• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

I enjoyed Batman v Superman more than Civil War, who is with me?

Are you with me?


Results are only viewable after voting.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Lol I can't help but look down on anyone who calls civil war a safe movie. That makes no
goddamn sense. It's an empty, frankly pathetic criticism that no one who uses seems to ever elaborate on because it completely falls apart the moment you try to defend it. And I'm expecting we'll see that brain dead complaint more and more, just like the worthless no stakes bullshit.

Safe isn't necessarily bad. It hit all the points it needed to, enough to drown out most criticisms of minor inconsistencies in plot or characterization. It's a popcorn film that succeeds in being just that, especially for new and younger audiences. Like Guardians of the Galaxy.

Wasn't the original comics that it was loosely based on pretty... deep and complicated? I haven't read them so I might be wrong, no idea how things turned out.
 
Aww yiss, Thor 2 the classic.

The benchmark of top end comic book movies.


How good is your movie on a scale from 1 to Thor 2?
 
I voted for Thor because I have yet to watch either. Why did the mod put Thor there, anyway?

Thor is the answer to are we alone in the universe. It will never be forgotten.
 
Safe isn't necessarily bad. It hit all the points it needed to, enough to drown out any criticisms of minor inconsistencies in plot or characterization. It's a popcorn film that succeeds in being just that. Like Guardians of the Galaxy.

Wasn't the original comics that it was loosely based on pretty... deep and complicated? I haven't read them so I might be wrong, no idea how things turned out.
Original comic made Tony a villain and is pretty hater by a lot readers. The movie is much better.
 
The cut scene they immediately put up on YouTube was so stupid to cut out, it's the only thing that helps makes Luthor's rantings make any sense. Especially at the end.

Really should have been two films. The Batman v. Superman court case manipulated from the shadows by Luthor who's revealed at the end or something. THEN do a film where they have to round up the Justice League to stop Luthor's scheme, could still be Doomsday or whatever.

The film has no room to deal with the ramifications of Superman that it wants to because it has to run through all of Lex's crap and Lois' adventure and so on.

Superman's clear "villain" should have just been public opinion, with Batman as the manifestation of that fear and for the punching scenes.

The general audience would be confused though, who's that character we've never seen before... if you're deep in DC lore you'll be like yup that makes more sense!

If you're the general audience and you didn't get that speech at the end where he said something's coming, I don't think that scene is going to help either. Because both scenes would've come at the ending (that cutscene is where he gets arrested).
 
Safe isn't necessarily bad. It hit all the points it needed to, enough to drown out most criticisms of minor inconsistencies in plot or characterization. It's a popcorn film that succeeds in being just that, especially for new and younger audiences. Like Guardians of the Galaxy.

Wasn't the original comics that it was loosely based on pretty... deep and complicated? I haven't read them so I might be wrong, no idea how things turned out.

The original comics resorted to character assassination to force an issue that was so poorly written it needed more retcons to fix the issues it causes. Not unlike BvS. It wasn't deep and complicated: They wanted super heroes to "register" and reveal their identities so that the government could keep tabs.

Civil War comic was awful.
 
What was not safe about it? I only ask because if Civil War is unsafe it kills any argument that BvS was safe since the two share almost identical plot lines. The main difference being quality of execution.

I don't think BvS wast safe either! I also haven't seen that criticism levied against BvS but maybe you have.

But just a few things about Civil War that firmly take it out of this arbitrary "safe" territory

The two biggest stars in the MCU don't end up on the same side

The third act subversion of avoiding a team up against the main villain and avoiding the big blown explosion battle common in CBM finales

Zemo's entire character being a super villain but not a super villain as we've come to expect (yes, I know you don't like him but I also wouldn't call his character safe, even if his motivations feel pedestrian in the golden age of comicbook movies)

The Avengers being fugitives

Rhodey being a goddamn cripple

There's more but that's a start. Like I said though, I don't think BvS was safe either. It was ballsy as hell, it just didn't stick the landing.
 
The general audience would be confused though, who's that character we've never seen before... if you're deep in DC lore you'll be like yup that makes more sense!

If you're the general audience and you didn't get that speech at the end where he said something's coming, I don't think that scene is going to help either. Because both scenes would've come at the ending (that cutscene is where he gets arrested).
Huh, I thought the scene went earlier when Lex was dicking around in the ship learning the Krypton lore and then playing with Zod's body. And then the ship was showing him Yuga Khan and mother boxes which it had told him all about.
 
Im going to go a head and say that Im with you. baby!!!

I recently saw Civil War and what a piece of boring safe ass garbage, I mean wow, if it wasnt for Panther and Spidey it woould have been worse than the low garbage tier of Marvel movies, people are eating this crap tho, so of course it will make a couple of billion or more.

Im not a crazy fanboy that will defend it no matter what, this movie has flaws, editing is garbage, pacing is all over the fucking place, scene transitions are super jarring, jeez, no time to let it flow gracefully etc.

But is not a BORING movie nor a SAFE ASS MOVIE.

Also what the hell at Thor 2 up there on the poll? lmao random.

image.php
 
I have yet to see Civil War, but if it's anything like the first 2 Avengers, BvS is way better to me. I think a lot of it falls on the action and the comedic tone.

The action in the Avengers movies is just so clowny and lightweight. Seeing Captain America throw his shield and watch it bounce off 4-5 guys in random directions took its toll on me in Avengers 2. There's just never any danger. There's also a dream sequence where Tony sees all the dead Avengers in a pile and not a single one is bleeding. Finally he stares at Captain America long enough and he finally gets a nose bleed. There is just no weight behind anything and that makes it hard to care.

You fears are correct, i too wasnt looking forward to this after too many Cap/Marvel films, it's just as you'd expect. But the odds are smaller.

CW is the second real Marvel "film", after TWS. The way they managed stakes was really great and admirable, I never thought I was going to see that. The final act is second only to TDK in the genre imo. Go see it, it's a different breed of Marvel movie.
It's not, its the same shit as Avengers, nothing remotely different to offset the god mode characters without the slightest hint of a real threat. The ending makes the whole struggle pointless.
 
Huh, I thought the scene went earlier when Lex was dicking around in the ship learning the Krypton lore and then playing with Zod's body. And then the ship was showing him Yuga Khan and mother boxes which it had told him all about.

Right at the beginning you see a SWAT team come in and Yuga Khan disappears while Lex is surrounded by the SWAT team at gun point. He's also standing infront of that giant exploded bubble thing that Doomsday came out of.
 
I don't think BvS wasn't safe either! I also haven't seen that criticism levied against BvS but maybe you have.

But just a few things about Civil War that firmly take it out of this arbitrary "safe" territory

The two biggest stars in the MCU don't end up on the same side

The third act subversion of avoiding a team up against the main villain

Zemo's entire character being a super villain but not a super villain as we've come to expect (yes, I know you don't like him but I also wouldn't call his character safe, even if his motivations feel pedestrian in the golden age of comicbook movies)

The Avengers being fugitives

Rhodey being a goddamn cripple

There's more but that's a start. Like I said though, I don't think BvS was safe either. It was ballsy as hell, it just didn't stick the landing.

Nah, you should know by now I always give you the benefit of the doubt. There are people who call BvS safe though. Some in this very thread. I agree with your points here.
 
Right at the beginning you see a SWAT team come in and Yuga Khan disappears while Lex is surrounded by the SWAT team at gun point. He's also standing infront of that giant exploded bubble thing that Doomsday came out of.
Huh, I admit I didn't bother to look the scene back up on YouTube before pontificating.

Would have made more sense where I put it lol.

Isn't it steppenwolf?
It's probably Darkseid so he doesn't look like Thanos.
 
ok. civil war is by a different director.

this thread is about subjective comparison between civil war and bvs. what is with people coming in this thread who preemptively say they won't like civil war without even seeing it?

It's a comic book movie versus thread, which makes it a cesspool for hyperbole and ignorance.

I thoroughly enjoyed Civil War and hated BVS, although I wanted to like it. Everytime I would try to make reasons to like BVS, the movie seemed insistent on doing something that would make me hate it, whereas Civil War would have a few sequences that dragged on that made me skeptical of the hype and then totally paid off for me later in the movie.

I give CW an 8.5/10 and BVS a 4.5/10. Both of them tackle the same theme of heroes owning up to mass destruction culminating in a hero on hero brawl, but CW just does this exponentially better in execution.

The battle in BVS doesn't feel earned and is totally not a battle of ideologies, which is essential for a fight like this. Supes is basically blackmailed into fighting Batman and refuses to talk to him after his initial try. Batman is irrationally mad at Supes and creates a disconnect between the audience and the character. The battle itself is serviceable but underwhelming and the dialogue in it is garbage.

In CW's airport battle, the conflict is earned and the movie sets up logical motivations for the characters to behave the way they do. Also the battle is just executed way better.

I didn't care for either "main villain" but Zemo had a stronger screen presence than Lex. Neither plan really makes that much sense but at Zemo has the benefit of not being this annoyingly erratic character who made you want to punch him in the face everytime he opened his mouth.
 
Heres a list of Bullshit that was in the BvS movie:

-The scene in Africa is stupid beyond belief. Why is Lois alive as a witness? Why does Superman get blamed for the deaths considering he doesn't need to use bullets?

-Lois and Clark bathtub scene. Did the conversation have to take place their?

-When Lex puts a toffee in the Senators mouth. Is this really Lex's attitude?

-The entire Useless Kryptonite chase sequence was embedded in the movie just for a 30 second confrontation between B and S?

-Lex starts killing his assistants now? (Mercy)

-Why would Batman leave his Batarang after stealing the Kryptonite

-Lex's access to the ship via a thin layer of epidermis is laughable.

-Lex's plan to persuade Superman to battle Batman was coincidently just when he kidnapped Martha?

-Superman cant use his X-ray vision to locate Martha?

-Lex gets his design team to associate logos to the justice league members. WUT. Also, unveiling the justice league members through email...in a movie? Really?

-During the Batman v Superman fight, Batman could have used his Kryptonite bullets/ spear to kill superman while he was stunned...but no.

-Lois throwing the spear and then retrieving it (WHAT?). and some how deducing that the spear kills Doomsday. How does she even know this considering she didn't even see Doomsday?

-Why the hell didn't Batman retrieve the spear (maybe using the Bat plane?) instead of luring Doomsday back to the original location?

-Also, as HISHE explained. Superman and Doomsday were in space. Why didn't he just throw that monstrosity into space?

-Lois being the Damsel in distress and Superman saving her.

-Lex being so obsessed with Superman's death he will forgo his own security by unleashing Doomsday in front of himself and Superman.

-Why the hell was the death of Superman even needed considering he is revived? Maybe this alleviates Batmans sadism by applying a no kill rule? Who the hell knows.

-Lastly...DING DING DING DING DING!

Some of the point as I have made could be explained. But most of them are borderline stupid. However, I liked Batmans realisation of both monsters sharing the name Martha.

Overall, I understand why some people like the movie. But calling it the best comic book movie ever made or comparing it to Marvels strongest offerings is foolish.
 
Disclaimer: I never really read a comic book, just some bits and pieces recently.

I have been to Civil War first and it was really great, Batman v Superman somehow wasn't on my radar at all, watched it with 0 expectations and shit that movie is hot fire, I pretty much liked everything about it.

I re-watched lots of MCU movies recently so maybe it was just the darker tone for a change, but I fucking love the MCU, all of it.

I thought Man of Steel was mediocre, but yeah I liked Bat Affleck and Superman was also way more interesting this time around, didn't even know about
Wonder Woman and Doomsday, that was a really nice surprise.
Some of those scenes were just breathtaking. When you saw
the Flash
I lost it, I really didn't expect that.

It surprised me more often than Civil War did, that's for sure and not just with who was in the movie, I need to watch both again, but for now BvS comes out on top, not by far or anything, but I just enjoyed it more.


OP, I went into the film blind without having watched any of the trailers, aside from some minor spoilers found in headlines on the film blogs I follow. Otherwise, I'm 100% with you. The film surprised me tons; it metamorphosed the characters, it was charged with a kind of maturity found in early Ridley Scott or David Fincher. The musical crescendo's were ace, the cameos were slick. Never once did the film lose my attention. It was only upon my third viewing where I noticed that the first 90 minutes was perhaps too intricate, and could agree that it was "plodding." But that was because I was sitting with my mother, and she whispered, "where the fuck is the action at?" And on that front, it sure delivered.

There's a lot to unpack from the film, and there's promise in the franchise. Can't wait for SS, Wondy, and Justice League.
 
Nah, you should know by now I always give you the benefit of the doubt. There are people who call BvS safe though. Some in this very thread. I agree with your points here.

*brofist*

Neither BvS or Civil War should be described as "safe." I can see why someone would call both of them boring but that's a much more subjective judgement.
 
The original comics resorted to character assassination to force an issue that was so poorly written it needed more retcons to fix the issues it causes. Not unlike BvS. It wasn't deep and complicated: They wanted super heroes to "register" and reveal their identities so that the government could keep tabs.

Civil War comic was awful.

Good to know. I've heard people talking about it a lot, usually in a positive light so I just figured. Was
On More/Brand New Day
the retcon you're referring to? Because I have heard horrible opinions regarding that.

If the movie was working with bad source material, I can understand why they went the route they did. The government oversight stuff sorta backseats during the second half.
 
Good to know. I've heard people talking about it a lot, usually in a positive light so I just figured. Was
On More/Brand New Day
the retcon you're referring to? Because I have heard horrible opinions regarding that.

That, and what they did to Tony to make him pretty much the villain. Stuff like making clones of heroes, just in general being a super asshole to justify the "event" for Marvel.

It was awful. Spidey took an awful hit because of that fiasco. :/
 
Safe isn't necessarily bad. It hit all the points it needed to, enough to drown out most criticisms of minor inconsistencies in plot or characterization. It's a popcorn film that succeeds in being just that, especially for new and younger audiences. Like Guardians of the Galaxy.

Wasn't the original comics that it was loosely based on pretty... deep and complicated? I haven't read them so I might be wrong, no idea how things turned out.
The original Civil War comics were a goddamn mess of utterly botched characterization and stupid plotting.
 
What was not safe about it? I only ask because if Civil War is unsafe it kills any argument that BvS was safe since the two share almost identical plot lines. The main difference being quality of execution.
I am glad I was not the only one that noticed it, but the reason for the fight was actually a good one unlike BvS.
I would not call BvS safe though, just dull.
 
I am glad I was not the only one that noticed it, but the reason for the fight was actually a good one unlike BvS.
I would not call BvS safe though, just dull.

BvS's weak link for me was the reason Batman and Superman fought. That really sucked when they had already set up a much better one.
 
Disclaimer: I never really read a comic book, just some bits and pieces recently.

I have been to Civil War first and it was really great, Batman v Superman somehow wasn't on my radar at all, watched it with 0 expectations and shit that movie is hot fire, I pretty much liked everything about it.

I re-watched lots of MCU movies recently so maybe it was just the darker tone for a change, but I fucking love the MCU, all of it.

I thought Man of Steel was mediocre, but yeah I liked Bat Affleck and Superman was also way more interesting this time around, didn't even know about
Wonder Woman and Doomsday, that was a really nice surprise.
Some of those scenes were just breathtaking. When you saw
the Flash
I lost it, I really didn't expect that.

It surprised me more often than Civil War did, that's for sure and not just with who was in the movie, I need to watch both again, but for now BvS comes out on top, not by far or anything, but I just enjoyed it more.

I enjoyed more than all the mcu movies except winter soldier ( Haven't seen civil war yet.)
 
Lol

There are already 1,000's of reviews that would answer your question.

It got way more shit than it deserved, but that is my opinion, I'd pay money to browse GAF in a reality where BvS got decent reviews, I wonder how many people think for themselves.
 
hqdefault.jpg


Let me count the ways.

You are aware this is not actually a response, right?

Insulting people who disagree with you will get you far here.

Of all the BvS threads you've been in I'm surprised you seem to think talking like that leads to anything. How many people on either side of the argument about BvS have insulted the other? How many of those people received some sort of penalty/punishment?
 
I enjoyed it over civil war as well. Critisms for BvS that I constantly hear like "editing"," grimdark", "Martha"," flash scene", are things I didn't have a problem with. I liked the dark tone of BvS as you don't get that in the safe comic book movies of today aimed at children. So it was really refreshing watching a superhero film more for adults and wished they went for that R rating.

Also I don't care to argue with anyone over my opinion or how I'm objectively wrong. People like different things and that's OK, just because your opinion is in the majority doesn't make it fact.

I feel like the issue is not people liking the movie, but pretending the movie is without flaws. You mentioned some issues and that they dont bother you, and thats fine. It would be more problematic if you went on a rant on how people are making up flaws in the movie.
 
Insulting people who disagree with you will get you far here.

apparently yes, but I did not really insult anyone, certainly not directly, even though I was. I'm just wondering how much impact reviews have on the concensus.

Well take a look at the poll at least I'm not the only "insert insult" on GAF.
 
It got way more shit than it deserved, but that is my opinion, I'd pay money to browse GAF in a reality where BvS got decent reviews, I wonder how many people think for themselves.
Definitely with you on this one. The conversation would be totally different.
 
You are aware this is not actually a response, right?

You are aware that posting a picture of a cartoon rabbit reading a love letter to his cartoon human wife written crudely on Marvin Acme's will, itself written in ACME Disappearing-Reappearing ink and deeming the ownership of Toon Town return to the Toons that inhabit it in the case of his death which in this case happened at the hands of Judge Doom who is actually an evil Toon and killed Eddie Valiant's brother with a piano and a cartoon shoe with a barrel of Dip may possibly indicate that my post was not intended as an in-depth response and more of a jape?
 
It got way more shit than it deserved, but that is my opinion, I'd pay money to browse GAF in a reality where BvS got decent reviews, I wonder how many people think for themselves.

you're not exactly seen as a paragon of objective analysis when you praise a Snyder movie while you're posting with a watchmen avatar, buddy
 
My biggest problem with BvS was the animosity between Batman and Superman. I know this was probably because of poor editing (I've read that there were scenes removes that would have made this at least somewhat clearer), but to me it ended up relying more on "Superman is a walking nuke and Batman donkey punches bad guys and carves dickbutt into their faces". Which honestly isn't terrible as plot motivations go, but it just seemed so forced in the actual moments.

It reminded me of the disdain between Chris and Jake in RE6. Chris hates Jake for being Wesker's son and Jake hates Chris for killing Wesker... even though Jake remarks that he only ever knew his father as a deadbeat who left him and his mom to fend for themselves. And then he learns that Wesker was a complete global saturation psychopath and yet still he wanted to end Chris.

Like, we the long-time fans know why they may not like each other. Same with Bats and Supes. But the media doesn't necessarily do enough to convince us of it. Or maybe it did, but lost in translation et al.
 
I voted for Thor because I have yet to watch either. Why did the mod put Thor there, anyway?

Joke answer that these polls always have. Dark World was notoriously bad.

That being said, I voted for it since it was still better than BvS.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom