You can be sure that Jon Husted is trying.
Fixed.
You can be sure that Jon Husted is trying.
You are one of the most hilarious people I've ever seen in a political thread. No disrespect meant by that. We are either all panicking or being totally optimistic about the election and you just drop a huge ass post whenever about your options for putting money into the race, scenarios all drawn out, etc. Has been thoroughly entertaining to read.Lol I'm just gonna make some money. ~55% to win the election? Are you kidding me? I might put some money on Ohio just for kicks. Unfortunately my bank charges $55 for international wire transfers (yuck) but the profit margin will make up for it.
People who were betting on Romney on Intrade are giddy right now. They're making bank off the people driving Romney's stock up.
Yeah, this is why I really hope Bams can carry VA too. Or IA+CO+NV+NM.Fixed.
I guess this just proves reverse racism.I love that Dick is out there doing this, so many folks basing their hopes on his words. Watching how he justifies himself on Election Night is going to be some Grade A entertainment.
Dick will still look stupid because of the crazy margin he predicts.What if Romney wins?
Dick Morris would be more than happy to take the hate if it would ultimately mean Obama is a one term PresidentDick will still look stupid because of the crazy margin he predicts.
Dick Morris would be more than happy to take the hate if it would ultimately mean Obama is a one term President
Its ashame you're such a troll. Whatever knowledgeand insight you do have is undone by your continual trolling. If you did this on the gaming side I suspect you'd have different results.I don't want him to lose. If anything I'd like him to apologize to Hillary Clinton, and for her to apologize to him. Maybe they've done it already, who knows. Perhaps Trump will bring them closer together tomorrow
I think people tend to be vindicated for outlandish projections if they at least get the winner right.Dick will still look stupid because of the crazy margin he predicts.
You are one of the most hilarious people I've ever seen in a political thread. No disrespect meant by that. We are either all panicking or being totally optimistic about the election and you just drop a huge ass post whenever about your options for putting money into the race, scenarios all drawn out, etc. Has been thoroughly entertaining to read.
"Since 1996, there have been online candidate selection engines for every election in Finland. They are very popular and nowadays all major media have their own."
![]()
The leading Nordic newspaper has published a "Candidate Selection Engine for the US Presidental Election" based on the positions of the candidates (long explanation below the engine itself).
I haven't seen any more complex ones (or even as simple as this) at US media sites. Why is that? I'd imagine this would be the easiest tool for undecided voters. Or have I just missed all of those?
I think people tend to be vindicated for outlandish projections if they at least get the winner right.
I like that he didn't give him IndianaHe predicted Obama winning in 08.
Doesn't make his dumbass map where Louisiana was a swing state and Tennessee leaned Obama look any better.
100% Obama![]()
The leading Nordic newspaper has published a "Candidate Selection Engine for the US Presidental Election" based on the positions of the candidates (long explanation below the engine itself).
I haven't seen any more complex ones (or even as simple as this) at US media sites. Why is that? I'd imagine this would be the easiest tool for undecided voters. Or have I just missed all of those?
edit: BTW I scored 100% Obama, took the screenshot early![]()
Pretty sure they just converted American dollars to Euros for the numbers to make more sense to people in Finland.Why did it ask about Americans earning euros?
The leading Nordic newspaper has published a "Candidate Selection Engine for the US Presidental Election" based on the positions of the candidates (long explanation below the engine itself).
Rand shows big gain for Obama! Nearly +4!
Obama gained a point while Romney lost one. 49.2-45.3
Rand shows big gain for Obama! Nearly +4!
Obama gained a point while Romney lost one. 49.2-45.3
Rand shows big gain for Obama! Nearly +4!
Obama gained a point while Romney lost one. 49.2-45.3
Excitement might be abating after Obama stomped him in the foreign policy debate. He looked stupid "why don't we have more horses"wonder if we'll see any small movements in the longer trackers tomorrow. a 2-point bump across the board would seal the deal.
this shift apparently comes to us from a 2-point slide in romney voters' intentions to vote.
wonder if we'll see any small movements in the longer trackers tomorrow. a 2-point bump across the board would seal the deal.
this shift apparently comes to us from a 2-point slide in romney voters' intentions to vote.
He looked stupid "why don't we have more horses"
That tends to happen, sort of like Palin's "I can see Russia from my house." The line that was parodying was just as stupid but not quite the same.i'm kinda surprised that people are actually attributing this to him (not that i'm saying you're doing the same). that 'zinger' was really the takeaway line of the debate.
It makes me think of the weird kids at my school who knew every detail of every war and were fascinated by older styled weapons. I don't know if that's a universal stereotype or not.That's how good the line was: people actually believe Romney wants more horses and bayonets. It's an "Al Gore created the internet" moment that will probably live on regardless of who wins.
the bayonets and horses line was good on its own, but 'battleships that have planes that land on them' and 'battleships that go underwater' was fucking brutal.
A few tables away sat Jose Navarro of Chesapeake, the outlier in this unscientific man-on-the-street survey. He voted for Obama four years ago but considered himself undecided this time around until the president uttered the horses-and-bayonets crack. The comment pushed him into Romney territory.
That kind of turned me off, said Navarro, 51, who does database administration as a civilian Navy employee. That was kind of sarcastic and unpresidential. . . . He sounded pompous.
Did someone say that we haven't had enough discussion of how stupid undecided voters are?
Did someone say that we haven't had enough discussion of how stupid undecided voters are?
It makes me think of the weird kids at my school who knew every detail of every war and were fascinated by older styled weapons. I don't know if that's a universal stereotype or not.
It makes me think of the weird kids at my school who knew every detail of every war and were fascinated by older styled weapons. I don't know if that's a universal stereotype or not.
It's because Joe has caught teh romnesia.Wow... So Joe Scarborough is depressed that Obama has to stoop to talking about Romnesia, ignoring the fact that what he's talking about is real, that Romney is changing his positions by the day. I love this faux outrage about the term.
Wow... So Joe Scarborough is depressed that Obama has to stoop to talking about Romnesia, ignoring the fact that what he's talking about is real, that Romney is changing his positions by the day. I love this faux outrage about the term.
He looks the other way when every other word coming out of Romney's mouth contradicts the last one, but is appalled when Obama points out said behavior.
It's because Joe has caught teh romnesia.
The double standard seriously blows my mind.Welcome to the failure that is the American media.
He's not alone though. It would appear that most voters ignore Romney's ridiculous amount of flip-flops.