I may have played some duds, but honestly I can't remember them - primarily because I don't spend a significant amount of time on games I'm not enjoying. I tend to move on rather quickly, and I'd rather replay old games I enjoy than playing new games I'm not enjoying. And I've done that so many times, honestly.So you’ve had a perfect record since childhood? I might have enjoyed some games as a child but even I can admit some of them were just average or shitty games back then because I had nothing else to play at the time.
Some people praised it so much. I thought it'd be the usual Insomniac game (fun and well-made). I bought it but was so thoroughly disappointed.
![]()
Hang on...
![]()
Let me get this straight. You spent a total of thirty six minutes with the game, then came to the ultimate conclusion that it was undisputedly and undeniably not even worth a playthrough?
Forgive me, but that is a really shallow and unthorough assessment. You can't possibly know if a game is completely disappointing for sure within such a short timeframe. That's no better than what average gaming critic is doing whenever they're reviewing a game and squeeze out a random number score while sitting on the can.
I understand your point, but tbh, there are way too many (excellent) games to play nowadays -- especially with the limited time one usually has. Unless a game is able to grab my attention right away, it makes it tough for me to justify spending more time on something I'm not enjoying rather than playing another game that I would enjoy more.
I'd have stuck with it for a few hours if there were at least a couple of things that I liked. Unfortunately (for me), there wasn't even a single thing I liked about that game.
Embarrassed to admit this one to y’all, but Maplestory. Wayyyyy more than 40 hours though…I will not even attempt to estimate it or the real world money I spent.
Don’t give me too much shit! I was much younger…and dumb.
![]()
This is so interesting to me. Even as a kid I had moments where I used my allowance to buy a game like Resident Evil 0. Even though I was annoyed with multiple aspects of the game I still played it for hours because I felt I wanted to get my money’s worth since I used all of my allowance on the game, and on top of that I didn’t have much else to play.I may have played some duds, but honestly I can't remember them - primarily because I don't spend a significant amount of time on games I'm not enjoying. I tend to move on rather quickly, and I'd rather replay old games I enjoy than playing new games I'm not enjoying. And I've done that so many times, honestly.
Just a couple of months ago, I dropped Judgment and Medium (both new games for me) because I wasn't enjoying them and instead replayed Uncharted Lost Legacy for the 3rd time and had a blast.
So, in summary, I have fewer regrets and (close to a) "perfect record" because I don't hesitate when it comes to dropping a game. Sometimes, I can be too harsh and too quick, but the positive is that it keeps gaming enjoyable for me.
As I said, I may very well have played duds in the past. I've been gaming since I was 3 years old, and honestly, it's hard to remember the stuff I didn't enjoy at that time.This is so interesting to me. Even as a kid I had moments where I used my allowance to buy a game like Resident Evil 0. Even though I was annoyed with multiple aspects of the game I still played it for hours because I felt I wanted to get my money’s worth since I used all of my allowance on the game, and on top of that I didn’t have much else to play.
Also when hanging out my friends and I would play different games of different quality for hours. I remember one of the games we used to play was one of the crappy Acclaim WWF (or maybe WCW) games and we would still have play it because we all liked wrestling at the time and that was the only wrestling game we had around at the time, and even though we knew the game was kind of crappy we’d still try different things in it.
If you can’t remember those few duds/regrets that’s fair, but at least they actually happened. I guess up until I reached a certain age to where I was paying more attention to reviews and online forums, gaming was a Wild West situation for me, where I just wasn’t sure what quality of game I would end up with after buying it. It’s interesting that others were way more cautious about which games they played at such an early age.
Persona 5
I tend to avoid bad games, so that's the only one that springs to mind that has disappointed me recently.
Why would you play something more than 1-2 hours if it was bad?
Fortnite... both save the world and battle Royale.Instead of thinking of a single player game, name a multiplayer game that you've sank 40 hours into and regretted it when it was all said and done.
Same situation here. I did complete Persona 4 but it was quite painful near the end.I cant finish a Persona or Xenoblade game. I dont think I made it 20 hrs in Persona though, and I actually really like most of the Xenoblade games. Just needs a couple slight changes. I played Xenoblade X and 2 for over 40 hrs for sure.
Came here for Valhalla. I had a bizarre relationship with this game. Playing it 60-80 hours, while hating every moment, purely because I've rinsed nearly every game in the series. Everything about the game was wrong and fucking stupid and when you finally get to the end you're told to keep playing to get more endings. So it gets to be the Assassin's Creed game where I learnt to hate the series. Mirage would be an ideal u-turn on the series, but I doubt those changes are gonna stick.I replayed Death Stranding's first 10 hours like 3 separate times across months before I finally stuck it out. Ended up enjoying my experience, but those first few times I just didn't get the fervor for it.
Also nominate Assassin's Creed Odyssey and AC: Valhalla. I put like 40+ hours into Odyssey and felt like it was such a chore but kept doing it until I saw the ending. I know I spent even more time with Valhalla and it really felt like that game was 2 times bigger than it needed to be and I got to conquering the last area and just gave up, didn't even finish the game but I know it's got to be at least 60+hours into Valhalla.
That's paradise compared to Witcher 1's guitar hero combat.The Witcher 3 with their dumbest combat ever, luckily i only wasted 20hrs to that shit
Some people dislike weighty gameplay and niko was arguably the worst controlling character of all the rockstar games that use euphoria.I’m genuinely curios what was it that made you not enjoy IV.
V can fuck right off, that game is ass (IMO)
I mean, you get new weapons and skills by exploring and finding the arks...RAGE 2
I line open world games and Rage 2 was meh because the empty open world but I always was exploring trying to find something new altought I knew the world was empty
Overwatch 2. That game is ass. I only played it because people I know play it.
Castlevania sotn absolutely annihilates it in every aspect.I agree. I really enjoy a good metroidvania, but this one felt boring in every way other than combat. And way too long for this type of game.