Fallout-NL
Member
I just saw this, and I really can't agree, especially having replayed FO1 last year. Like most isometric games, FO1 has aged decently well, but it's still just barely acceptable by modern standards. WL2 looks pretty good most of the time. As Fantastapotamus says, the character models are fugly, but you don't zoom in on them during gameplay.
FO1 is at an obvious (17 year) technical disadvantage, but that doesn't have to mean it can't look better. Wasteland 2 feels like traversing a dinky toy representation of a post apocalyptic wasteland whereas FO1, to me, looks much more like the real thing.
Feel free to disregard this (considering my bias, hehe), but yeah, I'll stand by it.