Lol I can't help but look down on anyone who calls civil war a safe movie. That makes no
goddamn sense. It's an empty, frankly pathetic criticism that no one who uses seems to ever elaborate on because it completely falls apart the moment you try to defend it. And I'm expecting we'll see that brain dead complaint more and more, just like the worthless no stakes bullshit.
That says a lot considering they reduced the most emotionally charged fight in the history of comic books to nothing.
I voted for Thor because I have yet to watch either. Why did the mod put Thor there, anyway?
Original comic made Tony a villain and is pretty hater by a lot readers. The movie is much better.Safe isn't necessarily bad. It hit all the points it needed to, enough to drown out any criticisms of minor inconsistencies in plot or characterization. It's a popcorn film that succeeds in being just that. Like Guardians of the Galaxy.
Wasn't the original comics that it was loosely based on pretty... deep and complicated? I haven't read them so I might be wrong, no idea how things turned out.
I voted for Thor because I have yet to watch either. Why did the mod put Thor there, anyway?
The cut scene they immediately put up on YouTube was so stupid to cut out, it's the only thing that helps makes Luthor's rantings make any sense. Especially at the end.
Really should have been two films. The Batman v. Superman court case manipulated from the shadows by Luthor who's revealed at the end or something. THEN do a film where they have to round up the Justice League to stop Luthor's scheme, could still be Doomsday or whatever.
The film has no room to deal with the ramifications of Superman that it wants to because it has to run through all of Lex's crap and Lois' adventure and so on.
Superman's clear "villain" should have just been public opinion, with Batman as the manifestation of that fear and for the punching scenes.
Loki did it.I voted for Thor because I have yet to watch either. Why did the mod put Thor there, anyway?
Safe isn't necessarily bad. It hit all the points it needed to, enough to drown out most criticisms of minor inconsistencies in plot or characterization. It's a popcorn film that succeeds in being just that, especially for new and younger audiences. Like Guardians of the Galaxy.
Wasn't the original comics that it was loosely based on pretty... deep and complicated? I haven't read them so I might be wrong, no idea how things turned out.
What was not safe about it? I only ask because if Civil War is unsafe it kills any argument that BvS was safe since the two share almost identical plot lines. The main difference being quality of execution.
Huh, I thought the scene went earlier when Lex was dicking around in the ship learning the Krypton lore and then playing with Zod's body. And then the ship was showing him Yuga Khan and mother boxes which it had told him all about.The general audience would be confused though, who's that character we've never seen before... if you're deep in DC lore you'll be like yup that makes more sense!
If you're the general audience and you didn't get that speech at the end where he said something's coming, I don't think that scene is going to help either. Because both scenes would've come at the ending (that cutscene is where he gets arrested).
Isn't it steppenwolf?Huh, I thought the scene went earlier when Lex was dicking around in the ship learning the Krypton lore and then playing with Zod's body. And then the ship was showing him Yuga Khan and mother boxes which it had told him all about.
Im going to go a head and say that Im with you. baby!!!
I recently saw Civil War and what a piece of boring safe ass garbage, I mean wow, if it wasnt for Panther and Spidey it woould have been worse than the low garbage tier of Marvel movies, people are eating this crap tho, so of course it will make a couple of billion or more.
Im not a crazy fanboy that will defend it no matter what, this movie has flaws, editing is garbage, pacing is all over the fucking place, scene transitions are super jarring, jeez, no time to let it flow gracefully etc.
But is not a BORING movie nor a SAFE ASS MOVIE.
Also what the hell at Thor 2 up there on the poll? lmao random.
I have yet to see Civil War, but if it's anything like the first 2 Avengers, BvS is way better to me. I think a lot of it falls on the action and the comedic tone.
The action in the Avengers movies is just so clowny and lightweight. Seeing Captain America throw his shield and watch it bounce off 4-5 guys in random directions took its toll on me in Avengers 2. There's just never any danger. There's also a dream sequence where Tony sees all the dead Avengers in a pile and not a single one is bleeding. Finally he stares at Captain America long enough and he finally gets a nose bleed. There is just no weight behind anything and that makes it hard to care.
It's not, its the same shit as Avengers, nothing remotely different to offset the god mode characters without the slightest hint of a real threat. The ending makes the whole struggle pointless.CW is the second real Marvel "film", after TWS. The way they managed stakes was really great and admirable, I never thought I was going to see that. The final act is second only to TDK in the genre imo. Go see it, it's a different breed of Marvel movie.
Huh, I thought the scene went earlier when Lex was dicking around in the ship learning the Krypton lore and then playing with Zod's body. And then the ship was showing him Yuga Khan and mother boxes which it had told him all about.
I don't think BvS wasn't safe either! I also haven't seen that criticism levied against BvS but maybe you have.
But just a few things about Civil War that firmly take it out of this arbitrary "safe" territory
The two biggest stars in the MCU don't end up on the same side
The third act subversion of avoiding a team up against the main villain
Zemo's entire character being a super villain but not a super villain as we've come to expect (yes, I know you don't like him but I also wouldn't call his character safe, even if his motivations feel pedestrian in the golden age of comicbook movies)
The Avengers being fugitives
Rhodey being a goddamn cripple
There's more but that's a start. Like I said though, I don't think BvS was safe either. It was ballsy as hell, it just didn't stick the landing.
Huh, I admit I didn't bother to look the scene back up on YouTube before pontificating.Right at the beginning you see a SWAT team come in and Yuga Khan disappears while Lex is surrounded by the SWAT team at gun point. He's also standing infront of that giant exploded bubble thing that Doomsday came out of.
It's probably Darkseid so he doesn't look like Thanos.Isn't it steppenwolf?
ok. civil war is by a different director.
this thread is about subjective comparison between civil war and bvs. what is with people coming in this thread who preemptively say they won't like civil war without even seeing it?
I voted for Thor because I have yet to watch either. Why did the mod put Thor there, anyway?
Disclaimer: I never really read a comic book, just some bits and pieces recently.
I have been to Civil War first and it was really great, Batman v Superman somehow wasn't on my radar at all, watched it with 0 expectations and shit that movie is hot fire, I pretty much liked everything about it.
I re-watched lots of MCU movies recently so maybe it was just the darker tone for a change, but I fucking love the MCU, all of it.
I thought Man of Steel was mediocre, but yeah I liked Bat Affleck and Superman was also way more interesting this time around, didn't even know aboutSome of those scenes were just breathtaking. When you sawWonder Woman and Doomsday, that was a really nice surprise.I lost it, I really didn't expect that.the Flash
It surprised me more often than Civil War did, that's for sure and not just with who was in the movie, I need to watch both again, but for now BvS comes out on top, not by far or anything, but I just enjoyed it more.
Nah, you should know by now I always give you the benefit of the doubt. There are people who call BvS safe though. Some in this very thread. I agree with your points here.
The original comics resorted to character assassination to force an issue that was so poorly written it needed more retcons to fix the issues it causes. Not unlike BvS. It wasn't deep and complicated: They wanted super heroes to "register" and reveal their identities so that the government could keep tabs.
Civil War comic was awful.
Good to know. I've heard people talking about it a lot, usually in a positive light so I just figured. Wasthe retcon you're referring to? Because I have heard horrible opinions regarding that.On More/Brand New Day
The original Civil War comics were a goddamn mess of utterly botched characterization and stupid plotting.Safe isn't necessarily bad. It hit all the points it needed to, enough to drown out most criticisms of minor inconsistencies in plot or characterization. It's a popcorn film that succeeds in being just that, especially for new and younger audiences. Like Guardians of the Galaxy.
Wasn't the original comics that it was loosely based on pretty... deep and complicated? I haven't read them so I might be wrong, no idea how things turned out.
I am glad I was not the only one that noticed it, but the reason for the fight was actually a good one unlike BvS.What was not safe about it? I only ask because if Civil War is unsafe it kills any argument that BvS was safe since the two share almost identical plot lines. The main difference being quality of execution.
I am glad I was not the only one that noticed it, but the reason for the fight was actually a good one unlike BvS.
I would not call BvS safe though, just dull.
someone please tell me what is so terrible about BvS?
Disclaimer: I never really read a comic book, just some bits and pieces recently.
I have been to Civil War first and it was really great, Batman v Superman somehow wasn't on my radar at all, watched it with 0 expectations and shit that movie is hot fire, I pretty much liked everything about it.
I re-watched lots of MCU movies recently so maybe it was just the darker tone for a change, but I fucking love the MCU, all of it.
I thought Man of Steel was mediocre, but yeah I liked Bat Affleck and Superman was also way more interesting this time around, didn't even know aboutSome of those scenes were just breathtaking. When you sawWonder Woman and Doomsday, that was a really nice surprise.I lost it, I really didn't expect that.the Flash
It surprised me more often than Civil War did, that's for sure and not just with who was in the movie, I need to watch both again, but for now BvS comes out on top, not by far or anything, but I just enjoyed it more.
someone please tell me what is so terrible about BvS?
Lol
There are already 1,000's of reviews that would answer your question.
It got way more shit than it deserved, but that is my opinion, I'd pay money to browse GAF in a reality where BvS got decent reviews, I wonder how many people think for themselves.
![]()
Let me count the ways.
Insulting people who disagree with you will get you far here.
I enjoyed it over civil war as well. Critisms for BvS that I constantly hear like "editing"," grimdark", "Martha"," flash scene", are things I didn't have a problem with. I liked the dark tone of BvS as you don't get that in the safe comic book movies of today aimed at children. So it was really refreshing watching a superhero film more for adults and wished they went for that R rating.
Also I don't care to argue with anyone over my opinion or how I'm objectively wrong. People like different things and that's OK, just because your opinion is in the majority doesn't make it fact.
You are aware this is not actually a response, right?
Insulting people who disagree with you will get you far here.
Fucking nobody. Get your head checked
Definitely with you on this one. The conversation would be totally different.It got way more shit than it deserved, but that is my opinion, I'd pay money to browse GAF in a reality where BvS got decent reviews, I wonder how many people think for themselves.
You are aware this is not actually a response, right?
It got way more shit than it deserved, but that is my opinion, I'd pay money to browse GAF in a reality where BvS got decent reviews, I wonder how many people think for themselves.
The fact that your willing to do this just for reviews is crayIt got way more shit than it deserved, but that is my opinion, I'd pay money to browse GAF in a reality where BvS got decent reviews, I wonder how many people think for themselves.
It got way more shit than it deserved, but that is my opinion, I'd pay money to browse GAF in a reality where BvS got decent reviews, I wonder how many people think for themselves.
I voted for Thor because I have yet to watch either. Why did the mod put Thor there, anyway?
The fact that your willing to do this just for reviews is cray