• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Monitoring the situation in Iran

SCOTUS overtuned only IEEPA tariffs that amounted to 20% of all the tariffs.
It's not the same thing. Indians stopped buying oil when tariffs rose to 50%.

And shadow fleet means nothing as the ships are being seized.
I think you missed a number: one thousand tankers.

Cool and all but for that you need the EU consensus and they won't get it.
You can be sure that if there is a need, there will be consensus. They bought oil and gas for two or three years after the war began.

Patriot missiles and such are effective against missiles.
Which fly to Ukraine daily by the dozens.
 
SGxkD5id5g2mZRV4.jpeg
 
No dispelling, from my reading of the book. There are no "thou shalt not commit slavery" and "thou shalt not rape other people" commandments, while God does instruct his chosen people to destroy and enslave their competitors.

While there is a "thou shalt not murder", this seems to contradict God's documented instructions to genocide surrounding peoples. It also seems a touch hypocritical that this is being commanded by the same God who ultrakilled the entire world except for Noah that one time, and also offed every single first born child of Egypt for unjustified reasons.

And then promised to never do it again.

If you actually read the Bible, not like how many atheist and liberals have "read the Bible" from Facebook snippets, you will see that the Old Testament mentions many times God's anger towards humans.

It is also written as a story front to back, so when the Ten Commandments are written, what happens before and after that matter, chronologically, because God changes his ways of dealing with humans throughout the Old Testament.

And trying to infer hypocrisy for Christian beliefs while handwaving CHRIST arrival and subsequent teachings isn't going to fly for anyone of faith or, again, who actually has read the Bible - because it's quite clear. The reason the OT is still valid for us is because it is foundational. But the New Testament is what forges us as Christians.

Even referring back to your Ten Commandments argument, semantic games seem silly. He does dispel virtually all the points you noted, just because it isn't in your modern language doesn't make it hard to understand what is clearly being transcribed.
 
Last edited:
No comparison in this aspect.

Ukrainians wanted to be closer to the west (and join EU) after seeing how backwards their country (rules by pro Russian governments) is compared to other countries that were in the Eastern block with them (and now have GDP per capita few times higher than them). There weren't attacking other countries, raping women, torturing civilians (including kids), leveling cities, attacking maternity hospitals (full of pregnant women) and kidnapping children...

This is what Russia is doing since this war started. They are EVIL in every sense of this word.
Like I said the west pushed for this conflict for years, if you do not see this I can't help you.
 
It's not the same thing. Indians stopped buying oil when tariffs rose to 50%.
It has nothing to do with SCOTUS though.

I think you missed a number: one thousand tankers.
Tthe choking points - straits for example are being monitored. European countries - and Turkey - just did not engage much with that before.

They bought oil and gas for two or three years after the war began.
Mainly Germany though.

Which fly to Ukraine daily by the dozens.
Drones, not missiles. Russia does not that many ballistic missiles in comparison to Iran for example.

In any case, the regional situation will be worse in the baltic and black see. Turkish stream should watch out.
 
And then promised to never do it again.
As if that makes it better?
(alternate answer: Until He did genocide humans again.)


If you actually read the Bible, not like how many atheist and liberals have "read the Bible" from Facebook snippets, you will see that the Old Testament mentions many times God's anger towards humans.

It is also written as a story front to back, so when the Ten Commandments are written, what happens before and after that matter, chronologically, because God changes his ways of dealing with humans throughout the Old Testament.

And trying to perpetuate Christian beliefs while handwaving CHRIST arrival and subsequent teachings isn't going to fly for anyone of faith or, again, who actually has read the Bible - because it's quite clear. The reason the OT is still valid for us is because it is foundational. But the New Testament is what forges us as Christians.

Respectfully, none of these are rebuttals to my points, and are more arguments from feelings and faith, not literature.

Even referring back to your Ten Commandments argument, semantic games seem silly.

I'm not playing semantic games. I'm literally quoting the book.
 
Last edited:
Which fly to Ukraine daily by the dozens.

They certainly don't have the capacity to fire dozens of advanced ballistic missiles daily.

Like I said the west pushed for this conflict for years, if you do not see this I can't help you.

Not sure where you were radicalized and misinformed, but the west desperately tried to avert the invasion.
Putin lied repeatedly at every forum that an invasion was on the cards. Even a week to the invasion. Macron and others all but begged him to reconsider.

Anyone pushing the "Ukraine provoked Russia" angle is just a useful idiot for the Kremlin.

Even now, Putin has absolutely no interest in a peace deal and his demands are carefully tailored to steal Ukrainian territory and leave them defenseless for future attacks.
 
Last edited:
Russia started this conflict. No one forced them to do that.
You have a very narrow uninformed view of the conflict and are focusing on the symptom rather than the cause. Like I said previously, watch this video to gain some further insight. I am not condoning what either side has done during the conflict, and feel very sorry for the innocents dragged into all this.

 
How France handles Senegalese murderers.


Legally if you are not convicted because they want to hospitalize you instead it normally means that they are going to lock you up, pump you full of really shitty drugs, and throw away the key. It is not a soft alternative. If you had a lawyer they probably wouldn't recommend it.
 
They certainly don't have the capacity to fire dozens of advanced ballistic missiles daily.



Not sure where you were radicalized and misinformed, but the west desperately tried to avert the invasion.
Putin lied repeatedly at every forum that an invasion was on the cards. Even a week to the invasion. Macron and others all but begged him to reconsider.

Anyone pushing the "Ukraine provoked Russia" angle is just a useful idiot for the Kremlin.
Of course they did ... Just like the US invaded Iraq for legitimate reasons.. lol
 
Last edited:
You have a very narrow uninformed view of the conflict and are focusing on the symptom rather than the cause. Like I said previously, watch this video to gain some further insight. I am not condoning what either side has done during the conflict, and feel very sorry for the innocents dragged into all this.




Anyone quoting Jeffrey Sachs has already lost by default 🤣

 
Last edited:
Christianity was a justification in both the pro-slavery and the anti-slavery camps so they cancel each other out.
Nope, because slavery was the default status throughout human history with or without 'justification' from Christianity, and then Christianity was monumental in ending it and in enforcing its end as far as possible.

It is like placing a grain of sand on one side of the scale, a concrete block on the other side of the scale and declaring them to cancel each other out. They do not.
 
Anyone quoting Jeffrey Sachs has already lost by default 🤣

Yes, because people that to not agree with him have no agenda whatsoever..
 
You have a very narrow uninformed view of the conflict and are focusing on the symptom rather than the cause. Like I said previously, watch this video to gain some further insight. I am not condoning what either side has done during the conflict, and feel very sorry for the innocents dragged into all this.



You are eating up some Russian propaganda.

I live relatively close to Ukraine, we have seen first hand what happened between Russia and Ukraine in the last ~35 years. Ukraine wanted to get closer to the west to finally start developing. Russia sees this as threat and wants to force them to stay inside their sphere of influence, that's why this conflict started.

But this was purely motivated by economy, no one in the west pushed for any kind of war, there was close to zero percent chance that Ukraine would ever enter NATO. And road to EU would be quite long (Ukraine would have to improve a lot of things to be able to join).

Georgia also didn't want to attack Russia in 2008...
 
Last edited:
Nope, because slavery was the default status throughout human history with or without 'justification' from Christianity, and then Christianity was monumental in ending it and in enforcing its end as far as possible.

It is like placing a grain of sand on one side of the scale, a concrete block on the other side of the scale and declaring them to cancel each other out. They do not.

That doesn't make any sense. If you want to be someone who touts Judeo-Christian teachings as the pillar and foundation of our culture, then you need to acknowledge how much that contributed to the normalization of slavery. Yes, everyone did it, and that's why it's allowed in the Bible. Because everyone did it. This is a very common apologetic talking point. Christianity itself doesn't get any special brownie points when both the perpetrators and the abolitionists were on the same religious team.
 
You are eating up some Russian propaganda.

I live relatively close to Ukraine, we have seen first hand what happened between Russia and Ukraine in the last ~35 years. Ukraine wanted to get closer to the west to finally start developing. Russia sees this as threat and wants to force them to stay inside their sphere of influence, that's why this conflict started.

No one in the west pushed for any kind of war, there was close to zero chance that Ukraine would ever enter NATO. And read to EU would be quite long (Ukraine would have to improve a lot of things to be able to join).

Georgia also didn't want to attack Russia in 2008...
It's all propaganda just choose your own preference. There is a lot more to all this, but let's just agree to disagree, and get back on topic.
 
As if that makes it better?
(alternate answer: Until He did genocide humans again.)

HMU where in the Bible he literally "genocides humans". You didn't name a specific group, so am I to infer ALL humans? I'd like the scripture, if you don't mind.

If you mean specific groups, yeah - in the OT. They anger him, he reacts. Congrats? He changes how he deals with humans, hence Christ arrival.

Respectfully, none of these are rebuttals to my points, and are more arguments from feelings and faith, not literature.

How so? If I read the Hobit backwards the story seems to be a bit different. The Bible, in the way it is written, matters. The timeline matters. This isn't a feelings argument.

I'm not playing semantic games. I'm literally quoting the book.

You are quoting, and then acting as if you are too simple minded to understand the quotes (and I know you are not). It's pretty clear that coveting / lusting, murder, etc. are all deemed as wrong. Playing a semantic game (eg: he didn't specifically say "slavery") seems ridiculous, when the terms he used directly imply that AND beyond.

He doesn't use the words LOOKSMAXXING either, but it does say to treat your body as a temple. You could pull from that it means to care for yourself, though of course it goes even deeper than that as well spiritually / in context.
 
Last edited:
Very true. Life back then was extremely brutal.

I doubt any of us born in this modern age of luxury could really survive those sort of circumstances our ancestors had to endure. That's why these OT stories would necessarily appear to be inspired by man, not by the divine. These are quintessentially the trials and tribulations of the ancient human experience, warts and all. One would think that a divinely-inspired story would be a bit more, well, divine.

Speak for yourself!

Modern soft life has deprived me of reaching my full potential of.......

nQ3xqn4YQnsEnvEv.jpg


...thats me, the twisted hand in the back, it was just a flesh wound :P
 
The latest TWZ report brought some very interesting insights on why this all started and how it will develop.


And for the so called Phase 2:


 
The latest TWZ report brought some very interesting insights on why this all started and how it will develop.


And for the so called Phase 2:




US: we will bomb the fuck out of you to stop you from having nukes
Iran: we have enough material for 11 nukes!
US *bombs the fuck out of iran*
Iran: shockedpikachu.jpeg
 
The latest TWZ report brought some very interesting insights on why this all started and how it will develop.


that Witkoff statement is so alarming. I'm so happy action was taken. Iran and its proxies will be declawed. Hopefully a smart new leader emerges there that wants to represent civilians and move past their blood thirsty nature. If not, then perhaps bombing Iran's military and security facilities becomes like mowing the lawn, a chore done intermittently as prevention.
 
Tthe choking points - straits for example are being monitored.
That's the theory. In practice, there aren't even a dozen tankers that have been captured.

Drones, not missiles. Russia does not that many ballistic missiles in comparison to Iran for example.
Drones (large ones) fly in hundreds.

They certainly don't have the capacity to fire dozens of advanced ballistic missiles daily.
I was talking about missiles in general but I was wrong about the numbers — not by dozens per day, but by about a ten per day on average. Ballistics are an order of magnitude smaller, of course. Nevertheless, in January, there was still a moment when Zelensky complained that some systems had run out of missiles. It is unknown how long the new supply will last and what the situation with Iran will be at that point.
 
Last edited:
That doesn't make any sense. If you want to be someone who touts Judeo-Christian teachings as the pillar and foundation of our culture, then you need to acknowledge how much that contributed to the normalization of slavery. Yes, everyone did it, and that's why it's allowed in the Bible. Because everyone did it. This is a very common apologetic talking point. Christianity itself doesn't get any special brownie points when both the perpetrators and the abolitionists were on the same religious team.
I certainly don't view Christianity as something that was entirely good but compared to other religions it was relatively speaking. When the central figure of your religion is essentially a hippie that would rather be hurt than hurt others, you are going to have generally better outcomes than a religion where it's prophet was a warlord. It would be like if Genghis khan was a prophet. I don't see abolitionists as a primarily Christian thing but rather the teipidness of the religion certainly allowed for it. I am sure there are plenty of people in Islamic countries that are against child marriage but it's much harder to end something like that if the person you worship had a child bride.
 
Plato is said to life to 80 in 1500 BC.

This young average is only due to war and sickness. If people were reasonably well off they lived more or less and long as we do today.

Infant mortality was extremely high, if you get to adulthood you could expect to live a long time.
 
Last edited:
contributed to the normalization of slavery.
It was already normal, unless you are suggesting slavery was not practiced before Christianity or outside of Christian cultures?

Christianity itself doesn't get any special brownie points when both the perpetrators and the abolitionists were on the same religious team.
Characterising 'the perpetrators of slavery' group as being Christian is not a reasonable statement. The abolitionists were overwhelmingly Christian and largely motivated by their Christianity. The perpetrator group was essentially 'everyone that could throughout history'.
 
You're inserting a lot of editorializing there, which in my opinion is a good thing, because modern Christianity can do a post-modernist recontextualizing to squeeze in modern sensibilities into the ancient dogma. However, from a literalist perspective, this is not written in the book, and there are multiple instances of contradictions and God committing or commanding what we in the modern era would consider to be bad behavior.

As a student of literature, I get it. It's fine. It's par for the course, really. Welcome to the club, even. But I can see where this is a problem for believers who have faith that this is all actually true.

You're right that this isn't a Bible study thread, and I don't intend to make this one. Perhaps someone else can make that thread.
As a student of literature you should know that language is an interesting thing. The Bible went from Hebrew to Greek to Latin to English and both Greek and Latin are notoriously hard to translate, which is one of the reasons why a literal reading of the Bible is a slippery slope.
 
Last edited:
As a student of literature you should know that language is an interesting thing. The Bible went from Hebrew to Greek to Latin to English and both Greek and Latin are notoriously hard to translate, which is one of the reasons why a literal reading of the Bible is a slippery slope.

If your contention is the The Bible is an unreliable source because translations are hard, that is a bigger problem for those of faith than it is for me.
 
Top Bottom