• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

vg247-PS4: new kits shipping now, AMD A10 used as base, final version next summer

thuway

Member
I would gladly forgo BC for superior ports and enough power for devs to produce games that looks like The Last of Us cutscenes/ Agnis Philosophy.
 
A10 based.

Well that's just shit.



We need another company to enter the console market and shake things up, Nintendo is nothing more than a toy company now, MS & Sony are too scared to release an uber powerful custom hardware console because of costs.

Apple is doing just fine thank you very much.


Step forward Samsung and do the decent thing, you now have the consumer recognition of being a quality brand, and you have the resources to launch a console that could blow away these gimped PC based turds that are coming next year.

I have some shocking news for your ego... You were playing (..) with toys all the time.
 

hodgy100

Member
http://www.gamesindustry.biz/articl...tion-how-devs-pushed-consoles-to-their-limits

Sony will be using something very similar so that developers won't lose their minds trying to optimize multiplat games for Sony's new system. I was just too tired to look up the article and explain everything. So my bad.

so you say "next gen consoles will use direct x" then when someone says "no opengl" you post al ink that confirms what he says as if it is an argument against it.

OpenGL is like direct x, its a competing graphics library and the PS4 will almost certaintly use their own version of openGL that is optimised for the ps4's hardware (even if it is standard pc parts)

the ps3's problem wasn't its graphics libraries, perhaps the documentation was a bit on the iffy side. the problem with the ps3 was coding in such a way so that it ran better on the Cell which was a very different architecture
 

Dennis

Banned
which part is lol? That you doubt a console would be able to run most games at that level, or that res is shit in the first place because hex-monitor setups running 8k are way better?

That developers are going to target 1080p with 60 fps. The vast majority of the games will target 30 fps. And I am sure we will continue to see 20 fps games on the next gen consoles as we do on this gen (see AC3)
 

thuway

Member
That developers are going to target 1080p with 60 fps. The vast majority of the games will target 30 fps. And I am sure we will continue to see 20 fps games on the next gen consoles as we do on this gen (see AC3)

If those games look like damn near CG, I'm ok with this. Our PC's will thanks us later.
 
But wouldn't even the more simple games be very much optimised for PS3 hardware meaning big problems unless the emulation is very close to PS3?

Porting simple games would probably be easy but emulated as it is should still raise a ton of problems no?
From what I've read, PSN developers don't even get a full PS3 dev kit. They get a debug PS3 for around $1200. I don't think it would be much of a problem at all to emulate those games. I doubt they use anything far outside the standard libraries.


There is no distinction. Wipeout? Journey? And now there's hundreds of full fledged, previously Blu Ray PS3 games on PSN. When people say they want PSN support, they mean the games they bought on PSN.

It might be that some games will be emulated, or even rebuilt to work on the PS4 at launch but I dunno. Not expecting miracles... PS2 disc support would be nice!

Well yeah, I notate games that release on Blu-ray as full fledged titles, if they appear on PSN also its still the same case. I think its still case-by-case though, if at all. I don't see a one-size fits all approach working well.
 

Pranay

Member
That developers are going to target 1080p with 60 fps. The vast majority of the games will target 30 fps. And I am sure we will continue to see 20 fps games on the next gen consoles as we do on this gen (see AC3)

in 6th and 7th year of the console ? Yeah
 
Seeing more and more info slowly coming out about the PS4 is seriously getting the hype going for me, I have already decided long ago that unless something huge happens on the other consoles this will be the only next gen one I get (unless there is a PS Vita 2 but I doubt that would happen sadly).

Reading about how well the OS should be integrated is a huge thing in my eyes, being restricted in that sense with the PS3 is something I wish I could change so this is great news.

Also I am hoping that with regards to BC they will have Gaikai ready for PS4 and that will work by letting you stream all your PSN owned and PS+ games to the PS4 which would make it a lot easier for them plus the thought of having the hundreds of games I have in either full retail, PSN, PS2, PS1, Mini playable and not having to store them locally would be huge!

Of course they may even go the subscription route and let PS+ members stream any game they have but that could be tricky in comparison to just letting you play already owned games but lets hope.

Cant wait now for next gen to hit and im not even bothered about price, I paid £425 for my original 60GB slim and never regretted it.

Sony, bring it on!
 

i-Lo

Member
Hey, aren't you that guy who was close to Guerrilla from the start of KZ's production, right? Is it still like that? Can you ask for some info? :D

He'll have more fun stringing an entire forum along. Don't think you'll get any more info from him beyond vague teases.
 

Sipowicz

Banned
Question

Why is a powerful, expensive console the only option for sony?

Why not a modestly powerful box that costs 400 dollars and runs future games well?
 
Hey, aren't you that guy who was close to Guerrilla from the start of KZ's production, right? Is it still like that? Can you ask for some info? :D
url]
 
Question

Why is a powerful, expensive console the only option for sony?

Why not a modestly powerful box that costs 400 dollars and runs future games well?

We really don't have any good indication as to if its the latter or the former at this point. Could be either/or.
 

iceatcs

Junior Member
Question

Why is a powerful, expensive console the only option for sony?

Why not a modestly powerful box that costs 400 dollars and runs future games well?

The rumour seem more of reasonable. It didn't seem so exotic or crazy techs as far as I can see. ie nuclear-powered CPU or rumours of 720 will have 16 cores. etc..
It is look like a simple built-your-self from AMD products. I don't think it have be so expensive.
 

Durante

Member
That developers are going to target 1080p with 60 fps. The vast majority of the games will target 30 fps. And I am sure we will continue to see 20 fps games on the next gen consoles as we do on this gen (see AC3)
With how the specs are looking I hope they're targeting 720p30. Better asset base for the PC port.
 

magash

Member
Question

Why is a powerful, expensive console the only option for sony?

Why not a modestly powerful box that costs 400 dollars and runs future games well?
This is something that I also wonder. Consoles mimicking powerful pc's is not advisable at this point in time.
 

KageMaru

Member
Question

Why is a powerful, expensive console the only option for sony?

Why not a modestly powerful box that costs 400 dollars and runs future games well?

Because all the fans in this thread want it that way.

I can only imagine the melt downs from some people here if the ps4 doesn't turn out to be the strongest of the 3 consoles next gen. It would be glorious.

This is something that I also wonder. Consoles mimicking powerful pc's is not advisable at this point in time.

Why? I see nothing wrong with it. I don't care if it's the ps4 or the 720, but I do want one of them to be a good jump from current gen.
 

gofreak

GAF's Bob Woodward
Why not a modestly powerful box that costs 400 dollars and runs future games well?


I think most sensible speculation would forecast a max $399 entry level price with whatever Sony can afford to put in at that price.

I think the run of rumours we've had is in line with that.

If the system is along the lines we've been led to believe, i think it'll be enough for the software to deliver a good leap.
 
Pixel Junk Shooter 1&2 required a lot of the PS3 for the fluid dynamics for example. There's no distinction between PS3 native games on PSN like there is on the Xbox 360.

There's distinction. PSN developers don't even get a full devkit. I have a copy of a semi-old PS3 TRC and I will comb thru it when I get off in about a hour and post some more differences.
 

jaaz

Member
Bet they will offer two models, the higher priced one with an SSD. Can't see a model with an SSD at less than $399 though. Perhaps $329 and $399.

I'm excited, these are solid specs if true.
 

magash

Member
Because all the fans in this thread want it that .
The fans in this thread are the absolute smallest group of gamers. You and I do not represent gaming today. Catering to the smallest segment or group is not advisable. It will be like car manufacturers making F1 cars for the majority of car drivers out there.
 

KageMaru

Member
The fans in this thread are the absolute smallest group of gamers. You and I do not represent gaming today. Catering to the smallest segment or group is not advisable. It will be like car manufacturers making F1 cars for the majority of car drivers out there.

Without knowing all the features, and how much of the cost the company is willing to eat, there is no telling how well these systems will cater to the mass market.

If Sony can produce a console that provides a good jump, offers great multi-media functionality, and is able to sell it for $400-$500, it could sell great if it's accompanied by great marketing.
 

Elios83

Member
Question

Why is a powerful, expensive console the only option for sony?

Why not a modestly powerful box that costs 400 dollars and runs future games well?

Infact if you're following the rumors Sony won't make a super expensive, state of the art hardware again.
They're looking for a generational leap compared to the PS3 (roughly 10 times the PS3 power) at a relatively affordable price (400$).
The good news is that so many years after the PS3/360 launches we don't need the latest GPU on the market to deliver that kind of leap.
Details about how they can achieve their goals (DDR3,4, GDDR5, embedded or not, discrete GPU or just APU, unified memory pool or splitted) are of course a matter of speculation.
 

thuway

Member
Whatever Sony can stuff into a box at $500, I want in. Early adopters will pay the price, plus PSN and First Party should take a large blunt.
 

thuway

Member
Infact if you're following the rumors Sony won't make a super expensive, state of the art hardware again.
They're looking for a generational leap compared to the PS3 (roughly 10 time the PS3 power) at a relatively affordable price (400$).
The good news is that so many years after the PS3/360 launches we don't need the latest GPU on the market to deliver that kind of leap.
Details about how they can achieve their goals (DDR3,4, GDDR5, embedded or not, discrete GPU or just APU, unified memory pool or splitted) are of course a matter of speculation.

The more awesome thing is, with architecture gains and modest pricing, they can achieve 12-15X PS3 rather easily. Technology has really take three steps forward in the last 7+ years.
 
I don't think we have to worry here. It'll be powerful. This is Sony we are talking about. Somebody's console has to run the new Unreal 4, CryEngine 4 and Luminous engines. Sony isn't about to let Microsoft's next console be the only powerful one.
E3 is going to be off the chain.
 

LiquidMetal14

hide your water-based mammals
One thing I mentioned to a friend on chat with knowledge on the situation is that these are discreet gaming machines. Not that they don't have to multitask and play things like music in game but these are dedicated machines with set HW that can be optimized to hell and back.

So even with the rumored specs (which are incomplete mind you), you really are talking not just 10x more powerful but overhead above that. I can't put a finger on it because we don't have final HW in front of us but I think the advances made in the last 3 years alone have been great.
 
I don't think we have to worry here. It'll be powerful. This is Sony we are talking about. Somebody's console has to run the new Unreal 4, CryEngine 4 and Luminous engines. Sony isn't about to let Microsoft's next console be the only powerful one.
E3 is going to be off the chain.

Almost certainly the new 360 will be the more powerful console. MS just can afford it. I expect a modest console from Sony because that is really what their business needs to get healthy. Good price, big numbers and profit from day one.
 

tapedeck

Do I win a prize for talking about my penis on the Internet???
Whatever Sony can stuff into a box at $500, I want in. Early adopters will pay the price, plus PSN and First Party should take a large blunt.
Yeah Im good with that, obviously $399 sounds way better than $499 but its hard to imagine them hitting the specs that everyone will want for 400 bucks at launch.
 
There's distinction. PSN developers don't even get a full devkit. I have a copy of a semi-old PS3 TRC and I will comb thru it when I get off in about a hour and post some more differences.
There's no distinction at the consumer end for PS3 native games though, PSN games encompass everything from full retail releases through to Joust. While I don't doubt there's a cut down version of the dev kit for XBLA ports I do doubt the likes of Linger in Shadows and Journey were made with it. Any BC in PS4 (internal or external hardware/with or without software emulation) will have to be 'all in', otherwise it'll just be a confusing mess for the consumer.
 

magash

Member
Without knowing all the features, and how much of the cost the company is willing to eat, there is no telling how well these systems will cater to the mass market.

If Sony can produce a console that provides a good jump, offers great multi-media functionality, and is able to sell it for $400-$500, it could sell great if it's accompanied by great marketing.
Sell great to who? At $400-$500 consoles are not likely to sell well. You and I (the enthusiasts) are more likely to drop $400+ on a new console, the problem is the overwhelming majority of gamers will most likely wait. You should also remember that financially speaking many people are not doing well now. So $400+ might prove to be a bit steep.
 

thuway

Member
Sell great to who? At $400-$500 consoles are not likely to sell well. You and I (the enthusiasts) are more likely to drop $400+ on a new console, the problem is the overwhelming majority of gamers will most likely wait. You should also remember that financially speaking many people are not doing well now. So $400+ might prove to be a bit steep.

Do you realize how hungry hardcore gamers are for a new console? A $449 console, will sell out irrespectively. The only way it doesn't sell out is if it didn't have any software. As long as Sony doesn't cross the $499 border again, we are A-OK.
 
450-499 launch with price dropping fairly aggressively before next holiday season is what I'd imagine it will be. No way is it under 400.
 

mrklaw

MrArseFace
That developers are going to target 1080p with 60 fps. The vast majority of the games will target 30 fps. And I am sure we will continue to see 20 fps games on the next gen consoles as we do on this gen (see AC3)


that'd be good for PC gamers though. lower framerates on console (or even 720p/30) would mean much more detailed assets, and then you PC guys can exercise your muscle to get the framerate and resolution back up.
 

magash

Member
Do you realize how hungry hardcore gamers are for a new console? A $449 console, will sell out irrespectively. The only way it doesn't sell out is if it didn't have any software. As long as Sony doesn't cross the $499 border again, we are A-OK.
I respectfully disagree. Did the Xbox360 and Ps3 sell out at $400+?
 
[
Sell great to who? At $400-$500 consoles are not likely to sell well. You and I (the enthusiasts) are more likely to drop $400+ on a new console, the problem is the overwhelming majority of gamers will most likely wait. You should also remember that financially speaking many people are not doing well now. So $400+ might prove to be a bit steep.

Yeah, that's how console cycles have always worked. The hardcore are the first to buy in at the higher price range and eventually the price drops to where it is more palatable to larger and larger audiences. And people's finances may not be doing well, but Apple still seems to be able to talk millions into spending $500+ on premium tablets with great regularity. Whatever the market is for a $400 console, it's not nearly as paltry as you surmise.
 

mrklaw

MrArseFace
I think most sensible speculation would forecast a max $399 entry level price with whatever Sony can afford to put in at that price.

I think the run of rumours we've had is in line with that.

If the system is along the lines we've been led to believe, i think it'll be enough for the software to deliver a good leap.

doesn't a WiiU deluxe pack at $350 give MS and Sony more leeway on price?

I can see a $399 base sku and a deluxe sku at $499 (with the $499 being the one we'd all want)
 

Ponn

Banned
I can't see them surviving if they launch another $500 console. Not unless they follow the MS route and roll out some in-store financing/subscription model to get the consoles to people. Not in this economy even if recovers. On top the game prices which i'm fully expecting to take another jump somehow.
 
Top Bottom