Batman v. Superman RT Thread: like standing ovations in rain

Status
Not open for further replies.
I saw Captain America save 40 people at most between both movies if I had to ballpark estimate.

He saved more than that from the Hydra base in the first CA film. He would have saved thousands upon thousands of lives by stopping the Red Skull and Hydra.

He ended Project Insight. The hellicarriers were set to kill millions. They already had 200,000 people targeted when they were destroyed just before firing.
 
The Mandarin twist was great. The end fight was average to above average for a third act Marvel fight. I wasn't a fan of the stuff with Tony and that kid. They cram that sort of thing into a ton of comic films, and they are almost always goofy or awkward. See Joffrey in Batman Begins.

Yeah well, the kid thing felt like a throwback in a way to the era where films like Shane Black's stuff were more common I felt. Iron Man 3 felt really, really 90s to me in a bunch of ways. Even in the way it handles violence. There's some really brutal shit in it, but done in such a casual PG way. Movies used to do that more, these days, not so much. The tone was such a nostalgia bomb for me.
 
Really, you're arguing that previous written work is not a good way to judge the quality of a writer and project future works of the same writer?

When it comes to screenwriters, yes. Again, Argo was Chris Terrio's first film and it was great. Same thing with the the people who wrote Dallas Buyers Club. There are too many examples of people with no experience at writing who produce great stuff for me to think there's a strong correlation.
 
My point is he'd be saving more lives in the long run by actually facing the main threat, has nothing to do with taking an L against the bad guy. Also weren't the civilian casualties incredibly(bizarrely even) low considering all of the damage done? As per this post in the Civil War Final trailer:

I saw Captain America save 40 people at most between both movies if I had to ballpark estimate.

Those police men didn't die: https://youtu.be/66im5Mi7x3A?t=52 and again most citizens in Ultron are often treated as being in the wrong place at the right time with not much if any implied casualties if ever.

That's a deceptive cut that that ignores how much time passes between those scenes. Those cops are super dead, man, you even see Hulk throw one of them. He didn't reach in there and cuddle them.

I agree they watered down the death toll way too much in Sokovia but the Hulk fight was about as legit as they could get away with in an Avengers movie.
 
From what I've read most of the movies problems seem to come from the people at top, try to cramp as much as the movie as possible to get a cinematic universe running as soon as possible, who knows for how much longer will superheroes movies be rentable? We need this movie out!

I won't blame Snyder until I see the movie myself, not trying to lay the blame off him, but so far it doesn't seem as he's entirely to blame.

There's a Jeff Goldblum line in Jurassic Park that could more or less sum up the situation.
 
Well, since nobody's talking about Snyder's movie anymore...

First Class is top tier when it's about Xavier and Erik. It's campy and silly when it's about Teen Mutant Squad. Villains were crap. It's easily a weaker movie than X2 or DoFP.

Iron Man 3 was legit fantastic as a Shane Black movie. It's almost a better Kiss Kiss Bang Bang sequel than it is Iron Man 2/Avengers sequel. It's a classic buddy cop movie starring a man in a can. It's one of the best MCU movies.

And Age of Ultron isn't as good as the first movie, but it definitely benefits a lot from a second viewing. It's overstuffed, so watching it twice allows you to separate what's plot-important from what's not and enjoy each piece individually.

Iron Man 2 and Thor 2 were both mediocre and disappointing. At least Iron Man 2 actually had some interesting ideas that were wasted. Thor 2 is just straight up MCU filler episode.
 
IC9H8y1.png


ben the only one with an internet connection rn

lol

Hello Darkness My Old Friend
 
Shane Black made an early '90s Shane Black buddy comedy that just happened to star Tony & Rhodey.

If you at all like Shane Black I don't know how the fuck you can possibly get mad at that.

Like, if you dig

Lethal Weapon
Last Boy Scout
Long Kiss Goodnight
Kiss Kiss Bang Bang
hell, I'll throw in Last Action Hero and fuckin' Monster Squad, even.

I don't know how you come away from Iron Man Three going "man, that was terrible." It makes no sense.
 
My point is he'd be saving more lives in the long run by actually facing the main threat, has nothing to do with taking an L against the bad guy. Also weren't the civilian casualties incredibly(bizarrely even) low considering all of the damage done? As per this post in the Civil War Final trailer:

I saw Captain America save 40 people at most between both movies if I had to ballpark estimate.

Those police men didn't die: https://youtu.be/66im5Mi7x3A?t=52 and again most citizens in Ultron are often treated as being in the wrong place at the right time with not much if any implied casualties if ever.

Well again, it's just not in Cap's character to play the needs of the many vs the needs of the few game. He'll save every person he encounters no matter what, it's just who he is.

Also those numbers are supposed to be an easter egg. If you add them up, you get 274, which if you look at Avengers #274:

I kind of have a feeling that the numbers will be different in the actual theatrical release, but who knows.
 
Woah, other Iron Man 3 lovers exist? I thought I was alone. Loved Iron Man 3. Seemed too many people hated it for the Mandarin bait and switch, but I liked it. And the "too much Tony, not enough Iron Man" thing I totally disagreed with it. That's probably the biggest part about the movie I liked.
 
Browsing the thread again and was just wondering a couple of things:

What did most of you want or expect of this movie?

My buddy and I were talking tonight and we just want to see Batman and Superman beat the hell out of each other and it seems like we're getting that in spades.

Admittedly neither of us have bought or read a comic in probably 15-20 years so we may not be as invested in the characters or story lines as some people are, but we each grew up digging both characters and banging our action figures together shouting about who would win.

For a movie that's basically been marketed as a $200 million version of that, what was anyone hoping for aside from that? Not trying to troll, just genuine curiosity.​

AND for anyone who may have seen the movie; what would you suggest is the age limit when it comes to kids?
I know it's rated PG-13 and all kids are different blah blah blah... but the movie has been everywhere for a while now and our 7 year olds are dying to see it. I still won't let them watch the Dark Knight/Rises just to give you an idea of what we think is appropriate.​
 
The Mandarin twist was great. The end fight was average to above average for a third act Marvel fight. I wasn't a fan of the stuff with Tony and that kid. They cram that sort of thing into a ton of comic films, and they are almost always goofy or awkward. See Joffrey in Batman Begins.

I am not a comic reader, so I didn't have horse in that race.

I liked the Mandarin twist. I liked it a lot, though I will give most of that credit to Ben Kingsly.

Last fight was kind of meh. My favorite part was Tony popping in and out of suits. I didn't like Guy Pierce's character. It felt like Batman Forever's Ridder story, but done with sincerity. Pepper at the end was just stupid.

Overall I still enjoyed IM3, easily better than IM2, which I think is the MCU lowpoint (yes, even below Thor 2).
 
no way the ww doesn't make up for a possibly disappointing domestic number

Even with the growth of the international market in recent years, DC's strength has typically been domestic market. You can see how even in the growth in MoS and TDKR, it still is close to the domestic take while many other films have experienced much larger international takes in recent years compared to domestic alone.

Batman Begins
Domestic: $206,852,432
Foreign: $167,366,241

Superman Returns
Domestic: $200,081,192
Foreign: $191,000,000

The Dark Knight
Domestic: $534,858,444
Foreign: $469,700,000

Watchmen
Domestic: $107,509,799
Foreign: $77,749,184

Green Lantern
Domestic: $116,601,172
Foreign: $103,250,000

The Dark Knight Rises
Domestic: $448,139,099
Foreign: $636,800,000

Man of Steel
Domestic: $291,045,518
Foreign: $377,000,000

I would say BvS capping at $350-$400M D and $450-$550M F is plausible and not breaking $1B worst case scenario isn't absurd.
 
Woah, other Iron Man 3 lovers exist? I thought I was alone. Loved Iron Man 3. Seemed too many people hated it for the Mandarin bait and switch, but I liked it. And the "too much Tony, not enough Iron Man" thing I totally disagreed with it. That's probably the biggest part about the movie I liked.

79% Fresh.

I keep seeing people here surprised that other people (outside of NeoGAF) like things and it makes me laugh every time.
 
79% Fresh.

I keep seeing people here surprised that other people (outside of NeoGAF) like things and it makes me laugh every time.

I was naturally being a bit hyperbolic, since obviously there's gotta be other people out there that enjoy it and yes I know it reviewed well, but I have legitimately never interacted with another human being who enjoyed Iron Man 3 and wasn't my girlfriend.
 
On Batman:



FUCK

ZACK WHY WHAT THE FUCK

giphy.gif

Goddamn,
Daredevil can stick to his no killing rule despite everyone pushing him to the edge yet Batman can't?

I'll still see the movie and I'm still excited for the future of the DC Universe and especially Suicide Squad. But it's sad to hear this movie could have been much better than it was.
 
As a stand alone MCU film, I enjoyed IM3 a lot. The final showdown was poor, but the Mandarin twist was entirely unexpected and very funny.

IM3 suffered from being the first Phase 2 film. I'm sure I wasn't alone in thinking that Tony would be hanging out with his new buddies, and I could never shake the felling of why isn't he calling on Shield/Cap/Banner/Thor for help? It kind of felt a bit pointless and fell flat, in that it didn't progress or change the MCU one bit.

As Phase 2 progressed, more crossovers were done, and they all were beneficial to the individual films and the MCU in general. It's great this is continuing in Phase 3. A Thor/Hulk buddie movie has the chance to be epic.
 
I've heard this line of reasoning before and I don't agree with it. The comics handled Clark's development far better because even if he wasn't Superman in his prime yet, he still had the same values that were instilled on him by his surrogate parents on Earth. That's what makes Superman who he is. It's not just his extraordinary alien abilities, but the optimistic and charm and sacrifice of the human part of him.

Man of Steel's Clark is all over the place. I like the oil rig sequence and I enjoy the sequence where he flies for the first time, but the character feels muddled and bereft of the qualities of comic book Superman. What's Clark's motivation? To understand his past? There's a muddled discussion of genetics in the movie and talk about Clark being a symbol of hope, but that never feels earned. Pa Kent's characterization is horrible and Lois Lane serves no purpose to the plot once Clark gets the suit, but she's roped along anyway because Clark has to romance someone.

The difference is that the climax of the Age of Ultron is spent trying to mitigate casualties when a huge mass of land comes barreling toward Sokovia, whereas Man of Steel is about Clark disabling a "World Engine" embedded within a ton of disaster porn that felt like overcorrecting after people complained that the Donner movies and Singer's Superman Returns didn't have enough scenes of Superman fighting bad guys.

Superman killing Zod and not be overly concerned with human life in the climax is the illusion of an arc because he honestly doesn't have one. Not one that's earned, anyway.

If you want an in-depth of Man of Steel's shortcomings, I think Film Crit Hulk's essay on it is solid.

This isn't to say Age of Ultron is flawless. Only that it works better than Man of Steel.
I don't disagree with you that for the most part it is flawed in his characterization, but I had low expectations and perhaps that is why I could forgive it. I would have to rewatch both and see if my view of either differ from the first time. I can't really get into it with you if it's not fresh on my mind outside of random things I remember liking or disliking about either. Ultron just felt so hokey to me, it constantly felt as though it was trying to set up all of the potential branching sequels. Which sounds like what some reviewers are saying about BvS and its villain was just another stepping stone that they had to push through while they got to thread the needle.
I saw Cap save the entire world. We must have seen different movies.
giphy.gif

That's a deceptive cut that that ignores how much time passes between those scenes. Those cops are super dead, man, you even see Hulk throw one of them. He didn't reach in there and cuddle them.

I agree they watered down the death toll way too much in Sokovia but the Hulk fight was about as legit as they could get away with in an Avengers movie.
Fair enough.
Well again, it's just not in Cap's character to play the needs of the many vs the needs of the few game. He'll save every person he encounters no matter what, it's just who he is.

Also those numbers are supposed to be an easter egg. If you add them up, you get 274, which if you look at Avengers #274:


I kind of have a feeling that the numbers will be different in the actual theatrical release, but who knows.
Oh neat.
 
Even with the growth of the international market in recent years, DC's strength has typically been domestic market. You can see how even in the growth in MoS and TDKR, it still is close to the domestic take while many other films have experienced much larger international takes in recent years compared to domestic alone.

Batman Begins
Domestic: $206,852,432
Foreign: $167,366,241

Superman Returns
Domestic: $200,081,192
Foreign: $191,000,000

The Dark Knight
Domestic: $534,858,444
Foreign: $469,700,000

Watchmen
Domestic: $107,509,799
Foreign: $77,749,184

Green Lantern
Domestic: $116,601,172
Foreign: $103,250,000

The Dark Knight Rises
Domestic: $448,139,099
Foreign: $636,800,000

Man of Steel
Domestic: $291,045,518
Foreign: $377,000,000

I would say BvS capping at $350-$400M D and $450-$550M F is plausible and not breaking $1B worst case scenario isn't absurd.

Comic films prior to Avengers are no longer relevant, and BvS is a sequel. I think the split will be TDKR-like on the low end of things.
 
Man I thought I was the only one that thought Iron Man 3 was good after watching it a second time lol. Mandarin Twist soured me at first but that didn't change the fact that the movie was a hell of a fun ride until then. Kinda reminds me of the first Cap movie in that reguard. Really solid first act that falls apart sorta half way and finishes on a mediocre note.


OT: Pretty surprised the movie is reviewing as bad as it is. Maybe my prediction of a a good opening weekend and a huge drop off next week might hold water.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom