Viva Pinata review thread (IGN: 8.5; GS: 8.3; 1UP: 9.0)

Do The Mario said:
wow you don't get out much do you?


This is not a good rhetorical question because I rarely post here. 1UP's pathetic microsoft bias is getting on my nerves and I think everyone has the right to call out a site that is so transparently biased as 1UP.

hadareud said:
I'm sorry to hear you didn't enjoy the game as much as 1up during your obviously extended hands on time with it.

DenogginizerOS said:
Oohh, lookie lookie! A ****ing troll hates on an Xbox 360 game without ever playing it. How pathetic.

Ohh lookie lookie. The usual 1up defenders. I've seen you posting around the same time in every 1UP thread to defend it. Are you the same person or it just rings the alarm in the TeamXbox HQs every time someone mentions 1UP's bias?
 
Sephiroth said:
This is not a good rhetorical question because I rarely post here. 1UP's pathetic microsoft bias is getting on my nerves and I think everyone has the right to call out a site that is so transparently biased as 1UP.

Ohh lookie lookie. The usual 1up defenders. I swear I've seen you posting around the same time in every 1UP thread to defend it. Are you the same person or it just rings the alarm in the TeamXbox HQs every time someone mentions 1UP's bias?
Have you played the game? Do you think John Davison's praise of Viva Pinata is unjustified? Why? On which points do you think he's wrong?
 
Sephiroth said:
Ohh lookie lookie. The usual 1up defenders. I swear I've seen you posting around the same time in every 1UP thread to defend it. Are you the same person or it just rings the alarm in the TeamXbox HQs every time someone mentions 1UP's bias?

You know me too well

http://base.teamxbox.com/tag/hadareud/
 
Sephiroth said:
Have you?
Nope, but I'm not the one calling out the reviewer on being biased. I'll play the game before I can say I agree with it or not. It's an interesting review and based on what John (and other people) says I think this might be something for me.
Have you played the game?
 
Tieno said:
Nope, but I'm not the one calling out the reviewer on being biased. I'll play the game before I can say I agree with it or not. It's an interesting review and based on what John (and other people) says I think this might be something for me.
Have you played the game?

Are you purposely being forgetful and silly? You're talking like it's the first time 1UP does this.
 
Sephiroth said:
Are you purposely being forgetful and silly? You're talking like it's the first time 1UP does this.

I can pretty much guarantee that John spent more time playing this game before submitting his review than any of the other reviewers. Maybe because he gave it more thatn a casual glance, his review is more in line with what it should deserve.
 
Sephiroth said:
So you are purposely being forgetful and silly. I refuse to argue with a person who does that in a discussion, sorry.
You're being very vague. On what basis in the actual review are you accusing John of being biased? You haven't even played the game or have you? It's getting very good impressions from gamers. Maybe John just actually liked the game instead of being biased towards 360?
Hey, I agree and disagree with lots of reviewers on games...just because I disagree with some doesn't mean they're biased, let alone an entire website.
 
Sephiroth said:
So you are purposely being forgetful and silly. I refuse to argue with a person who does that in a discussion, sorry.

yeah and arguing with someone who just makes silly claims and refuses to back them and instead jumps into meaningless banter is so much better...
 
DenogginizerOS said:
I can pretty much guarantee that John spent more time playing this game before submitting his review than any of the other reviewers. Maybe because he gave it more thatn a casual glance, his review is more in line with what it should deserve.

Maybe if 1UP didn't overrate Xbox 360 games and underrate all the others all the time I'd believe that the score was fair and balanced but when you take into account 1UP's past Reviews and Shows it's difficult for someone to believe this. I'll give that though: Unlike the TeamXbox fanboys here who were quick to insult me and defend 1UP you actually were discussible.
 
DenogginizerOS said:
I can pretty much guarantee that John spent more time playing this game before submitting his review than any of the other reviewers.

What in the heck does that mean?
My head is exploding at this oxymoron.
 
Tieno said:
You're being very vague. On what basis in the actual review are you accusing John of being biased? You haven't even played the game or have you? It's getting very good impressions from gamers. Maybe John just actually liked the game instead of being biased towards 360?
Hey, I agree and disagree with lots of reviewers on games...just because I disagree with some doesn't mean they're biased, let alone an entire website.

Saying that 1UP is biased and overrates Xbox 360 games is not vague. Now you're acting like you didn't read my first post.
 
Sephiroth said:
Saying that 1UP is biased and overrates Xbox 360 games is not vague. Now you're acting like you didn't read my first post.

I don't like you. You somehow missed my contribution to this thread.
 
Sephiroth said:
Maybe if 1UP didn't overrate Xbox 360 games and underrate all the others all the time I'd believe that the score was fair and balanced but when you take into account 1UP's past Reviews and Shows it's difficult for someone to believe this. I'll give that though: Unlike the TeamXbox fanboys here who were quick to insult me and defend 1UP you actually were discussible.
I'm sorry but I just don't see it. If you bring up PDZ, almost every website gave it pretty high scores (which I don't agree with, I didn't like the game that much), if you go to 1up reviews you see 3 reviews of PDZ, one by Hsu himself who gave it a 6. On the show they even called Shoe out on his review.

Define 'all the others'...
 
Having played the game for many hours, I definitely agree that it's AT LEAST an 8.5 game. Simply put, it's an unique fantastic game. 1UP's review is very very spot on (and of good length too!)
 
Tieno said:
I'm sorry but I just don't see it. If you bring up PDZ, almost every website gave it pretty high scores (which I don't agree with, I didn't like the game that much), if you go to 1up reviews you see 3 reviews of PDZ, one by Hsu himself who gave it a 6. On the show they even called Shoe out on his review.

Define 'all the others'...

I've noticed that every time you defend 1UP you don't see the bias, yet the people who happen not to be Microsoft fans like you mysteriously see it. Coinsidense?
 
fortified_concept said:
So guys what's going on here? The usual 1up hilarity? Let me guess. Xbox fans are defending 1up and Sony-Nintendo ones are pissed off because of its bias?

yah we were waiting for you.
 
fortified_concept said:
So guys what's going on here? The usual 1up hilarity? Let me guess. Xbox fans are defending 1up and Sony-Nintendo ones are pissed off because of its bias?

I dont see Nintendo fans whining, at all surprisingly. All the noise it being made the usual faction.
 
Sephiroth said:
I've noticed that every time you defend 1UP you don't see the bias, yet the people who happen not to be Microsoft fans like you mysteriously see it. Coinsidense?

ACen04_07-Sephiroth.jpg
 
hadareud said:
is that the new word for moneyhat?

It's not my fault Firefox sucks. I wrote coincidense and it underlined it as a spelling mistake but when I wrote it with an s it received it as correct.
 
Sephiroth said:
It's not my fault Firefox sucks. I wrote coincidense and it underlined it as a spelling mistake but when I wrote it with an s it received it as correct.

ahh, it still comes up as a mistake. And you are aware that right-clicking on a spelling mistake gives you the option to select from a group of words?
 
Sephiroth said:
It's not my fault Firefox sucks. I wrote coincidense and it underlined it as a spelling mistake but when I wrote it with an s it received it as correct.
just kidding

it is spelled coincidence btw
 
Sephiroth said:
It's not my fault Firefox sucks. I wrote coincidense and it underlined it as a spelling mistake but when I wrote it with an s it received it as correct.
Maybe because it's spelled coincidence ?
No underlining with firefox :D
 
Prine said:
I dont see Nintendo fans whining, at all surprisingly. All the noise it being made the usual faction.

And all the defending by the usual faction too. Like Sephiroth said, coinsidense?

Btw :lol at the spelling hilarity. +1 for this thread.
 
Although I'm one of the few who thinks Rare was overrated, I was slightly intrigued when I saw the first screens of this game, when everybody else was still hating on it because it wasn't the sequel to some lame 3D platforming collectathon or vapid fighter that everybody wanted from Rare. And now, the game seems to be getting some nice reviews, and I finally have a 360... so consider this one bought. When I have a bit more time, that is... does this game require a good deal of time commitment?
 
medrew said:
What in the heck does that mean?
My head is exploding at this oxymoron.

A thousand apologies all mighty grammar lord of the internet. I shouldn't post until I have at least had 3 cups of coffee.

BTW, I am pretty sure John spent more time reviewing VP than others. Better?
 
Sephiroth said:
This is not a good rhetorical question because I rarely post here. 1UP's pathetic microsoft bias is getting on my nerves and I think everyone has the right to call out a site that is so transparently biased as 1UP.

Ohh lookie lookie. The usual 1up defenders. I've seen you posting around the same time in every 1UP thread to defend it. Are you the same person or it just rings the alarm in the TeamXbox HQs every time someone mentions 1UP's bias?

You're really off base here. Davison, in a previous 1up yours podcast, along with the other personalities, slagged on Viva Pinata, laughing it off. At X05 1up's Luke Smith and I believe Editor-in-Chief Sam Kennedy were overhead talking over a Viva Pinata video and just SLAGGING it. You sound like your taking the review scores lately, personally.
 
djtiesto said:
Although I'm one of the few who thinks Rare was overrated, I was slightly intrigued when I saw the first screens of this game, when everybody else was still hating on it because it wasn't the sequel to some lame 3D platforming collectathon or vapid fighter that everybody wanted from Rare. And now, the game seems to be getting some nice reviews, and I finally have a 360... so consider this one bought. When I have a bit more time, that is... does this game require a good deal of time commitment?
It gets fun very quickly, but it still requires a lot of time, as expected for that genre of game.
 
fortified_concept said:
And all the defending by the usual faction too. Like Sephiroth said, coinsidense?

Btw :lol at the spelling hilarity. +1 for this thread.

You do know this is a Viva pinata thread? How could that faction not be "defending"......
 
I love how a thread comes up about how well reviewed a 360 game is and some newbie asshat comes in talking about how 1up is biased. Then FC comes in and pushes the claim even further.

You guys are just wow.

Anyways....

I'm really going to try to get my hands on this on Friday. Ive been watching Blims new videos in amazement. I don't know why, but this game appeals to me more than Gears of War.
 
fortified_concept said:
And all the defending by the usual faction too. Like Sephiroth said, coinsidense?

Btw :lol at the spelling hilarity. +1 for this thread.

You attack a genuwinly good game expect people to defend it. You act as if these rules dont apply here.

Its a Rare game, no-one defends Rare games these days.

Besides, 1up were VERY vocal about how shit this game was at X06, but that was ok yeah?
 
Zaptruder said:
But there ARE offers of employment! ;)

:lol Ouch!

Btw first a spelling mistake now an oxymoron. WTF with these scandals GAF?

Dunpeal said:
You do know this is a Viva pinata thread? How could that faction not be "defending"......

Because it happens in every thread that 1up is mentioned? First 1up says something biased or "reviews" a game, then people who are already pissed off with the site are saying that is biased, and finally the the xbox squad is coming in to try to shut them up and defend the site.

Prine said:
You attack a genuwinly good game expect people to defend it. You act as if these rules dont apply here.

Its a Rare game, no-one defends Rare games these days.

Besides, 1up were VERY vocal about how shit this game was at X06, but that was ok yeah?

I attacked Viva Pinata? Oh really? Can you point to the post I did that?
 
all trolls shut up!!

game is very good and fresh. I was very amazed in disbelief to discover that.

so now I say again:

ALL TROLLS SHUT THE F#CK UP!!
 
fortified_concept said:
:lol Ouch!

Btw first a spelling mistake now an oxymoron. WTF with these scandals GAF?



Because it happens in every thread that 1up is mentioned? First 1up says something biased or "reviews" a game, then people who are already pissed off with the site are saying that is biased, and finally the the xbox squad is coming in to try to shut them up and defend the site.

OR MAYBE.... JUST MAYBE...

SONY FANBOYS (LIKE YOURSELF) ARE SO MAD THAT 1UP ISN'T SUCKING SONY'S DICK THAT THEY WILL CALL THEM BIASED AT EVERY CHANCE THEY GET WITH NO MEANS OF BACKING UP THEIR CLAIMS.

Luke's not into the PS3= OMG 1up am BIASED!
Luke says he loves Resistance=Silence

Shane says Resistance will be the new Halo=OMG! RESISTANCE IS THE GREATEST EVER!
Shane says Resiatance is an 8.0 game because of SP=Silence.

So how again is 1up biased?
 
fortified_concept said:
Because it happens in every thread that 1up is mentioned? First 1up says something biased or "reviews" a game, then people who are already pissed off with the site are saying that is biased, and finally the the xbox squad is coming in to try to shut them up and defend the site.
I shouldn't get involved, but you do realise that there is a slim chance that people were not defending 1up but the game.

Reading the impressions in the official thread gives me feeling that this game actually could be worthy of a 9. GAF impressions are usually not the most uncritical ones if you know what I mean, so I trust them more than someone who is only here to attack a website and doesn't actually give a **** about the game in question.
 
Top Bottom