that they are always stuck for cash and constantly owe money, plus they dont have jobs (nothing to do with marijuana i live in an area where a 3 bedroom is considered Upper class)
That's another completely irrelevant point.
Maybe it is more commonly used but does one pint of lager have the same effect that one joint would have to the average person?
Like, for instance, a father who smokes weed in the same room as his kid? People always talk about "contact highs" and how would that even effect a child.
Apologies, I was mostly considering regular usage rather than the one off usage. But in terms of one off usage, from my (relatively small) experience in healthcare, it's more of a key to unlock psychosis and mental health problems than the cause
That's another completely irrelevant point.
Maybe it is more commonly used but does one pint of lager have the same effect that one joint would have to the average person?
Does one pint of lager have the same effect that one toke of a joint would? Does one joint have the same effect that one pint of whiskey would? Where are you choosing these arbitrary dose comparisons? Just, where you'd like?
What the fuck are they talking about? You get these sentences about general emergency room visits on the rise, but literally none of the information you want: why? What are they going to hospitals for? Are they just super high and think they're dying when they're totally fine?
"Marijuana-related health problems" is just an easy scare. Give us the meat.
You do know that any substance can trigger a mental illness for a person with a tendency?
Yes? I was just pointing out that because I've noticed a lot of people are advocating cannabis as a harmless recreational drug, which in such cases is far from harmless.
again with this strawman. stop. nobody is saying it's harmless
Who rolls a joint and has one toke?
I'm going off the standard measure that people consume both by.
again with this strawman. stop. nobody is saying it's harmless
It's also a strawman to respond that other substances also have the same effect as cannabis. Nobody has said cannabis is the only substance with negative effects.
It's also a strawman to respond that other substances also have the same effect as cannabis. Nobody has said cannabis is the only substance with negative effects.
What are you talking about???
I'm sorry if you feel so strongly about it, but I have different experiences than you. I have seen and heard people make such claims.
Strawman at me all night, I guess.
do you know what a strawman is? It's the implication that an argument is being created, which it's not, for the sole purpose of defeating said argument so you come out on top.
if anything the bringing up of other substances is a non-sequitur at worst, a deflection of blame at best, but it's rational to consider when arguing that one substance should be legalized because other legal substances are just as harmful or potentially worse.
lashing out about people saying it's harmless does not a rational argument make when not a single rational person in this thread has claimed it's harmless, anecdotal hearsay be damned