Digital-Aftertaste
Member
Whenever nintendo has a miss it never ends up being concord levels of bad. They've always been consistent with their games for the most part.
They have their wayWhenever nintendo has a miss it never ends up being concord levels of bad. They've always been consistent with their games for the most part.
It's called having good business sense, and part of the reason Nintendo are better at it is because they have a much more clearly defined vision of what they want to achieve as a company. Sony and Microsoft tend to be more susceptible to chasing trends profits.Whenever nintendo has a miss it never ends up being concord levels of bad. They've always been consistent with their games for the most part.
Agree with you, vision to achieveIt's called having good business sense, and part of the reason Nintendo are better at it is because they have a much more clearly defined vision of what they want to achieve as a company. Sony and Microsoft tend to be more susceptible to chasing profits.
I beg to differ. Have you played 3D Zeldas before BOTW? Many of their games are known for forcing the player to repeat cut scenes and perform certain missions multiple times. They've gotten much better at this but I'm not sure "unmatched in the business" is accurate.Also their respect for the players is pretty much unmatched in this business.
* sigh * These "they should go 3rd party" brainworms...I'm torn on Nintendo. If they went out of business and just made games and I could play Mario games on the Playstation, that would be the ideal.
But I like their exclusive names JUST enough to get one of their consoles every few generations. I skipped the Wii but got a Wii U (which plays Wii games) and I don't have a Switch but may get a Switch 2.
As Devs, I feel their games are about as good in quality as a game can get. Their games very rarely have glitches or slowdown...it's ridiculous how humongous that Breath of the Wild was and yet it had so few issues. (Yes, I know, some of you will respond with some thread with a list of issues for these games but, I'm sorry, these effect a very small percentage of players). And, man, after years and years of them pumping out Mario and Zelda games, they always find a way to keep these fresh.
Overall I don't like their consoles since, with a Playstation, I really only end up getting like ten total games per Nintendo console. But those games are good enough to warrant the purchase.
I haven't liked Nintendo since the 64.
Not a Nintendo fan and have only been disappointed by their games.
They killed off 2D where so much of their best looking IP lives, disregarded the significance of their proprietary hardware and had it reverse engineered into BC NES/SNES/N64 consoles completely out of their control.
Personally I like the way they are approaching accessibility. And that they have fixed hardware and they know bits of that hardware. They are experimenting with ideas for their games
Captain Toads alt??I think because I grew up with the NES and Game Boy and now I'm slowly introducing my son to gaming with Mario. Their games have a consistent quality with something fun to offer for every age.
Whenever nintendo has a miss it never ends up being concord levels of bad. They've always been consistent with their games for the most part.
What do they say?Nes/Snes/N64/GC were peak. Nowadays I don't really care for them with their extremely shitty attitude towards fans.
Where have you been the last decade or so? Look at literally any fan project, rom hack etc. The way they treat emulation and thier insane definition of emulation in general. Making folk buy the same VC games AGAIN for the Wii U. Youtube DMCA trolling. Patent trolling. The list is endless, they make good games don't get me wrong, but they are a shitty company overall.What do they say?
This is correct. They are a very anti consumer company.I don't. I actually dislike Nintendo. I do like a lot of their games though.
By only offering subpar software/streaming emulation for their old games they've driven users to create their own modern consoles that use FPGA emulation.Wait what?
By only offering subpar software/streaming emulation for their old games they've driven users to create their own modern consoles that use FPGA emulation.
Hardware's the only way to get 100% accuracy and Nintendo not offering it via new consoles has created a perfectly legal situation where Nintendo's been cut out of their own ecosystem.
It's not hard to imagine an alternate reality where Nintendo did a better job of managing their legacy IP and offered a digital-only TV console running hardware from their old systems.
The digital-only games could easily be justified by virtue of taking advantage of new controller features, like an option to use joypad controls and triggers that were added after the systems being emulated had been retired.
Digital-only games being able to exist only on their hardware could mean an end to ROMs floating around.
Which one would you pick between your favorite PlayStation game or favorite Nintendo one?My main console is PS5 yet I always know if I crave a certain genuine-feeling sweetness and playfulness, I can reach for a Nintendo game. People hate these nebulous descriptions but whatever, there's a certain heart to a Mario or Zelda game that just gives me a sense of joy I don't find anywhere else. Even if the game might not be the greatest shit ever, that feeling of "more than a product" tends to be there for me.
Too many to be honest. Maybe Super Mario World and Returnal. But I mean shit, I can't pick a Nintendo one.Which one would you pick between your favorite PlayStation game or favorite Nintendo one?