Hi. What about us Image fanboys who liked it?
I mean sure, it'd ruin your narrative if it was just DC fans pretending that they think it's good. But it's not. So cut the condescension out please.
lol, barely noticed it?! The movie stops everything, twice, to do nothing but show you Justice League stuff.
It's not baseless. Maybe you have no problem with it, but it's not an issue that people invented out of thin air. It's something that exists in the movie and, for many, was poorly executed.
Coming close to spoiler territory.
Some people are fundamentally against the take on these characters and are using it to justify their judgment that the movie was bad when in fact plenty of higher rated movies are just as flawed in terms of technical filmmaking. The only real difference is the artistic approach and that's really a matter of taste, which many are unwilling to admit. Some of them want pure escapism that depicts a romanticized reality. But the truth is, Snyder's approach of humanizing the characters in a world as flawed as ours is just as valid and does interest people.
DC's characters are more established in pop culture and therefore have more ingrained opinions about their approach. Then you have the genre trend being dominated by escapist takes. Even Nolan's trilogy had a great sense of idealism with statements like anyone can be Batman and make a difference. Many are rejecting Snyder's assertion that the real/flawed world would be no better with superheroes, and furthermore they would unavoidably be a product of the real/flawed world. Therefore, any idealism will be met with controversy and conflict. That is how the way the world is, but some people what pure escapism whereas others appreciate acknowledging how things really are. I want to see Snyder direct X-Men. Snyder does have flaws as a director but so do most superhero directors, which is why TDK is still lauded at the top of the genre. Yet, people are using any opportunity to push their aesthetic bias by conflating anything negative and use any opportunity to assert it's the approach that's the issue.
it's quite a fascinating anti-franchise blockbuster film for the first 90-120 mins. in the vein of only god forgives or quantum of solace. seeking to present a vision of the superhero blockbuster that's diametrically opposed to the dominant marvel aesethic. it's really punishing to watch, so noisy, brutal, ugly, horrible, you feel its weight. the director seems to hate both the characters and make the audience want to hate them too and be driven mad by how far removed they are from their popular identity. it subverts any clear narrative structure, nothing rises and falls, it's very hard to grasp clear story elements, grapple onto chains of events. it steadfastly refuses to take you inside the characters heads, giving it an elusive quality. the characters and story seem to exist as the world would really see them, chaotic, ugly and dangerous. it even revels in how contrived the the central conflict is, trying to mock the viewer for caring. i liked it.
Intresting thoughts from another forum.
Intresting thoughts from another forum.
so seriously gaf...how is it? not believeing the critics which i dont ever...is it fun?
Regarding cameos
Flash,Aquaman,looked silly. But not enough of him to have an opinion. i honestly have no idea what he was wearing, and the gas station scene was whateverCyborg,looked bad ass, but his scene was pretty disappointing.Wonder Woman,most interesting cameo out of all of them imo. I'm actually excited for a cyborg movie more than I thought I would be.Green Lantern,stole the show. Gal Gatdamn. That fight intro music. Same with cyborg, looking forward to her movie.where were you? I only saw reference to his love interest.
[/SPOILER]Green Lantern,where were you? I only saw reference to his love interest.
This is actually a perfect early 90s Image comic brought to life; all style, no substance. Pretty visuals married to atrocious story telling and characterization. Sloppy editing. Uneven pacing.
Zack Snyder should really direct a Spawn or Youngblood movie. It would be right up his alley.
Same. Lazarus, Walking Dead, Spread, Wytches, etc.Eh. I'm a modern Image fan. Saga, Low, Descender, Rat Queens and so on. Never actually read Spawn.
Still loved this movie.
I can't express how much I think the critics were wrong on this movie I loved it.
It was like a live-action DC animated movie or a good couple three episodes of Justice League.
I even actually cared about Superman in the movie.
8.5/10 for me
Thinking more about the movie, as a not-completely-causal-but-not-hardcore comics fan, my biggest gripe was related to the BvS fight
I like Batman, he's my favorite DC hero, but him absolutely dominating the fight to the point of being moments away from literally killing Superman was some bullshit
What made their fights in the comics so exciting, in Hush, in Luthor, in N52 Justice League, was the David versus Goliath dynamic. Batman is always on the back foot, either just barely slowing down and distracting Superman or being completely ineffective against him. That's why the Hush fight is so memorable IMO. That "Not him, not now" moment when he realizes Ivy has him under her control. The fact that it's less a fight and more of a Terminator-esque escape of disabling Superman long enough to gain some breathing room. Bruce being on the defensive for 99% of it and only "winning" by going the dirty mind-games route of putting Lois in danger.
Having Batman weaken Superman and then just beat the crap out of him totally missed what makes their battles actually interesting and exciting
But I will say, that one moment when Batman is pounding on Clark's face and the punches grow less effective with each blow was my favorite part of the fight. I think it was the only part that sold the God vs Man billing by showing how ineffective the armor really is against Superman
If I'm being honest I haven't even read any of the reviews posted. I'm aware of the scores and such, but I wanted to go into it without anyone's perceptions in my mind. I did, and I enjoyed the movie. Wouldn't mind seeing again, actually looking forward to that master editiongood general rule is to ignore all reviews, at all costs.
Judge something your self and stop listening to other peoples taste
cyborg was a cool scene reminded me of the Justice league war animated movie
I dunno, I found it very cool.Thinking more about the movie, as a not-completely-causal-but-not-hardcore comics fan, my biggest gripe was related to the BvS fight
I like Batman, he's my favorite DC hero, but him absolutely dominating the fight to the point of being moments away from literally killing Superman was some bullshit
What made their fights in the comics so exciting, in Hush, in Luthor, in N52 Justice League, was the David versus Goliath dynamic. Batman is always on the back foot, either just barely slowing down and distracting Superman or being completely ineffective against him. That's why the Hush fight is so memorable IMO. That "Not him, not now" moment when he realizes Ivy has him under her control. The fact that it's less a fight and more of a Terminator-esque escape of disabling Superman long enough to gain some breathing room. Bruce being on the defensive for 99% of it and only "winning" by going the dirty mind-games route of putting Lois in danger.
Having Batman weaken Superman and then just beat the crap out of him totally missed what makes their battles actually interesting and exciting
But I will say, that one moment when Batman is pounding on Clark's face and the punches grow less effective with each blow was my favorite part of the fight. I think it was the only part that sold the God vs Man billing by showing how ineffective the armor really is against Superman
Non Spoiler version of my impressions!
Below is just my opinion. It is merely me attempting to capture my personal preferences, observations, and my overall experience. You will probably feel different, and that is okay.
I hated the trailers, except for one maybe, but most of them left me disappointed. Explosions, explosions, loud music and some more cgi thrown in. I didn't care for the marketing campaign, and I was afraid this movie would be like any other superhero movie I had seen in the past couple of years, that I'd get a typical opening scene, a typical middle, typical scene transition, typical-- you get where I'm going with this. I didn't get any of this. I got a strange fucking movie. Like REALLY strange. The kind where even I went 'uh, I can't believe they did that'.
I loved this movie.
I've always wanted the bigger superhero movies to get the watchmen treatment, and that's exactly what I got for the first half of this movie. The first half is fucking incredible. I can't believe Snyder got to work on that. Larry Fong cinematography is masterful. The whole Batman introduction is INSANE. There is nothing that could top that for me when it comes to Batman. That was a thing to behold.
The amount of story told SIMPLY through imagery in that first 30-40 minutes is absolutely genius. The editing, I'll get back to this, but in this part of the movie the editing is a work of art. The music, the editing, the cinematography, I felt things. This was Batman being introduced like he should have been.
I felt like I was watching a comic come back to life. That was incredible. I haven't seen anything of the sort in a superhero movie since Watchmen.
As I said before, this was a strange movie. Really strangely put together. It didn't follow any real formula. It was the first superhero movie I've seen in a while where I had no idea whether we were halfway through the movie or whether the ending was nearer. And I fucking loved it. It was such a major deviation. It felt as though someone just wanted to make their own kind of superhero movie. Chris Terrio dug real deep into the DC verse and came up with his own stuff, and Snyder attempted to capture his madness in visual representation. This is the kind of movie you get when you have someone who is an otherwise an incredible writer working with a director with an eye for imagery. And together they come up with some strange fucking shit.
There were some moments where I felt the editing was moving away from some scenes too early. It's a double-edged sword. The editing is what made the first part of the movie work, but at some points it would switch too early. Still a strange way to put together a film. I didn't hate or anything, it was just something I noticed, and don't know how to feel about it.
This movie has some small issues, most of which I've covered in the spoiler thread.
This movie would have worked better if they had done the following:
1.Removed Lex Luthor entirely.
2. Remove Doomsday.
3. Superman's road to redemption in the eyes of the citizens should have been after the senate hearing, and he should have then pledged himself to the American government, which should have lead to him and Batman having some sort of confrontation both of them fully understanding where the other is coming from, but one in which neither can back out from.
4. With that time freed up, I'd have spent another 10 minutes trying to get Batman/Clark/Loise/Martha Kent together at the Kent farm having a lunch and getting to know each other.
5. Some more scenes with Holly Hunter's character. She should have been the one to convince Superman to not subordinate himself to the government any more after she witnesses how human corruption is worse than letting Superman do his own thing.
6.Just a postcredit sequence would have been enough.NO justice league stuff.
There basically shouldn't have been a bad guy in this movie aside from an ideology clash. And guess what, the death count would have been a lot lower too. And you'd have a lot more time to do more things.
This movie feels as though a bunch of comicbook nerds got together and decided to make their own elseworld story. Someone high up took a serious fucking risk. Did you ever expect yourself to see desert Batman being attacked by an army of Superman henchman, whilst fucking PARADEMONS are flying all across and around? But that's exactly what you got. That's fucking incredible,and you got that.
This movie has its flaws, but it is no way a terrible movie the likes of which some people would have you believe. It is mediocre in some aspects, nothing more offensive than what other superhero movies have done to us in the past few years. It is in some major aspects, superior to some of the latest superhero movies we have seen. The director's cut will win more people over, I am sure, it really felt as though there were some things they couldn't fit in there for the sake of timing.
It looks like it is rewatchable. Which for me is the metric of an enjoyable film for me personally. But like all other superhero movies, the big climax at the end the biggest hurdle stopping me from being able to that after a few times. They all have these boring endings, where CGI is just THROWN in your face whether you like it or not. It's a horrible thing they all do nowadays.
Well, the marketing sure fooled him.
Thinking more about the movie, as a not-completely-causal-but-not-hardcore comics fan, my biggest gripe was related to the BvS fight
I like Batman, he's my favorite DC hero, but him absolutely dominating the fight to the point of being moments away from literally killing Superman was some bullshit
What made their fights in the comics so exciting, in Hush, in Luthor, in N52 Justice League, was the David versus Goliath dynamic. Batman is always on the back foot, either just barely slowing down and distracting Superman or being completely ineffective against him. That's why the Hush fight is so memorable IMO. That "Not him, not now" moment when he realizes Ivy has him under her control. The fact that it's less a fight and more of a Terminator-esque escape of disabling Superman long enough to gain some breathing room. Bruce being on the defensive for 99% of it and only "winning" by going the dirty mind-games route of putting Lois in danger.
Having Batman weaken Superman and then just beat the crap out of him totally missed what makes their battles actually interesting and exciting
But I will say, that one moment when Batman is pounding on Clark's face and the punches grow less effective with each blow was my favorite part of the fight. I think it was the only part that sold the God vs Man billing by showing how ineffective the armor really is against Superman
Positive reviews on GAF for this, and in general, are so fucking odd.
"I don't understand these bad reviews. I mean they could have done away with half of the main characters including Eisenberg's Luthor, the dialogue was stilted, the pacing was all jumbled, the characters weren't really given any depth, but man what a tour de force!"
Positive reviews on GAF for this, and in general, are so fucking odd.
"I don't understand these bad reviews. I mean they could have done away with half of the main characters including Eisenberg's Luthor, the dialogue was stilted, the pacing was all jumbled, the characters weren't really given any depth, but man what a tour de force!"
One last thing.
This shot?
![]()
Fuck you. You didn't earn it.
The idea that you have to earn a shot or even a premise of part of a film is baffling to me.I really like this part of your review. Them not earning that shot. By contrast you have this.
![]()
Four years of build up, establishing characters most the public had never even heard up. They earned that shot.
The idea that you have to earn a shot or even a premise of part of a film is baffling to me.