I hate reading espn. When Spurs are down 2-1, what do they say? lol, good try grizz spurs will most likely come back. Then 3-1 happens. Them: uhhhhh, great storyline (no analysis)! Lakers are up 2-1? We told you it would be quick. 2-2 happens. Them: ohhh those crafty hornets, chris paul is everything on that team, if Lakers play to potential it would be over!
For fucks sakes espn, get you're head out of your collective asses and give credit where credit's due. Stop hedging your bets. Their ability to admit that the supposed "good" teams are faltering is never because the bad team is playing very well, its always cause the good team is playing under their potential.
Is their Insider articles full of the same bs? Lakers are tied because Gray, Okafur, and Landry are playing physical on the inside and its not the cakewalk they thought it would be. Oh? Lamar isn't consistent? Pau is a soft puss? The killer B's should be scoring more (what a dumb fucking name)? Its like they don't watch actual in season games and just look at box scores. Spurs are down because they just aren't as hungry or as physical. Where'd the defense go? Why aren't they hitting their jumpers? So dumb.
Man, I hate reading their bs and each time I think it will be different but it never is. Sorry, had to get that off the chest.