Why Did The PS3 Fail?

Pureauthor said:
Pop quiz: Which current-gen console received a best-selling franchise from the last generation, only to have it bomb horribly in comparison to its predecessors?

If you can't answer this, don't make blind assertions, please.

The 360. Ridge Racer 6. :lol

That's a really dumb argument, you can do better!

popcorn.gif
 
Pureauthor said:
The correct answer is 'Both the PS3 and the X360', because as far as Japan is concerned, both of them are dead.

You're spot on :) no argument from me, I'm 'enjoying' the thread, and just thought I'd pipe up with something daft.

Edit: The problem is, there's no retreat from the position MS and Sony are in (in Japan). What are they going to do? Release a non-HD console in 18 months time and claim all that HD stuff was bull? They're a bit stuffed in Japan.
 
Jon_Danger said:
Look at the months before and after gears of war

it took off

Also, to Threi

The Wii isn't next gen.

The Wii's success must really be pissing you off, or is it Nintendo in general, now that they have their finger on the industry's pulse, though not satisfying your gaming needs.
 
Jon_Danger said:
I think the stupidest thing is that people actually care?

Is this a contest? Or a race?

all of the consoles have something to offer, does it matter who is ahead?

This is pointless stupid fanboyism.

Jon_Danger said:
Just because I defend sony, I am a fanboy? I mean, I really hold no preference over a console. I will go where the games are, whether it is the 360 or the PS3.

Jon_Danger said:
main_photo05.jpg


sony wins
Reading these posts one after another is pretty funny.
 
Pureauthor said:
Current game library, sure. And that the X360 has been out longer is absolutely no reason to say the fact that the current X360 library stomps the PS3 library into the mud is somehow irrelevant. If a consumer walks into a store and chooses between the two, he's not going to say to himself 'Hmm, the X360 has more games I want - but only because it's been out longer. PS3 it is!"

Well, that was something I considered when I bought my HD console. The coming library for the PS3 in the next year looks like the better one to me, so I bought that over Microsoft's lineup right now.
 
cilonen said:
You're spot on :) no argument from me, I'm 'enjoying' the thread, and just thought I'd pipe up with something daft.

Edit: The problem is, there's no retreat from the position MS and Sony are in (in Japan). What are they going to do? Release a non-HD console in 18 months time and claim all that HD stuff was bull? They're a bit stuffed in Japan.

That's why the rumor of a redesigned PS2 with waggle was intriguing. As it is, Sony and MS have both brought knives to Nintendo's gunfight.
 
Jon_Danger said:
Look at the months before and after gears of war

it took off

Also, to Threi

The Wii isn't next gen.
OK.

Imagine we have a category of "things" that include only the PS3, 360, and Wii. Some of us call that next-gen, or current-gen, but that labelling seems to cause some cognitive dissonance for the less Wii-friendly among us. Nevertheless, we still need a name for this collection of three things. I suggest we call it "home consoles released in North America between November 2005 and November 2006-gen". Agreed?
 
Tobor said:
That's why the rumor of a redesigned PS2 with waggle was intriguing. As it is, Sony and MS have both brought knives to Nintendo's gunfight.

The last thing Sony and MS needs to do is to justify Nintendo's viewpoint, especially this early in the war.
 
Pureauthor said:
That was because there weren't any X360s to sell. It was masively supply constrained all the way until March.



Do you understand what 'taking off' means? It doesn't mean the plane gets two feet off the ground before hitting the runway again, it means the plane keeps rising. The X360 did not do that.



...What?

So now Gears of War, the standard (until Bioshock) that all 360 and PS3 games for that matter had no effect on 360 sales? You are claiming that it was a synergy of the self induced supply constraints and the holidays that caused the bump in sales?

You seem to be twisting facts to support your illogical statement that the PS3 is a failure. Is it not performing to expectations? Yes. Is it failing? No.

Sony priced themselves out of the majority early adopter/transitional consumers.

Simply put the Wii has rewritten the book as far as console sales go, but neither the 360 or Ps3 are failures.
 
noleshark said:
So now Gears of War, the standard (until Bioshock) that all 360 and PS3 games for that matter had no effect on 360 sales? You are claiming that it was a synergy of the self induced supply constraints and the holidays that caused the bump in sales?

You seem to be twisting facts to support your illogical statement that the PS3 is a failure. Is it not performing to expectations? Yes. Is it failing? No.

Sony priced themselves out of the majority early adopter/transitional consumers.

Simply put the Wii has rewritten the book as far as console sales go, but neither the 360 or Ps3 are failures.

Not performing to projected expectations is a fucking failure.
 
beermonkey@tehbias said:
Yep. So how did Ridge Racer 7 fare compared to Ridge Racer V?

Maybe mistakenly, but I was being contrary - or did you just latch on to a post that looked as if it was negative to 360?

Maybe you missed the rest of what I said later on

You're spot on :) no argument from me, I'm 'enjoying' the thread, and just thought I'd pipe up with something daft.

Edit: The problem is, there's no retreat from the position MS and Sony are in (in Japan). What are they going to do? Release a non-HD console in 18 months time and claim all that HD stuff was bull? They're a bit stuffed in Japan.
 
The Sphinx said:
OK.

Imagine we have a category of "things" that include only the PS3, 360, and Wii. Some of us call that next-gen, or current-gen, but that labelling seems to cause some cognitive dissonance for the less Wii-friendly among us. Nevertheless, we still need a name for this collection of three things. I suggest we call it "home consoles released in North America between November 2005 and November 2006-gen". Agreed?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tZIvgQ9ik48
 
RiskyChris said:
Not performing to projected expectations is a fucking failure.

You beat me to it. I was about to ask "What do you call it when you tell everyone you will be number one from the get go, but insead sink to third quickly and firmly?"

It is certainly not called succeeding.
 
cilonen said:
Maybe mistakenly, but I was being contrary - or did you just latch on to a post that looked as if it was negative to 360?

Maybe you missed the rest of what I said later on

No, I was just honestly curious as to how RR7 sold compared to RRV.
 
RiskyChris said:
Not performing to projected expectations is a fucking failure.

Really? And are whose expectations are they? Will the PS3 make Sony money? Yes.

Will the 360 make MS money? Yes.

from a purely business standpoint if there is a profit, it was worth it.

It seems like the majority of posters like yourself want to be the first one to accurately predict a console failure. So you go off half cocked.

Calling anything a failure within the first year of its 10 year life cycle is ridiculous.
 
Hcoregamer00 said:
The last thing Sony and MS needs to do is to justify Nintendo's viewpoint, especially this early in the war.

You're right, nevermind the never ending multiple skews/ pricing, hardware/ software bundles, mixed messages all over the place, gotta add confusion onto the publishers, developers, as well as the marketplace.

There's a winning ticket if I've ever seen one. NOT!
 
The Sphinx said:
OK.

Imagine we have a category of "things" that include only the PS3, 360, and Wii. Some of us call that next-gen, or current-gen, but that labelling seems to cause some cognitive dissonance for the less Wii-friendly among us. Nevertheless, we still need a name for this collection of three things. I suggest we call it "home consoles released in North America between November 2005 and November 2006-gen". Agreed?
butbutbut graphics
 
Hcoregamer00 said:
The last thing Sony and MS needs to do is to justify Nintendo's viewpoint, especially this early in the war.

Nintendo's viewpoint is justified with every sales chart, every month, worldwide. It's a little late to worry about it now.
 
noleshark said:
Really? And are whose expectations are they?

They were Sony's public and oft-repeated expectations.

Remember the chestnut about Sony selling 5 million units without software? I don't think that happened yet.
 
beermonkey@tehbias said:
No, I was just honestly curious as to how RR7 sold compared to RRV.

I'm guessing it bombed too, but I think the series kinda died around RR Type 4.

Thinking about it, did Twilight Princess do all that great in Japan compared to previous installments of Zelda?
 
noleshark said:
You seem to be twisting facts to support your illogical statement that the PS3 is a failure. Is it not performing to expectations? Yes. Is it failing? No.

I know what you're trying to say. Nobody's saying that the PS3 is in danger of dying off Dreamcast-style (which sounds like what you're definition of failure in this case is). But in the context of what we're talking about, I can guarantee you Sony believes the PlayStation 3 is failing. This year the PS3 hasn't achieved any of the goals Sony wanted it to. That's the type of 'failure' we're talking about.
 
As far as I am concerned, Next-gen in general has failed (ps3/x360). Sad but true.

"How Wii Killed Next-gen" should be the title of his next book.
I find highly misguided to think that the Wii has killed next gen or hardcore gaming. Microsoft and Sony are the very only ones to blame for shooting their own foot. Multiple SKU madness which only confuses consumers, ABSURD pricepoints, penis size contest mentality when designing hardware without paying any consideration to more importan matters to consumers such as reliablity or price, loosing the focus on what a console was (hint: not a multimedia hub), killing the plug and play advantage that consoles had against the PCs, and so on. None of the things that have killed the next gen had to do with the Wii or the non games.
 
Mariah Carey said:
I know what you're trying to say. Nobody's saying that the PS3 is in danger of dying off Dreamcast-style (which sounds like what you're definition of failure in this case is). But in the context of what we're talking about, I can guarantee you Sony believes the PlayStation 3 is failing. This year the PS3 hasn't achieved any of the goals Sony wanted it to. That's the type of 'failure' we're talking about.

Right on. I don't think this guy gets that one can be a miserable, apocalyptic failure without actually being dead. See also: second albums by one-hit wonders...
 
Mariah Carey said:
I know what you're trying to say. Nobody's saying that the PS3 is in danger of dying off Dreamcast-style (which sounds like what you're definition of failure in this case is). But in the context of what we're talking about, I can guarantee you Sony believes the PlayStation 3 is failing. This year the PS3 hasn't achieved any of the goals Sony wanted it to. That's the type of 'failure' we're talking about.

You're right. I guess I am misconstruing failure as DC style versus failure to meet expectations.

Sony's recent behavior has supported your viewpoint. I think the PS3 will end up doing well, but the fucking Wii. Jesus, who saw that monster coming.
 
Ikael said:
I find highly misguided to think that the Wii has killed next gen or hardcore gaming. Microsoft and Sony are the very only ones to blame for shooting their own foot. Multiple SKU madness which only confuses consumers, ABSURD pricepoints, penis size contest mentality when designing hardware without paying any consideration to more importan matters to consumers such as reliablity or price, loosing the focus on what a console was (hint: not a multimedia hub), killing the plug and play advantage that consoles had against the PCs, and so on. None of the things that have killed the next gen had to do with the Wii or the non games.

Everything I bolded is exactly what the Wii is doing right. How can it not be about the Wii?
 
noleshark said:
Really? And are whose expectations are they? Will the PS3 make Sony money? Yes.

Will the 360 make MS money? Yes.

from a purely business standpoint if there is a profit, it was worth it.

It seems like the majority of posters like yourself want to be the first one to accurately predict a console failure. So you go off half cocked.

Calling anything a failure within the first year of its 10 year life cycle is ridiculous.
Depends on how much profit was made with how much effort. If MS made a tidy $500 over the course of 4 years, you can be assured if profit was all they were concerned about, they'd look for something else to do next time.
 
Mariah Carey said:
I know what you're trying to say. Nobody's saying that the PS3 is in danger of dying off Dreamcast-style (which sounds like what you're definition of failure in this case is). But in the context of what we're talking about, I can guarantee you Sony believes the PlayStation 3 is failing. This year the PS3 hasn't achieved any of the goals Sony wanted it to. That's the type of 'failure' we're talking about.

Yep, the problem is people call different things failure - I don't even really call the Dreamcast a failure - I had some great gaming on that machine.

Maybe there should be different rankings of failure?

the Amstrad GX4000 > Atari Jaguar > NGage > Atari Lynx > Dreamcast > PS3

The scale of console despair.
 
And then he goes with the miserable and apocalyptic bullshit.

If that were the case then most companies kill would kill it. Sony will make their money off the PS3. Just may take longer and be somewhat less than they projected.
 
Late to the thread, but I think with the recent price drop the statement "PS2 hardware is still outselling the 360" isn't true in a Sales-Age world, especially if you look at the last month in NA or the UK...the software certainly isn't doing as well if you look at the latest Chart Track (going back for weeks) and NPD (July) charts.

I don't think that argument works anymore, and unless the PS2 drops to $99 this Christmas, I don't think it will continue to hold.

I don't think that it's reasonable to call a console that may very well sell 25-30 million a 'failure' - certainly, someone would argue the point with the lineups of the GCN, Xbox, N64, and Sega Genesis. But in terms of growing the "Playstation Brand", the PS3 will certainly be seen as a failure if Sony captures less than half of the marketshare of the PS2 and loses many of the close/exclusive ties they had with 3rd parties.

What many people seem to be in denial about is the state of affairs in Japan - it has already failed there. Sony still has a shot of salvaging respectability in NA and PAL, but that territory is already lost, even with FF, GT and MGS, and I think it's time to stop arguing it.
 
I think by far the most entertaining aspect of this thread is drohne calling out others on their fanboyism, as I think even he will agree that he is terribly biased. At any rate, this book is premature worldwide, but not really in Japan. Remember, this was written by someone who predicted PS2-level domination, not some crazed Gahiggidy-a-like with a fountain pen, a dream and a fanatical glint in his eye.
 
noleshark said:
And then he goes with the miserable and apocalyptic bullshit.

If that were the case then most companies kill would kill it. Sony will make their money off the PS3. Just may take longer and be somewhat less than they projected.

Which in business, is the definition of failure, bringing us full circle.
 
Moderation Unlimited said:
As far as I am concerned, Next-gen in general has failed (ps3/x360). Sad but true.

"How Wii Killed Next-gen" should be the title of his next book.

Or "How Third Party Pub/Devs Can't Think Up Anything To Compete" would work just as nicely.
 
Funny, a lot of people looked at it as a desperate attempt by a has been company to garner console sales with a weak gimmick of a console. I seem to remember people calling it an over-clocked game cube with a motion controller.

Whoops.... they were wrong.
 
noleshark said:
If that were the case then most companies kill would kill it. Sony will make their money off the PS3. Just may take longer and be somewhat less than they projected.

You never know. Microsoft never made a dime off the Xbox. Hell, they lost BILLIONS on that machine that the 360 still has to make up for.... and so far that machine's lost them billions too.
 
Phoenix Down said:
I wonder if the Editor would think the same thing if the PS3 dropped to 399... would we still have these crazy Topics?

We'll still be having these crazy topics in ten years.
 
Phoenix Down said:
I wonder if the Editor would think the same thing if the PS3 dropped to 399... would we still have these crazy Topics?


Yes, I think the editor would be of the same opinion. $200 price drop in less than a year on a system that is costing them money and was supposed to be the undisputed champion after a month? That makes the failure even more profound.
 
Top Bottom