jediyoshi
Member
I think it's more shameful to charge money for something that doesn't function correctly.
What were you up to for 50 hours?
I think it's more shameful to charge money for something that doesn't function correctly.
Everyone has a right to be unhappy about the crashes whatever version they have. If people genuinely are at that stage where they have the game in that state after getting that far in, of course they have a genuine case to make for a refund.What do you think is fair if a game described as a lengthy adventure title suddenly starts crashing every twenty minutes when you are fifty hours in though? That's what this OP/thread is hinging on. I think it's fair to offer a refund in such a case, as the product is sold with the expectation of being playable for as long as you please.
'Fifty hours' seems to rub people up the wrong way. It's lengthy enough to finish lots of games, but in the case of space sims, RPGs etc, it's often barely scratching the surface. I put well over 50+ hours into Monster Hunter over the first month, and if it was suddenly rendered practically unplayable due to instability only as I reached the endgame after weeks of play, I'd definitely be asking for a refund.
This thread just makes me sad. I view video games as entertainment and a consumable product. I don't ask for a refund if I go see a movie that failed to live up to my expectations. Why should a game be any different, especially since a lot of people are just refunding because they didn't like the game and not due to technical issues.
Look, let's be real here.
There are going to be people who obviously still enjoy the game despite any and all flaws everyone else sees in it. They are going to be the vocal defenders, for whatever reason, whether it be a guilty pleasure or a genuine belief that the game is better than we all see it to be.
When a game gets a real rough reaction, those people are going to hide in the OT because it's the only place they really have left to talk positively about a game. Sometimes a few of them will wander out and run the defense strat in every thread they find because they feel it necessary, but otherwise the OT is their home to talk about the "game".
So just let them be. Don't bother going into the OT and trying to convince them otherwise because it's a futile effort. And don't bother instigating it with anyone who wanders out in the other threads. They've already made up their minds that everyone else is just being "toxic" about the game, and nothing you do or say will change it.
Getting a refund after 50 hours might seem strange to people who've been conditioned to essentially having next to no rights after purchasing a game. Gamespot conditioned people to accept "trading" a game back in for a lesser value than they originally paid, Steam conditioned people for a long time to not get a refund whatsoever. PC games specifically have long had "You opened it, you can't return it" policies thanks to CD keys and the simplicity of piracy making it quite easy to install a game, then return it.
And since they're playing a game and not seeing a "problem" with it, they can't fathom why anyone would want a refund, or why that want for a refund could possibly come after almost 50 hours of playing a game (the idea that a product can deteriorate over time to become unplayable is foreign to them).
It's going to take a long time to recondition people to the idea that they actually "can" have rights when it comes to video game purchases. And that while the developers can be your "friends", the moment you buy a game it becomes a business transaction. Friendship should have no relevancy. We pay, they deliver. If they can't deliver, we get our money back.
This thread just makes me sad. I view video games as entertainment and a consumable product. I don't ask for a refund if I go see a movie that failed to live up to my expectations. Why should a game be any different, especially since a lot of people are just refunding because they didn't like the game and not due to technical issues.
The multiplayer lies sucked but honestly Sony could've avoided all this by not trying to con people and selling it for $60 when they knew it wasn't that kind of game and should've been max $30.
Any word on refunds off gog.com?
Please tell me that's not a rape reference.
Please.
I guess physical adopters are screwed then?
The return policy of the retailer I got NMS from won't accept the game back if it isn't sealed :/
I'm wondering what was going through people's mind when paying $60 for this game.
Jesus, no. The point is victim blaming in general. No one in their right mind would compare this to rape, nor do I see how anyone not specifically looking to be combative would infer that. Thanks for running with it in the OT, though. I'll just respond here to not shit up that thread (since I feel like people enjoying the game should have a thread as well.)
Go back to the store with a seal that is holding the game in its mouth.
Go back to the store with a seal that is holding the game in its mouth.
It's what they do. I've seen them trying to shame people after inferring crazy things from their posts far too often.Your mistake was actually taking him seriously, I have no idea how in his mind he got a rape reference from that comment ...frankly its beyond me.
Wow, this has fallen a long way down on Steam's top sellers.
Is it even in the Top Sellers list anymore? I can't seem to find it there or in the "Popular New Releases" section.
I actually wanted a refund after the first day, but I bought a digital PS4 code through Amazon. I assume that is too complicated to reverse. Nice work for everyone else though.
I guess physical adopters are screwed then?
The return policy of the retailer I got NMS from won't accept the game back if it isn't sealed :/
How do i go about manually refunding a game? This thread has inspired me to refund Day Z.
I actually wanted a refund after the first day, but I bought a digital PS4 code through Amazon. I assume that is too complicated to reverse. Nice work for everyone else though.
Why should people even care that other people are able to refund their games after >50h of playing?
This so much of this. I was fairly sure I disliked the game by hour 5 but I realized my refund period was over and figured I should at least try to get some use out of it. Hell I didn't like hours 1-5 but the game and more importantly the pre-release marketing makes it seem like you need to progress for things to become interesting. I for one want to leave this dystopian future where I can be sold a bag of lies through feigned mystery and obfuscation without any recourse so I'm going to petition the fuck out of this refund process.Really I just see people who got burned, thought they had no other recourse and decided to at least keep playing so they felt like they didn't waste their money. Obviously there are people in the mix that are doing this without the best of intentions but I suspect they're in the minority.
If anything this whole debacle speaks volumes as to how bad consumers are treated when purchasing digital content.
How do i go about manually refunding a game? This thread has inspired me to refund Day Z.
edit: its in the op i see.
It is not. Reports from Reddit are that it has been removed.
It's what they do. I've seen them trying to shame people after inferring crazy things from their posts far too often.
Question now is did they hit some kind of automatic trigger based on number of refunds or bad reviews? Or did Valve say "naw" and take it down until they get a response from HG/Sony?
They don't take games down because they have bad reviews though, there are thousands of games on steam in a much worse state than NMS.
They don't take games down because they have bad reviews though, there are thousands of games on steam in a much worse state than NMS.
I actually wanted a refund after the first day, but I bought a digital PS4 code through Amazon. I assume that is too complicated to reverse. Nice work for everyone else though.
Please tell me that's not a rape reference.
Please.
To be honest i kind think its a rip off and not fair for the developers. if you played many hours in the game, you shouldn't be able to get your full money back. that's not fair.
I didn't buy the game and I didn't like it from the first day the showed us the game. and i do not think its worth 20$ value even.
but people spending hours and hours on the game, then say ( its not worth it, i didn't like it) and try to get your money back ? cmon son
I still can't understand the people saying things along the lines of "you played it for x amount of hours, its wrong to get expect a refund after playing their game that long."
What kind of bull shit mentality is this? like....are we supposed to be privileged for every hour we put into this game or something? For me, let's say I played it for 20 hours, which might be accurate. So, because I played it that long, I'm not entitled to a refund because...what? you think because I put that amount of time into it, that I got my money's worth and should be happy? bull shit. I already stated before, I put the time I did into it because I was desperately trying to find something good about the game. Something that might justify it's price, something that would lead me to believe anything the developers said prior to release.
So I played it for 20 hours...if I could get those 20 hours back, and have played a GOOD game, I gladly would let them keep the $60. However, since I can't get the time back, I want my money back. I was not sold something worth the price, and my time felt wasted. Time spent does not equal enjoyment. I don't pay the DMV, or the dentist, or the doctor's office for the time that I waste in the waiting room. If I had to pay money to waste my precious time, I wouldn't do it. Why the hell should developers of shitty games be expected to keep money for wasting my time with shit.
Sorry, kinda went on a tangent, and maybe some of what said is not compatible to the actual problem here, but I'm just trying to make my point clear. No man's sky sucked, and not just an endearing shitty game kind of way...it was not what they said it would be, and they lied every step of the way. I can understand some features that were announced near reveal not making it in the game, but up until the final months of release, they were spewing bull shit, and this game totally deserved to be taken to task for it.
To be honest i kind think its a rip off and not fair for the developers. if you played many hours in the game, you shouldn't be able to get your full money back. that's not fair.
I didn't buy the game and I didn't like it from the first day the showed us the game. and i do not think its worth 20$ value even.
but people spending hours and hours on the game, then say ( its not worth it, i didn't like it) and try to get your money back ? cmon son
I got a refund on GoG. They offer full refunds up to like 31 days of purchase or something.Well I am glad people are getting their money back. Hopefully this gains traction and sends a message to the industry at large that shady practices will not be tolerated.
Unfortunately, I won't be getting my money back as I bought it on GoG. Even if I bought it on Steam, I wouldn't get my money back as I did not pre-order the game. I knew pretty much nothing about this game, so I didn't fall for the apparent "lies". Just decided to give it a try after watching a stream for like 30 mins on launch day. If i had just watched the stream for a couple more hours, probably would have seen how shallow this game was and would have dodged a bullet.
Oh well, live and learn...
"You were asking for it, believing the developer like that."
I really don't get how the second poster is getting away with having wandered off and saying the first is making references to rape apologists in the OT thread. That's disgusting and a completely wilful misinterpretation.Please tell me that's not a rape reference.
Please.