Fjolle
Member
Maybe its more than a refresh.
Then it would be like the best kept secret in smartphone history
Maybe its more than a refresh.
Then it would be like the best kept secret in smartphone history
I wouldn't get too excited.
MicroUSB on top confirmed. Is that an expandable storage port I spy on top? Or did they just redesign the sim port so its easier to open?
Almost looks like that Surface Phone render. I like!!! Especially the USB port on the top.
What? USB port on the top is the worst. There's literally nothing good about it.
Except for a docking situation, I can't think of a reason why this is bad. Anytime I charge with a wire, its always coming from a position where it would be easier to handle the phone if it were charging from the top.
I just don't understand the webOS/Blackberry fanesque aversion to discussing articles like the one PG2G graciously shared with us. I mean, are we supposed to ignore those scathing quotes from an investor who has run out of patience with Nokia's experiment? Are we supposed to pretend Elop isn't on the hot seat?
Except for a docking situation, I can't think of a reason why this is bad. Anytime I charge with a wire, its always coming from a position where it would be easier to handle the phone if it were charging from the top.
I'd say that part of Apple's success is the huge 3rd party accessory market. If you take a close look at the launch line-up and compare it to the WP7 launch phones, I can't say it's a coincidence that they all have the micro USB port centered at the bottom.
Most of us doesn't have usb cables coming down from the ceiling.
And look at all the accessories available for them... oh wait a sec everything went bluetooth and NFC so cables are starting to become irrelevant so positions aren't really an issue...
it was a nice idea trying to unify all the manufacturers to have it in the same position the the same depth from the rear of the device but it's not going to matter in the long run as people don't want cables.
When I'm at my desk, my cable plug into my computer below and then routes behind and over the desk.
When I'm in bed, the cable is plugged into the outlet in the wall nearby.
Both are situations where it's easier to handle the phone with a top USB port.
I'm not saying it's absolutely better, just wanted to see why it's better to have it at the bottom.
When I'm at my desk, my cable plug into my computer below and then routes behind and over the desk.
When I'm in bed, the cable is plugged into the outlet in the wall nearby.
Both are situations where it's easier to handle the phone with a top USB port.
I'm not saying it's absolutely better, just wanted to see why it's better to have it at the bottom.
And look at all the accessories available for them... oh wait a sec everything went bluetooth and NFC so cables are starting to become irrelevant so positions aren't really an issue...
it was a nice idea trying to unify all the manufacturers to have it in the same position the the same depth from the rear of the device but it's not going to matter in the long run as people don't want cables.
As long as you don't use the phone part i guess it doesn't really matter where the plug is, unless they put it on the side of the phone...
Nokia releasing a 2011 phone in a new design worldwide isn't really reason to get excited.
MyNokiaBlog seems fairly confident that it's not the 928 that is getting shown in London: http://mynokiablog.com/2013/05/07/v...ot-be-announced-in-london-on-the-14th-of-may/
I know that cables are going away in the next 100 years or so, but that's not happening for everyone right now. BT audio support in WP7 was not a pleasant experience and how well did the NFC stuff work out, when it comes to accessories?
The cable debate also made me think a bit about wireless charging in the Lumias. As much as I like the idea or wireless charging, I'm not ready to replace my $10 USB dock for my desk (for which I need a port on the bottom, btw) with a $70 wireless charging stand. Not only that, but wireless charging is not even an industry standard. You have some big names in the Wireless Power Consortium and they push their Qi standard and then you have the Power Matters Alliance (I swear, I did not come up with that name), with a different standard (obviously not compatible with Qi) and some huge names behind it . In a way it's like HD DVD vs. BD and I'm not picking a side before a winner is clear (hint: it doesn't look good for Qi).
Hated the port on the side on my Optimus 7.
MyNokiaBlog seems fairly confident that it's not the 928 that is getting shown in London: http://mynokiablog.com/2013/05/07/v...ot-be-announced-in-london-on-the-14th-of-may/
we can confirm that the Lumia 928 will NOT be presented at the London event, although we don’t know when it will actually be announced, we’re confident that it won’t be in London, nor on the 14th.
They'll probably still be disappointing. No one I know who is considering a new phone has even mentioned the One, they all want S4s. I mentioned the One to a few people but HTC has went to shit in mindshare stakes with shite cheap phones like the Desire C.
yeah, i mentioned the One to a few people who got the S4.
one said "HTC still makes phones?"
the other said "i have an EVO. i want the GS4"
http://www.3g.co.uk/PR/May2013/nokia-lumia-625.htmlNokia look set to unveil the Nokia Lumia 625 next week. The mid-range smartphone comes pre-loaded with Windows Phone 8 GDR2.
Nokia are widely expected to unveil the Nokia Catwalk at next week's press event in London. That might not be the only smartphone unveiled with Nokia also rumoured to be unveiling the Nokia Lumia 625.
The Nokia Lumia 625 is a mid-range Windows smartphone , which is the successor to the Nokia Lumia 620. Chinese sources have got their hands on the smartphone and posted pictures and details about Nokia's device.
Nokia's Lumia 625 , code-named Max, is rumoured to have a 4.7 inch touch-screen. The display will run at a resolution of 800 * 480 pixels , which reflects the affordable nature of the smartphone. While, it's thought to be powered by a Qualcomm dual-core processor.
My post was more about the 800 x 480 resolution on a 4.7" screen. I thought the Titan had a terrible screen in terms of PPI.
My post was more about the 800 x 480 resolution on a 4.7" screen. I thought the Titan had a terrible screen in terms of PPI.
DEAL ALERT: Those still looking to pick up a 920 in the us, its free on ATT with 2 year contract.
http://m.att.com/shopmobile/wireless/devices/nokia/lumia-920-matte-black.html?referrer=
My post was more about the 800 x 480 resolution on a 4.7" screen. I thought the Titan had a terrible screen in terms of PPI.
http://www.3g.co.uk/PR/May2013/nokia-lumia-625.html
I wish they'd stop with this WVGA shit. It's okay to have a 720p midrange phone.
For the love of god, I hope that is not all they are announcing.
For the love of god, I hope that is not all they are announcing.
God, no. It's definitely not all they're going to announce. That's not even what the rumor said.
It would be really funny, though.
Boosh.Phone in cup holder while driving.... That's all that needs to be said!
I know that cables are going away in the next 100 years or so, but that's not happening for everyone right now. BT audio support in WP7 was not a pleasant experience and how well did the NFC stuff work out, when it comes to accessories?
The cable debate also made me think a bit about wireless charging in the Lumias. As much as I like the idea or wireless charging, I'm not ready to replace my $10 USB dock for my desk (for which I need a port on the bottom, btw) with a $70 wireless charging stand. Not only that, but wireless charging is not even an industry standard. You have some big names in the Wireless Power Consortium and they push their Qi standard and then you have the Power Matters Alliance (I swear, I did not come up with that name), with a different standard (obviously not compatible with Qi) and some huge names behind it . In a way it's like HD DVD vs. BD and I'm not picking a side before a winner is clear (hint: it doesn't look good for Qi).
Hated the port on the side on my Optimus 7.
Stay strong, WPbros. We can outcrack Crackberry.
GAF isn't WMPoweruser.
Wpcentral is not too bad, although I can't stand Daniel, such a whiney a hole. Wmpoweruser is pathetic however, run by 12 year old fanboys.No kidding, WMPoweruser and WPCentral type of sites are Windows Phone jerk fests where you can't make any negative comments without people jumping on them. It's either love everything about Windows Phone or you're against them.