Can someone explain to me why the hell Republicans care about 30,000 people in Syria getting killed?
$$$$$$ for their friends who make missiles, bullets
Can someone explain to me why the hell Republicans care about 30,000 people in Syria getting killed?
Mitt is completely cribbing Obama's style on this issue.
Is anyone else surprised at Romney's restraint and moderation? I figured he'd come out guns blazing
CNN's streamWhat is this on?
Step 1. We cant stop the problem by killing them
Step 2. We need to kill them
i feel so conflicted, romney spitting game that i can agree on. but i don't trust him that this is the same game he'll spit if he gets power.
No shit."The president isn't doing enough about Syria! But we shouldn't get involved militarily and we should do exactly what he says he's doing."
But they still want to kill everyone.
you have issues
And get hit with a campaign ending counter punch? lol He was always going to be cautious here, he knows next to nothing about any of this running in blindly would be suicide.
Foreign policy wise, everyone knows the presidents plan
Can someone explain to me why the hell Republicans care about 30,000 people in Syria getting killed?
Assad is crying
Romney's winning so far. Obama is actually correct, but to the layperson Romney sounds reasonable and as if he knows what he's talking about, and his contradictions are less obvious than some others he has made in the past.
Romney was also smart to back off on Libya. His Libya attacks have self-destructed every time to date, so it's smart to leave it be.
Basically, Romney is talking about foreign affairs, and Obama is talking about Romney talking about foreign affairs.
Obama I think is attacking too much. He wins whenever he talks simply about the topic.
Hmm... Leave it to Obama to turn Libya into advantage.
I love how republicans are all anti war now
you have issues
"Undecided voters" don't have a clue, and that's who these debates are for.