I lit up one of my graduate students...

Status
Not open for further replies.
2. Using it to call attention to a double entendre that either you or someone else said, in the same vein as 'that's what she said' (how i've heard it used mostly among my friends)

What you're talking about falls under category 1, which I agree is stereotypical and frankly childish.

But category 2 doesn't come off to me as relying on any stereotype for humor. Only the double entedre.

If in fact it's offensive simply because the words 'no' and 'homo' are in close proximity to each other, than that's a different discussion. I'm just trying to flesh out the context in which it's sometimes used...

I don't understand what you're talking about. You need to give concise conversation example. You mean something like "No kidding?" then why don't just say "No kidding"?
 
I don't understand what you're talking about. You need to give concise conversation example. You mean something like "No kidding?" then why don't just say "No kidding"?

It was clear we had a misunderstanding.

To steal from cyan's video earlier, imagine two people talking, in this case men. One person spills a secret they shouldn't have:

Person 1: Oh, sorry, forget that it came out of my mouth
Person 2: haha no homo.

(it's not the best example but it'll do)

Now, let's repeat with that's what she said (stolen again, shamelessly):

Me and my co-workers were waiting for work orders to come back from a client for a while, and all the comments were sent back at once. While reviewing the notes I said without thinking about it, "It's not that it's hard, it just all came in at once." TWSS

I frankly don't see those as very different. Do you?
 
I don't really like the comparison to "that's what she said" because "that's what she said" doesn't have another implication that essentially says "thank god I'm not a woman."

Whether or not you're using "no homo" solely for a double entendre, the other implication still exists. And keeping the word alive for one use is just keeping it alive for the other as well because sadly some people aren't aware enough to tell the difference.
 
Here's my response to a similar question from earlier in the thread:
I wish I wasn't on my phone...but there's only so much I can type. Anyway there is absolutely nothing wrong with reassuring someone (yes croc even verbally) that their opinion of you is wrong - whether they think youre gay, Jewish, an artist or a chocolate lover. I'd agree that the kid in the OP was stupid because there needs no clarification for what he was doing.

I just think of that phrase as almost a synonym for "purely platonic" - only its specifically reserved for use between the same gender.
 
I don't really like the comparison to "that's what she said" because "that's what she said" doesn't have another implication that essentially says "thank god I'm not a woman."

Whether or not you're using "no homo" solely for a double entendre, the other implication still exists. And keeping the word alive for one use is just keeping it alive for the other as well because sadly some people aren't aware enough to tell the difference.

I'm not fighting for it's continued used, by any means. It was just an sidebar that made for interesting linguistic debate. I, like many people here have said, basically know when to keep my mouth shut in the company of strangers, but when people tell me that something is offensive I do try to change my habits even in the company of friends. One example is 'retarded'. Regardless of it's correct and literal meaning, it has a derogatory subtext so I try to avoid it. Nothing will ever stop me from pointing out double entendre though. They're like fart jokes, nobody every truly outgrows them :D
 
I can't imagine anything worse than being blasted by bish IRL. I reckon I'd shit my pants.

I'm on bish's side here. The guy probably didn't mean anything offensive out of it but it's very inappropriate.
 
A course in game design. So how big is the chance the student in question is a GAF member?

Good you corrected him. Let's hope there is at least one or two persons in that class that got a bit smarter with that.
 
It was clear we had a misunderstanding.

To steal from cyan's video earlier, imagine two people talking, in this case men. One person spills a secret they shouldn't have:

Person 1: Oh, sorry, forget that it came out of my mouth
Person 2: haha no homo.

That doesn't even make sense and it's not even funny. To me that's an equivalent of saying "That's gay" instead of saying something like "That's gross". It's using homosexual-related words to indicate dislike, basically equating the sexuality as undesirable in the process.

As for your situation, most normal people would just say "Ha ha, no worries". It's not complicated, is it?
 
And most sexuality related jokes are not meant for school or work for a million reasons
 
It was clear we had a misunderstanding.

To steal from cyan's video earlier, imagine two people talking, in this case men. One person spills a secret they shouldn't have:

Person 1: Oh, sorry, forget that it came out of my mouth
Person 2: haha no homo.

(it's not the best example but it'll do)

Now, let's repeat with that's what she said (stolen again, shamelessly):

Me and my co-workers were waiting for work orders to come back from a client for a while, and all the comments were sent back at once. While reviewing the notes I said without thinking about it, "It's not that it's hard, it just all came in at once." TWSS

I frankly don't see those as very different. Do you?
One is offensive to gays. The second is offensive to no one. I've heard a number of women say, "That's what she said" in the proper humorous context. Would you make a reference to China, and then add, "haha, no chink." ? I'm guessing no.
 
That doesn't even make sense and it's not even funny. To me that's an equivalent of saying "That's gay" instead of saying something like "That's gross". It's using homosexual-related words to indicate dislike, basically equating the sexuality as undesirable in the process.

As for your situation, most normal people would just say "Ha ha, no worries". It's not complicated, is it?

Apparently it is complicated. I don't know how 'no worries' fits in anywhere here, to be honest.

In addition, this is clearly personal for you, i get that, but you're projecting the idea of 'undesirability' onto this whole thing (in this specific case). It is simply pointing out the entendre (for some people, and in my case) and has nothing to do with 'liking' or 'disliking' the act in question.
 
I'm not fighting for it's continued used, by any means. It was just an sidebar that made for interesting linguistic debate. I, like many people here have said, basically know when to keep my mouth shut in the company of strangers, but when people tell me that something is offensive I do try to change my habits even in the company of friends. One example is 'retarded'. Regardless of it's correct and literal meaning, it has a derogatory subtext so I try to avoid it. Nothing will ever stop me from pointing out double entendre though. They're like fart jokes, nobody every truly outgrows them :D

That's definitely nice to hear, as I do the same. I know back in high school even I used to say gay and retarded and stuff just because lots of other people did. No one ever asked me to stop, I just thought, "What do I gain by saying these things people find offensive? Nothing."

There's definitely room for debate here; I'm not demanding everyone find it offensive like some people seem to think. I'm just explaining why it IS offensive to people, yet apparently other people finding it offensive isn't a good enough reason for some people to stop using it. It just gets me that some people's thought process seems to be "I don't find it offensive so I will keep saying it," and ends there. As if the thought of something they say being offensive to someone is so...well, offensive to them, that they spitefully continue using it.
 
One is offensive to gays. The second is offensive to no one. I've heard a number of women say, "That's what she said" in the proper humorous context. Would you make a reference to China, and then add, "haha, no chink." ? I'm guessing no.
so the root problem in your opinion is the use of "homo"? I wouldn't disagree if that's what you're implying but for arguments sake whats your opinion if they say "no homosexual" or some derivative of that.
 
Apparently it is complicated. I don't know how 'no worries' fits in anywhere here, to be honest.

If you can't explain then don't expect people to understand how you came to that conclusion. From what I can understand someone had said something a bit sexual and became apologetic. All you have to do is to simply reply "Ha ha, no worries". How does "No homo" fit in there. Please explain.

In addition, this is clearly personal for you, i get that, but you're projecting the idea of 'undesirability' onto this whole thing (in this specific case). It is simply pointing out the entendre (for some people, and in my case) and has nothing to do with 'liking' or 'disliking' the act in question.

Your asking if it's okay or not, and I told you, as someone who's AFFECTED by that word, that it's not okay. And yet, you keep insisting that it's okay. What else can I say to that? It'd be like me saying something insulting about Jewish people but I keep saying that it's not insulting because I don't feel that it's insulting despite people of Jewish origin have told me otherwise.

Also, don't expect people to not raise their eyebrow if you go around saying that word while conversing with them. I mean I don't even understand how that word will fit in any normal conversation.
 
If you can't explain then don't expect people to understand how you came to that conclusion. From what I can understand someone had said something a bit sexual and became apologetic. All you have to do is to simply reply "Ha ha, no worries". How does "No homo" fit in there. Please explain.
I think you're confused.
 
Need a gif representation of this smackdown.

it1WDyMivvcyk.gif

Damn! Gaf delivers.
 
That's definitely nice to hear, as I do the same. I know back in high school even I used to say gay and retarded and stuff just because lots of other people did. No one ever asked me to stop, I just thought, "What do I gain by saying these things people find offensive? Nothing."

There's definitely room for debate here; I'm not demanding everyone find it offensive like some people seem to think. I'm just explaining why it IS offensive to people, yet apparently other people finding it offensive isn't a good enough reason for some people to stop using it. It just gets me that some people's thought process seems to be "I don't find it offensive so I will keep saying it," and ends there. As if the thought of something they say being offensive to someone is so...well, offensive to them, that they spitefully continue using it.

IMO, I have as much control over strangers getting offended by what I say as they have control of me saying it in the first place.

People will say childish things. The people who say them in public are saying more about themselves than they are about anyone else. It's classless (low-rent? is that offensive? probably), so for me it just simply doesn't pay to get offended (butt-hurt?) because, to sound elitist, the moment someone says something like that in public I know that I'm better than them. Feelsgoodman

To bring this all around back to OP, I think bish did the guy and his class a service, if by ' lit up' he meant 'explained how and why that behavior is inappropriate in public and how committing it will hurt them , by making them look classless in front of their peers, possibly hurting their chances for upward mobility and the like.

Frankly I don't think you can teach people to be nice, or, more specifically, empathetic. IMO it's innate.
 
Frankly I don't think you can teach people to be nice, or, more specifically, empathetic. IMO it's innate.

So if you have kids/brother/sister and one of them come out as gay you can't be emphatic to their plight? To refrain yourself from making them feel bad about their sexuality?

I feel sorry for them already.
 
now you're straight up trolling.

While my tone has turned into sarcasm, I'm not even trolling. Some people are not willing to understand something until it hits them in the face. Then they'd have no choice but to deal with the reality at hand. It's usually not until someone close to you actually in the same position as those that you insult/make fun of that you finally understand why something is insulting. You can then either: try to be a better person, to develop empathy for them. Or to reject them completely out of your life. Which person would you become?
 
Good job, bish.

There is nothing wrong with that phrase.

Typical PC gaf overreaction.
There is something wrong with that phrase. It feeds into ignorant notions of how guys are supposed to behave. It paints gay people as gross or weak, as objects for mockery. What's so fucking PC about acting like a decent human being? It's not that hard to stop using tactless phrases that belittle other people.
 
While my tone has turned into sarcasm, I'm not even trolling. Some people are not willing to understand something until it hits them in the face. Then they'd have no choice but to deal with the reality at hand. It's usually not until someone close to you actually in the same position as those that you insult/make fun of that you finally understand why something is insulting. You can then either: try to be a better person, to develop empathy for them. Or to reject them completely out of your life. Which person would you become?

I'm not disagreeing with what you're saying now. I was simply engaging in a debate about the meaning of the phrase in different contexts and we had a serious misunderstanding about what I meant. It's frankly too late in the evening for me to elaborate, so let's just leave it at that.
 
I hate that phrase, and I'm glad you let that guy know how annoying it is, he can use it with his stupid friends but not in a class setting no matter how funny he thinks it is
 
in what context?

In a very similar way as "thats what she said." Just a phrase comes up in as small joke every now and then. You hear it a lot in a joking way up north, and especially in the military. I'd blame cam'ron for starting the phrase.

If this stuff offends you, I can understand. The guy was inappropriate by doing that in class. There is a time and place for joking around. In a professional environment, bad form.

But I think people need to lighten up as well.

I also say "make me a sandwich, with some waffle fries" to my girlfriend all the time. She knows I'm joking and would never demand her around like that. One time I came home and she actually made me a sandwich, and we just laughed.

I'm 25, feel free to call me immature I guess. I smoke rocks.
 
Bish handled that situation exactly the right way. It's a terrible phrase and people need to be more mindful of the things they say.
 
I like teaching but I don't know how people do it full time. Rewarding but really hard work.

Teaching is a calling. It really is a demanding profession and it will take in as much as you put into it.

Still, it is so rewarding watching your students grow both intellectually and emotionally. The positive impact a teacher can last a life-time, even in game design.

Teach 'em right.

There are several reasons why your student's mindset will be a huge detriment to his career in game design, not to mention his development as a human being. I hope you were able to turn the whole ordeal into a positive experience- not necessarily for his sake, but for the sake of the class. I find that temper and rage are not the way reach students, only because they tend to stop listening when you enter parent mode. In game design though, you need to be so in tune with the experience you're trying to provide, as well as the people you're trying to reach that closing off your mind to different ways of thinking / living is just hampering yourself creatively / professionally. Whatever, I'm not telling you anything you probably don't already know.

I can go on and on about teaching and its techniques, but I'm not a master. I'd LOVE to teach and I struggled with the decision to go into education or game design. Eventually, I figured that game design would give me more time with my family (yeah, can you believe it!) and would pay more. Also, the stress and demand of teaching at a public school, especially a low-income school where kids are facing the troubles of the community and home, would demand too much from my family. It's too bad and I still think about it at times because that's where you can really make a difference in the future.
 
I didn't think a phrase could be over analyzed this much, but I stand corrected by all the part-time psychologists that are in this thread.

A friend tells an offensive joke. It's hilarious.
A stranger tells the same offensive joke. Who the FUCK do they think they are?
Life *shrug*
 
Game design....

So your student probably reads gaf. Not only did you berate him publicly in front of his peers, but you are showing him how much you despise his actions on the Internet amongst an even larger group of his peers. I'm not saying what he did was right or acceptable, but I can't agree with your actions either. Especially when this entire thing was a well intended gesture.
 
Had this been a first or second year undergrad I would have said you were being to hard on him. But a grad school kid in his mid twenties? Well played.
 
He admitted that he jokingly didn't want any guys hitting on him.
It always fascinates me to realize how some people think that "being gay" really means "hitting on anything and everything as long as it's got a cock".
Seriously, they're college graduates, they should know better.

And nobody said anything until you went berserk on the guy? That's really fucking sad.
 
Yeah, I can see that tbh.

But I can also see it being used as a harmless indicator that the preceding action was not meant in a homosexual manner, especially if it's something which for whatever reason could be seen as such by someone.

It is immature though, not sure if I'd consider it hate speech though. Certainly not a professional attitude though so fair on bish to deal with it.

that is probably its intent, but in that case shouldn't you also put a 'no hetero' to reassure female students that you don't expect sexual favours in return for a chocolate?

surely a simple gift should be assumed to not have any sexual connotations by default? no explanations necessary.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom