BurnOutBrighter
Banned
1080p60 sounds impossible on that hardware.
1080p60 sounds impossible on that hardware.
A10 based.
Well that's just shit.
We need another company to enter the console market and shake things up, Nintendo is nothing more than a toy company now, MS & Sony are too scared to release an uber powerful custom hardware console because of costs.
Apple is doing just fine thank you very much.
Step forward Samsung and do the decent thing, you now have the consumer recognition of being a quality brand, and you have the resources to launch a console that could blow away these gimped PC based turds that are coming next year.
http://www.gamesindustry.biz/articl...tion-how-devs-pushed-consoles-to-their-limits
Sony will be using something very similar so that developers won't lose their minds trying to optimize multiplat games for Sony's new system. I was just too tired to look up the article and explain everything. So my bad.
which part is lol? That you doubt a console would be able to run most games at that level, or that res is shit in the first place because hex-monitor setups running 8k are way better?
That developers are going to target 1080p with 60 fps. The vast majority of the games will target 30 fps. And I am sure we will continue to see 20 fps games on the next gen consoles as we do on this gen (see AC3)
From what I've read, PSN developers don't even get a full PS3 dev kit. They get a debug PS3 for around $1200. I don't think it would be much of a problem at all to emulate those games. I doubt they use anything far outside the standard libraries.But wouldn't even the more simple games be very much optimised for PS3 hardware meaning big problems unless the emulation is very close to PS3?
Porting simple games would probably be easy but emulated as it is should still raise a ton of problems no?
There is no distinction. Wipeout? Journey? And now there's hundreds of full fledged, previously Blu Ray PS3 games on PSN. When people say they want PSN support, they mean the games they bought on PSN.
It might be that some games will be emulated, or even rebuilt to work on the PS4 at launch but I dunno. Not expecting miracles... PS2 disc support would be nice!
That developers are going to target 1080p with 60 fps. The vast majority of the games will target 30 fps. And I am sure we will continue to see 20 fps games on the next gen consoles as we do on this gen (see AC3)
Hey, aren't you that guy who was close to Guerrilla from the start of KZ's production, right? Is it still like that? Can you ask for some info?Wait until you see killzone 4. just wait man...just wait.
PSN games are generally modest in requirements.
Hey, aren't you that guy who was close to Guerrilla from the start of KZ's production, right? Is it still like that? Can you ask for some info?![]()
Wipeout HD, Journey, full retail games, etc etc all have pretty high reqs. I dont get people who think PSN BC is going to be easier.
He's notHey, aren't you that guy who was close to Guerrilla from the start of KZ's production, right? Is it still like that? Can you ask for some info?![]()
Hey, aren't you that guy who was close to Guerrilla from the start of KZ's production, right? Is it still like that? Can you ask for some info?![]()
Question
Why is a powerful, expensive console the only option for sony?
Why not a modestly powerful box that costs 400 dollars and runs future games well?
Question
Why is a powerful, expensive console the only option for sony?
Why not a modestly powerful box that costs 400 dollars and runs future games well?
an awful lot of bad things were said here
I have some shocking news for your ego... You were playing (..) with toys all the time.
With how the specs are looking I hope they're targeting 720p30. Better asset base for the PC port.That developers are going to target 1080p with 60 fps. The vast majority of the games will target 30 fps. And I am sure we will continue to see 20 fps games on the next gen consoles as we do on this gen (see AC3)
Pixel Junk Shooter 1&2 required a lot of the PS3 for the fluid dynamics for example. There's no distinction between PS3 native games on PSN like there is on the Xbox 360.Man, this is like the third time that im saying not full retail games.
This is something that I also wonder. Consoles mimicking powerful pc's is not advisable at this point in time.Question
Why is a powerful, expensive console the only option for sony?
Why not a modestly powerful box that costs 400 dollars and runs future games well?
Question
Why is a powerful, expensive console the only option for sony?
Why not a modestly powerful box that costs 400 dollars and runs future games well?
This is something that I also wonder. Consoles mimicking powerful pc's is not advisable at this point in time.
Why not a modestly powerful box that costs 400 dollars and runs future games well?
Pixel Junk Shooter 1&2 required a lot of the PS3 for the fluid dynamics for example. There's no distinction between PS3 native games on PSN like there is on the Xbox 360.
He's not
I should have put "lol" in the spoiler...
That's what you're going to get. And it'll be awesome.Why not a modestly powerful box that costs 400 dollars and runs future games well?
The fans in this thread are the absolute smallest group of gamers. You and I do not represent gaming today. Catering to the smallest segment or group is not advisable. It will be like car manufacturers making F1 cars for the majority of car drivers out there.Because all the fans in this thread want it that .
Wants super powerful console
Complains when it costs $600
The fans in this thread are the absolute smallest group of gamers. You and I do not represent gaming today. Catering to the smallest segment or group is not advisable. It will be like car manufacturers making F1 cars for the majority of car drivers out there.
Question
Why is a powerful, expensive console the only option for sony?
Why not a modestly powerful box that costs 400 dollars and runs future games well?
Infact if you're following the rumors Sony won't make a super expensive, state of the art hardware again.
They're looking for a generational leap compared to the PS3 (roughly 10 time the PS3 power) at a relatively affordable price (400$).
The good news is that so many years after the PS3/360 launches we don't need the latest GPU on the market to deliver that kind of leap.
Details about how they can achieve their goals (DDR3,4, GDDR5, embedded or not, discrete GPU or just APU, unified memory pool or splitted) are of course a matter of speculation.
I don't think we have to worry here. It'll be powerful. This is Sony we are talking about. Somebody's console has to run the new Unreal 4, CryEngine 4 and Luminous engines. Sony isn't about to let Microsoft's next console be the only powerful one.
E3 is going to be off the chain.
Yeah Im good with that, obviously $399 sounds way better than $499 but its hard to imagine them hitting the specs that everyone will want for 400 bucks at launch.Whatever Sony can stuff into a box at $500, I want in. Early adopters will pay the price, plus PSN and First Party should take a large blunt.
There's no distinction at the consumer end for PS3 native games though, PSN games encompass everything from full retail releases through to Joust. While I don't doubt there's a cut down version of the dev kit for XBLA ports I do doubt the likes of Linger in Shadows and Journey were made with it. Any BC in PS4 (internal or external hardware/with or without software emulation) will have to be 'all in', otherwise it'll just be a confusing mess for the consumer.There's distinction. PSN developers don't even get a full devkit. I have a copy of a semi-old PS3 TRC and I will comb thru it when I get off in about a hour and post some more differences.
Sell great to who? At $400-$500 consoles are not likely to sell well. You and I (the enthusiasts) are more likely to drop $400+ on a new console, the problem is the overwhelming majority of gamers will most likely wait. You should also remember that financially speaking many people are not doing well now. So $400+ might prove to be a bit steep.Without knowing all the features, and how much of the cost the company is willing to eat, there is no telling how well these systems will cater to the mass market.
If Sony can produce a console that provides a good jump, offers great multi-media functionality, and is able to sell it for $400-$500, it could sell great if it's accompanied by great marketing.
Wants super powerful console
Complains when it costs $600
Sell great to who? At $400-$500 consoles are not likely to sell well. You and I (the enthusiasts) are more likely to drop $400+ on a new console, the problem is the overwhelming majority of gamers will most likely wait. You should also remember that financially speaking many people are not doing well now. So $400+ might prove to be a bit steep.
That developers are going to target 1080p with 60 fps. The vast majority of the games will target 30 fps. And I am sure we will continue to see 20 fps games on the next gen consoles as we do on this gen (see AC3)
I respectfully disagree. Did the Xbox360 and Ps3 sell out at $400+?Do you realize how hungry hardcore gamers are for a new console? A $449 console, will sell out irrespectively. The only way it doesn't sell out is if it didn't have any software. As long as Sony doesn't cross the $499 border again, we are A-OK.
Sell great to who? At $400-$500 consoles are not likely to sell well. You and I (the enthusiasts) are more likely to drop $400+ on a new console, the problem is the overwhelming majority of gamers will most likely wait. You should also remember that financially speaking many people are not doing well now. So $400+ might prove to be a bit steep.
I think most sensible speculation would forecast a max $399 entry level price with whatever Sony can afford to put in at that price.
I think the run of rumours we've had is in line with that.
If the system is along the lines we've been led to believe, i think it'll be enough for the software to deliver a good leap.