The R rating is for the BvS Director's Cut, SS is PG-13.- Competent director
- 3 top notch actors
- R-rating
- Joker
That's pretty hard to fuck up. Jared Leto for sure is not doing shit movies.
The R rating is for the BvS Director's Cut, SS is PG-13.- Competent director
- 3 top notch actors
- R-rating
- Joker
That's pretty hard to fuck up. Jared Leto for sure is not doing shit movies.
- Competent director
- 3 top notch actors
- R-rating
- Joker
That's pretty hard to fuck up. Jared Leto for sure is not doing shit movies.
I saw Captain America save 40 people at most between both movies if I had to ballpark estimate.
I saw Captain America save 40 people at most between both movies if I had to ballpark estimate.
God I hope not. I'm actually hyped for that.Let's just throw this question out there....
What if Suicide Squad also sucks?
PG-13.- Competent director
- 3 top notch actors
- R-rating
- Joker
That's pretty hard to fuck up. Jared Leto for sure is not doing shit movies.
Yeahp!Iron Man 3 is a top 5 all time MCU film. Only Guardians, IM1 and Winter Soldier are better.
We MCU thread now huh?
The Mandarin twist was great. The end fight was average to above average for a third act Marvel fight. I wasn't a fan of the stuff with Tony and that kid. They cram that sort of thing into a ton of comic films, and they are almost always goofy or awkward. See Joffrey in Batman Begins.
You wanna go back to that madness where people were legitimately trying to argue that Superman: The Movie was a piece of shit?
The Mandarin twist was great..
Really, you're arguing that previous written work is not a good way to judge the quality of a writer and project future works of the same writer?
My point is he'd be saving more lives in the long run by actually facing the main threat, has nothing to do with taking an L against the bad guy. Also weren't the civilian casualties incredibly(bizarrely even) low considering all of the damage done? As per this post in the Civil War Final trailer:
I saw Captain America save 40 people at most between both movies if I had to ballpark estimate.
Those police men didn't die: https://youtu.be/66im5Mi7x3A?t=52 and again most citizens in Ultron are often treated as being in the wrong place at the right time with not much if any implied casualties if ever.
PG-13.
I'm also naturally skeptical of any movie that thinks casting Jai Courtney is a good idea.
- Competent director
- 3 top notch actors
- R-rating
- Joker
That's pretty hard to fuck up. Jared Leto for sure is not doing shit movies.
![]()
ben the only one with an internet connection rn
My point is he'd be saving more lives in the long run by actually facing the main threat, has nothing to do with taking an L against the bad guy. Also weren't the civilian casualties incredibly(bizarrely even) low considering all of the damage done? As per this post in the Civil War Final trailer:
I saw Captain America save 40 people at most between both movies if I had to ballpark estimate.
Those police men didn't die: https://youtu.be/66im5Mi7x3A?t=52 and again most citizens in Ultron are often treated as being in the wrong place at the right time with not much if any implied casualties if ever.
No, they just wrote/are writing a treatment. Seth Grahame-Smith, of Dark Shadows and Abraham Lincoln: Vampire Hunter fame, is writing and directing the Flash.
The Mandarin twist was great. The end fight was average to above average for a third act Marvel fight. I wasn't a fan of the stuff with Tony and that kid. They cram that sort of thing into a ton of comic films, and they are almost always goofy or awkward. See Joffrey in Batman Begins.
no way the ww doesn't make up for a possibly disappointing domestic number
![]()
ben the only one with an internet connection rn
Legit curious who the 3 top notch actors are?- Competent director
- 3 top notch actors
- R-rating
- Joker
That's pretty hard to fuck up. Jared Leto for sure is not doing shit movies.
Woah, other Iron Man 3 lovers exist? I thought I was alone. Loved Iron Man 3. Seemed too many people hated it for the Mandarin bait and switch, but I liked it. And the "too much Tony, not enough Iron Man" thing I totally disagreed with it. That's probably the biggest part about the movie I liked.
PG-13
Legit curious who the 3 top notch actors are?
79% Fresh.
I keep seeing people here surprised that other people (outside of NeoGAF) like things and it makes me laugh every time.
Internet echo chambers.
Iron Man 3 was well made, well received, and a huge box office hit. Plenty of people love it.
79% Fresh.
I keep seeing people here surprised that other people (outside of NeoGAF) like things and it makes me laugh every time.
On Batman:
FUCK
ZACK WHY WHAT THE FUCK
![]()
I hated that movie with a passion and I even liked the first Captain America movie.
I'd be shocked if they let my girl Viola do anything fun or interesting.Guessing Leto, Smith, and Davis. Pretty solid.
From seeing it you mean? Tell all.I just got home.
Oh dear.
I don't disagree with you that for the most part it is flawed in his characterization, but I had low expectations and perhaps that is why I could forgive it. I would have to rewatch both and see if my view of either differ from the first time. I can't really get into it with you if it's not fresh on my mind outside of random things I remember liking or disliking about either. Ultron just felt so hokey to me, it constantly felt as though it was trying to set up all of the potential branching sequels. Which sounds like what some reviewers are saying about BvS and its villain was just another stepping stone that they had to push through while they got to thread the needle.I've heard this line of reasoning before and I don't agree with it. The comics handled Clark's development far better because even if he wasn't Superman in his prime yet, he still had the same values that were instilled on him by his surrogate parents on Earth. That's what makes Superman who he is. It's not just his extraordinary alien abilities, but the optimistic and charm and sacrifice of the human part of him.
Man of Steel's Clark is all over the place. I like the oil rig sequence and I enjoy the sequence where he flies for the first time, but the character feels muddled and bereft of the qualities of comic book Superman. What's Clark's motivation? To understand his past? There's a muddled discussion of genetics in the movie and talk about Clark being a symbol of hope, but that never feels earned. Pa Kent's characterization is horrible and Lois Lane serves no purpose to the plot once Clark gets the suit, but she's roped along anyway because Clark has to romance someone.
The difference is that the climax of the Age of Ultron is spent trying to mitigate casualties when a huge mass of land comes barreling toward Sokovia, whereas Man of Steel is about Clark disabling a "World Engine" embedded within a ton of disaster porn that felt like overcorrecting after people complained that the Donner movies and Singer's Superman Returns didn't have enough scenes of Superman fighting bad guys.
Superman killing Zod and not be overly concerned with human life in the climax is the illusion of an arc because he honestly doesn't have one. Not one that's earned, anyway.
If you want an in-depth of Man of Steel's shortcomings, I think Film Crit Hulk's essay on it is solid.
This isn't to say Age of Ultron is flawless. Only that it works better than Man of Steel.
I saw Cap save the entire world. We must have seen different movies.
Fair enough.That's a deceptive cut that that ignores how much time passes between those scenes. Those cops are super dead, man, you even see Hulk throw one of them. He didn't reach in there and cuddle them.
I agree they watered down the death toll way too much in Sokovia but the Hulk fight was about as legit as they could get away with in an Avengers movie.
Oh neat.Well again, it's just not in Cap's character to play the needs of the many vs the needs of the few game. He'll save every person he encounters no matter what, it's just who he is.
Also those numbers are supposed to be an easter egg. If you add them up, you get 274, which if you look at Avengers #274:
I kind of have a feeling that the numbers will be different in the actual theatrical release, but who knows.
Even with the growth of the international market in recent years, DC's strength has typically been domestic market. You can see how even in the growth in MoS and TDKR, it still is close to the domestic take while many other films have experienced much larger international takes in recent years compared to domestic alone.
Batman Begins
Domestic: $206,852,432
Foreign: $167,366,241
Superman Returns
Domestic: $200,081,192
Foreign: $191,000,000
The Dark Knight
Domestic: $534,858,444
Foreign: $469,700,000
Watchmen
Domestic: $107,509,799
Foreign: $77,749,184
Green Lantern
Domestic: $116,601,172
Foreign: $103,250,000
The Dark Knight Rises
Domestic: $448,139,099
Foreign: $636,800,000
Man of Steel
Domestic: $291,045,518
Foreign: $377,000,000
I would say BvS capping at $350-$400M D and $450-$550M F is plausible and not breaking $1B worst case scenario isn't absurd.
Legit curious who the 3 top notch actors are?