• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

United States Election: Nov 6, 2012 |OT| - Barack Obama Re-elected

Status
Not open for further replies.
ikMp09kOvhbIt.gif
 

Evlar

Banned
Spent election might watching returns with my brother. He's conservative but not a Fox News parrot, and it's evident to him that the Republican Party must reverse course on the immigration issue. We talked about that quite a bit. As the demographic map changes the chances of Generic Republican winning against Generic Democrat for the White House moves from "difficult" to "nigh impossible" considering the voters that the Republican Party has purposefully disenfranchised. If they want to win they MUST begin to walk that back, or win ever larger margins of the white vote.

Problem is, in my view, the white vote they have now is a coalition of many types ranging from social policy conservatives (abortion, gay rights opposition, etc), fiscal conservatives, nationalists, and varieties of cultural reactionaries including xenophobics and straight up racists. If they try to walk back on the immigration issue they may slowly reconnect with a portion of the Latino voters they disenfranchised in pthe past decade, but they will simultaneously alienate the reactionary racist vote they currently hang on to.

Any political group with even primitive moral standards wouldn't mind losing the racist vote. The prime movers among Republicans, however, have become little more than a vessel for inducing voters to put private interests in power, so they see collecting votes as a business objective, free of all moral dimensions. They are breathtakingly cynical about any use of political power not related to private profit. Thus they really feel trapped: courting the Latinos will drive away the racists, which doesn't further their agenda of attaining power in the short term.
 

Jeff-DSA

Member
I agree with this. I think the Republicans can survive with socially CONSERVATIVE policies -- limited abortions but not wholly illegal, immigration reform, continuing to subsidize the family unit. It's the socially REACTIONARY positions that they're getting beat on, and those should be left to the American Heritage Party.

The biggest problem with the GOP is that they bully their own candidates and force them into a mold. I know a lot of Mitt's stances were adopted simply because he absolutely had to adopt them simply because he's on the Repubican ticket. If they'd let their candidates be individuals, things would be much better. 2008 Romney would have had a much, much better chance of winning last night and very well could have.

The GOP is way too stubborn. It's the same reason Huntsman got wrecked in the primaries. He's too willing to actually work across the aisle, and not just say that he's willing to.
 
As much as I want to be a good sport, Republicans have made it really hard (make Obama a one-termer, refuse to govern, illegitimate rape, xenophobia, birtherism, unskewed nonsense, Trump, Limbaugh, voter suppression, etc etc etc). They deserve to eat shit for a while.
 

CHEEZMO™

Obsidian fan
pctx I got your avatars bro. Yes plural because I'm pro-choice haw haw

FFdpf.jpg
or
mzfJW.jpg


Bonus choice

RY72s.png


Feel free to choose as you wish.

yvvUC.gif
 
The biggest problem with the GOP is that they bully their own candidates and force them into a mold. I know a lot of Mitt's stances were adopted simply because he absolutely had to adopt them simply because he's on the Repubican ticket. If they'd let their candidates be individuals, things would be much better. 2008 Romney would have had a much, much better chance of winning last night and very well could have.

The GOP is way too stubborn. It's the same reason Huntsman got wrecked in the primaries. He's too willing to actually work across the aisle, and not just say that he's willing to.

Pretty much. I think I posted something like this in the poligaf thread. The republican primaries (at least this year) forces candidates to fit that mold you speak of. Once the primary is over though, the candidates have to appeal to a broader base to win the whole thing. It just makes the whole process awkward and it becomes easy for the dems to paint their opposition as “flip floppers” etc etc. It aslo makes it easy for moderate dems/independants/repubs to side with the left. I would honestly consider voting for a republican that fit the description Tex gave a short while ago. However, the current state of the republican party is such that the Dems could throw almost anyone in and get my vote.
 

Brinbe

Member
So happy that Gallup/Rasmussen's credibility just went in the shitter. PPP fucking nailed it and offered up brilliant snark and trolls along the way =D
 
To me, it seems to me the biggest mistake Republicans made was driving out all there moderates. Every one just seem to hard right. Maybe what the party needs is modern day Roosevelt or even Eisenhower and less Reagan. But what do I know... I'm not even American.
 
So many reputations in the trash this morning, it's great. But at the end of the day hacks like Dick Morris and Michael Barone will just keep on ticking even after this devastating demonstration of their cluelessness because at the end of the day they do not trade on accuracy, they trade on telling their base what they want to hear. Although it certainly seems as though Morris is seeing a LOT of backlash from his followers who this morning feel totally betrayed by him. I'd love to believe this is the end of that fucking man-slug. Rove too.

LA Times nailed it that the overall meta-narrative of this election is the triumph of data-driven poll nerds live Silver over partisan trolls like Morris. Interesting how it's a microcosm of the larger right-wing problem of rejecting science in favor of ideology.


This is god damned hilarious.

"LEARN TO USE THE INTERNET OR GET THE FUCK OFF IT!"
"GOOGLE IS A LEFT-WING TOOL! USE IT AGAINST THEM!"
 

Klocker

Member
Do any of the folks saying they are now moving to Canada realize that Canada is more liberal than the US? Gay marriage, Legalized marijuana, Universal healthcare is already the norm there. If its so much better to live there then what sort of statement are they making about the direction the country voted to move?

Did they even check the facts on Canada's government before yelling these things and saying they'd rather live there? Wouldn't it be like conservative hell for them?

So confused by these people this morning.

Simple

They are talking out of their ass and everything they need to know about the world is from a radio talking douche bag or Fox News propagandist.

They have no idea how things really work in the world just how they work in their little bubble to rationalize their perception of "facts".


To summarize they are mostly ignorant fools.
 

Klocker

Member
So many reputations in the trash this morning, it's great. But at the end of the day hacks like Dick Morris and Michael Barone will just keep on ticking even after this devastating demonstration of their cluelessness because at the end of the day they do not trade on accuracy, they trade on telling their base what they want to hear. Although it certainly seems as though Morris is seeing a LOT of backlash from his followers who this morning feel totally betrayed by him. I'd love to believe this is the end of that fucking man-slug. Rove too.

now if someone would call out CNN for pandering to the "too close to call" election cycle they tried to perpetuate.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom