What about "no one even discussed" what ifs on this page is so hard to understand? 2000-2004. omg
Those Orlando teams without Mac are significantly worse than the worst team of all-time Charlotte Bobcats.
Again, we're talking individual performance - not what ifs, and his individual performances, especially between 2000 and 2004 were, on another level.
And if you're going to pin game 7 on Dallas on him, then give him credit for it even being a series in the first place.
Its crazy how Lakers fans love playing the "blame the #1 guy!" game only when Kobe isn't involved.
Did you not read where where I mentioned their G6 run?
And the sane ones blame #1, period, that's how it is. 2008, Kobe caught it for shooting like shit and blowing a 21-point lead. He responded with two rings, and avenged one of his Finals defeats, along with the Suns. Revenge Tour was a thing of beauty.
T-Mac? Not so much. And without their respective stars, both those LA and Orlando teams are terrible.
Again, we can drop it, because we aren't going to agree, and long-term, there is no comparison.
Only rings matter.
<the dumbest fucking argument you can make regarding individual talent/success>
(and all of this bullshit is still better than talking about a crappy sixers/celtics game)
Actually, it's more parallel. Kobe and Magic have the same amount of rings, beat the Celtics, and set numerous records over the course of their careers.
That can be argued either way. Magic had his up and downs too, from Tragic Johnson to getting his coach fired.
But winning cures everything. I wish there was something I could say about the lolcats, but you have no hope anyway, and already shout this from the high heavens, so no point.
Cloving, I can see where you're coming from, and can roll with it, no biggie.
And the Celtics are going to win anyway, I'll watch only because it's on. The real Finals start tomorrow.