Kotaku Rumor: Microsoft 6 months behind in game production for X720 [Pastebin = Ban]

To further elaborate:

The announcement of the Wii U forced the start of the next generation. This is why Microsoft and Sony are scrambling to release their systems. However, they didn't have the extra time Nintendo had in building their next gen console. This is why I believe these companies (Microsoft and Sony) will run into some serious launch problems.
Scrambling?
 
This is all symptomatic of a company who desperately wanted to push next gen well into 2014, in order to get one last pay day from the 360 via 2013 Christmas sales, but have had their hands forced by Sony.

Ofc the winning console wants to stretch as long as possible and the losing wants a new start. Can you blame them?
 
Not surprising that Microsoft's games aren't up to snuff. Some felt it was a smart move this gen that they bought exclusives as opposed to investing in internal studios like Sony. Now they're trying to launch a new system and the quality apparently isn't there, much like it wasn't there with the Kinect launch.

I really want to see this Microsoft fall flat on their face next gen. They're certainly not the same Microsoft that launched the 360. The Microsoft that seemed passionate about gaming.
One thing Microsoft exclusives games don't have is a lack of quality for the most part. The timeframe might be behind but they tend to release quality games.
 
Holy shit if true. It's been over 7 years since the 360 launched. One would think that MS would have taken the time to properly prepare for the next generation.

May 21st can't come soon enough...
 
This contradicts what Phil Spencer said on twitter about not having enough time between the two events to discuss all of the content.

I realize that he isn't going to say "we have nothing to show", but I think that would lead to silence not gloating.
 
This is all symptomatic of a company who desperately wanted to push next gen well into 2014, in order to get one last pay day from the 360 via 2013 Christmas sales, but have had their hands forced by Sony.

The glaring problem with that theory is the fact that Microsoft has absolutely no retail Xbox 360 games announced for holiday 2013.


This contradicts what Phil Spencer said on twitter about not having enough time between the two events to discuss all of the content.

I realize that he isn't going to say "we have nothing to show", but I think that would lead to silence not gloating.

Yes, this is most likely nothing but a minor setback for Microsoft, but it's been overblown, just like the majority of things we've been hearing about lately. Oh well, we don't have much longer to wait.
 
Quinton, you're making it sound like everything about the design of the PS4 was an afterthought. It is not, far from it.

All this about not showing anything tangible about the console up to this point, in turn corraborating your belief that Sony were rushed because you're comparing it to Nintendo's WiiU scenario is delusional.

Discussion based on speculation is interesting, denial based on speculation is not.
 
Ofc the winning console wants to stretch as long as possible and the losing wants a new start. Can you blame them?

No I don't blame them, but it's symptomatic of the arrogance that seems to blight the winning console manufacturer of any particular generation.

..just as Nintendo & Sony suffered a fall from grace because of it with the N64 & PS3 (in relative terms compared to SNES, PS1 & PS2), MS are about to suffer the same fate.
 
Is any company every where they want to be with a console launch and games line-up? Even the Vita, which had what's widely considered a great line-up for games petered out quickly. Nothing to play is the bane of early adopters; that won't change.
 
The glaring problem with that theory is the fact that Microsoft has absolutely no retail Xbox 360 games announced for holiday 2013.

If MS had had their way, some of the projects now destined for the next Xbox in 2014 would have been appearing this Christmas for the 360.

..all they would have needed to get another pay day is 1 or 2 AAA titles.

The reason the 360 has nothing of note for 2013, is because last year, they knew Sony was going to jump first, so shifted their 1st party's to new Xbox development.
 
This is what happened folks. In my opinion, Nintendo forced Microsoft and Sony to play their hand with the announcement of the WiiU. With further pressure from 3rd parties on developing a new console, both Microsoft and Sony were caught with their pants down. I feel as though both of these next gen consoles are being rushed and will run into many more problems than what Nintendo is running into with the Wii U.
That is almost certainly not what happened.

Did you miss Sony's PS4 reveal where Cerny said they'd been working on it since 2007? Microsoft will have probably been working on the next Xbox for a similar amount of time.

I suppose we shouldn't be taking you seriously either then ?
:lol
 

Yep, the situation isn't as ideal and "all according to plans" as a lot of enthusiasts think (i'm strictly talking of time schedule here, not hypothetical hardware problems):
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=56157072&postcount=353
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=56160880&postcount=472

Still, it's better than Microsoft, and was by all means to be expected for a console in-progress, with constantly evolving dev kits. It's just that between what we've heard from the PR campaign since the PS4 reveal, and what i've been told from legit sources on the state of their next-gen multi-port, the difference between the two portrayal is embarrassing for the gaming media who perhaps aren't enough inquiring on these matters and swallow all the positive buzz without caution.
 
I believe this because it fits with Microsoft's history. Their internal studios have no idea what gamers want outside of Forza, Fable, and Halo. Look at all of the failed first party releases on the original Xbox. They don't even trust Rare anymore because they're games were good to great, but they didn't set sales charts afire. So it comes down to money and what they think will be popular. Which is why I still think this console is going to be a focus tested nightmare in the end.
 
One thing Microsoft exclusives games don't have is a lack of quality for the most part. The timeframe might be behind but they tend to release quality games.

Sorry but I disagree. Unless it's Halo or Forza the quality isn't quite there and neither is the marketing push. Fable is long gone, they killed Crakdown, and Rare isn't impressing anyone no matter what they make.
 
Yep, the situation isn't as ideal and "all according to plans" as a lot of enthusiasts think (i'm strictly talking of time schedule here, not hypothetical hardware problems):
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=56157072&postcount=353
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=56160880&postcount=472

Still, it's better than Microsoft, and was by all means to be expected for a console in-progress, with constantly evolving dev kits. It's just that between what we've heard from the PR campaign since the PS4 reveal, and what i've been told from legit sources on the state of their next-gen multi-port, the difference between the two portrayal is embarrassing for the gaming media who perhaps aren't enough inquiring on these matters and swallow all the positive buzz without caution.

We also have 3 people saying you are wrong about the devkits and they have given info before .
 
Yep, the situation isn't as ideal and "all according to plans" as a lot of enthusiasts think (i'm strictly talking of time schedule here, not hypothetical hardware problems):
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=56157072&postcount=353
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=56160880&postcount=472

Still, it's better than Microsoft, and was by all means to be expected for a console in-progress, with constantly evolving dev kits. It's just that between what we've heard from the PR campaign since the PS4 reveal, and what i've been told from legit sources on the state of their next-gen multi-port, the difference between the two portrayal is embarrassing for the gaming media who perhaps aren't enough inquiring on these matters and swallow all the positive buzz without caution.

And this is what I've been saying, but that's Sony fanboys for ya.
 
Yep, the situation isn't as ideal and "all according to plans" as a lot of enthusiasts think (i'm strictly talking of time schedule here, not hypothetical hardware problems):
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=56157072&postcount=353
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=56160880&postcount=472

Still, it's better than Microsoft, and was by all means to be expected for a console in-progress, with constantly evolving dev kits. It's just that between what we've heard from the PR campaign since the PS4 reveal, and what i've been told from legit sources on the state of their next-gen multi-port, the difference between the two portrayal is embarrassing for the gaming media who perhaps aren't enough inquiring on these matters and swallow all the positive buzz without caution.

And lest we forget bishoptl's response to your posts:

Um, what? That part is incorrect.
 
For years now, Microsoft have publicly said "As soon as Sony move, we're ready to roll".
And now...here we are. Sony seems to have caught them totally off guard, and it makes no sense.
 
For years now, Microsoft have publicly said "As soon as Sony move, we're ready to roll".
And now...here we are. Sony seems to have caught them totally off guard, and it makes no sense.

It actually just sounds like things have gone awry. Schedules being missed and so forth. The best laid schemes of mice and men, Go often awry.
 
And this is what I've been saying, but that's Sony fanboys for ya.

im0R89qJuMjy1.gif
 
If MS had had their way, some of the projects now destined for the next Xbox in 2014 would have been appearing this Christmas for the 360.

..all they would have needed to get another pay day is 1 or 2 AAA titles.

The reason the 360 has nothing of note for 2013, is because last year, they knew Sony was going to jump first, so shifted their 1st party's to new Xbox development.

Assume much?
 
Thread about a huge third party game possibly going exclusive for Durango: 51k views currently

Thread implying Durango problems and trouble etc etc...128k views

About sums it up I guess.
 
If MS had had their way, some of the projects now destined for the next Xbox in 2014 would have been appearing this Christmas for the 360.

..all they would have needed to get another pay day is 1 or 2

The reason the 360 has nothing of note for 2013, is because last year, they knew Sony was going to jump first, so shifted their 1st party's to new Xbox development.

Completely made up.

Why would MS compete against the most expensive game they ever made in history with 1 or 2 more AAA exclusives last holiday.

They shifted first party because they knew they were going next gen. They were talking with devs at the last E3 about their plans for Next gen.

In fact, everyone thought MS was going to announce at last year's E3 and they wisely held off.
 
Im still not seeing numbers from your sources.

Show me the numbers mate, or stop spouting crap.

the GDDR5 PDF shows that you can have GDDR5 with the exact same latency as DDR3

Did you read it? can you even read?, I'm doubting it atm.

Why programmability at all? Just put it at lowest possible. Or are there any downsides when choosing the lowest possible?
And of course we don't know the latency the RAM of PS4 will have.
 
Jeff Gerstmann said something to the effect of there's going to be lots of third party exclusives on both sides.

Arthur Gies (I know, a curse around here) also mentioned that both consoles would have an abundance of exclusives and that it would be difficult if you were planning on only buying one console.
 
Why programmability at all? Just put it at lowest possible. Or are there any downsides when choosing the lowest possible?
And of course we don't know the latency the RAM of PS4 will have.

Theres a range and in a way programmability because specific speeds may not be stable at specific latencies.
 
Thread about a huge third party game possibly going exclusive for Durango: 51k views currently

Thread implying Durango problems and trouble etc etc...128k views

About sums it up I guess.

Thing is the first was/is expected by many, the second not so much.

I expect even more 3rd party exclusives.
 
Thing is the first was/is expected by many, the second not so much.

I expect even more 3rd party exclusives.

I've been in the Respawn thread but not being much of a CoD player didn't have a great deal to say. Plus I frown upon the practice of moneyhatting but if it buys MS success good luck to them as it's a valid strategy.
 
Thread about a huge third party game possibly going exclusive for Durango: 51k views currently

Thread implying Durango problems and trouble etc etc...128k views

About sums it up I guess.

This thread hasn't been about Durango problems for several pages. I will admit, when I read the post about overheating I instantly thought of this lol

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7ZeFDe44Ddo

Canyonero.jpg

Unexplained fires are a matter for the courts!
 
Yep, the situation isn't as ideal and "all according to plans" as a lot of enthusiasts think (i'm strictly talking of time schedule here, not hypothetical hardware problems):
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=56157072&postcount=353
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=56160880&postcount=472

Still, it's better than Microsoft, and was by all means to be expected for a console in-progress, with constantly evolving dev kits. It's just that between what we've heard from the PR campaign since the PS4 reveal, and what i've been told from legit sources on the state of their next-gen multi-port, the difference between the two portrayal is embarrassing for the gaming media who perhaps aren't enough inquiring on these matters and swallow all the positive buzz without caution.
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=56161460&postcount=492
If you look at these rumours closely, it's pointless stuff to be concerned about. And it's the nature of the beast also, so to speak. Projects this large have various issues present themselves and can be quite dynamic at times. Plus, the whole MS is behind Sony in software development. Isn't that somewhat obvious to expect? SCE have several more teams on software development than them; the majority of whom have matured throughout the last generation. All launch software, or launch targeted software, runs into various issues. It's part of the difficulty of working within constrained limits.


Nothing to miss. He's wrong about the PS4 for one.
 
Top Bottom