"Unbearable with all its bullshit"?ok, so I found The Conjuring to be almost unbearable with all it's bulllshit. I genuinely don't know why it's regarded positively.
The Conjuring is like the last horror film I would expect to get hit with that.
"Unbearable with all its bullshit"?ok, so I found The Conjuring to be almost unbearable with all it's bulllshit. I genuinely don't know why it's regarded positively.
Can you go into what you didn't like?
For me the movies are incredibly well crafted but have utterly awful plots and, despite great actors, pretty uninspired and dull characters.
Its pretty good. Its a bit stodgy and dialogue heavy for a while, and not the best example of Carpenters visual skills, but the pay off is worth it imo.
I actually kind of dug it. Reedus is really good in it, easy to forget the guy can act since he's mostly known for The Walking Dead. It's a nice little mystery/paranoia thriller that kind of reminded me of something Polanski would have done. It's not top-tier Carpenter but a good little flick.
Conjuring 1 was okayCan you go into what you didn't like?
For me the movies are incredibly well crafted but have utterly awful plots and, despite great actors, pretty uninspired and dull characters.
I'm not sure the best way to describe it, but there's this aggravating smugness and self-masturbatory quality to everything that reminds me of what little I've seen of God's Not Dead. The movie continually tries to make the Lorraines out to be some incredibly humble yet self-sacrificing perfect hero types.... I don't think most of the dialogue and characters would be out of place in some parody flick, yet The Conjuring tries to play it pretty seriously.
I'm not sure if it really makes sense to separate the quality of the plot and characters from how well-crafted the movie is, so I don't really get what you mean by that.
Do you feel that a horror movie has to scare you, the viewer, to be a scary film?
I'm not sure the best way to describe it, but there's this aggravating smugness and self-masturbatory quality to everything that reminds me of what little I've seen of God's Not Dead. The movie continually tries to make the Lorraines out to be some incredibly humble yet self-sacrificing perfect hero types.... I don't think most of the dialogue and characters would be out of place in some parody flick, yet The Conjuring tries to play it pretty seriously.
I'm not sure if it really makes sense to separate the quality of the plot and characters from how well-crafted the movie is, so I don't really get what you mean by that.
I didnt find it scary because of the subject matter, but because the body horror element of seeing this girl decay and worsen, and the slow disturbing torture she suffers, and how every attempt at helping her only makes it worse. Its a bleak disturbing film and its scary because it makes you feel scared for Regan and her worsening plight. It could be a disease or demons or nanomachine infection, and it would still be the same kind of horrific storyNo, I understand that it's supposed to be a scary movie due to the subject matter and I get that not everyone is scared by the same kind of stuff.
But when the movie box itself says "The Scariest Film of All Time" then there's a certain expectation.
Didn't mind the stuff with the Warrens (thats who you're referring to with the Lorraines, right?) because we don't get likeable protagonists in horror films that often anymore (disregarding the real people). Most are either empty or cannon fodder.
Ah, gotcha. And in total agreement. I utterly love the craft of the movie, but damn the story is just that and despite some amazing actors in the flick the characters walk that line of "I know everything" conveniently until they don't know everything. Don't get me started on the real-life Lorraines.
I tend to like it overall (at least to a point) because of it's superb camera work and use of shadow, light and space, almost old-school in a way with understanding patience. Your basic elements kind of boiled down showing that simplicity is usually the best when it comes to horror. For example this scene and the patience to hold one shot for even 30 seconds and let it develop is just classic old-school type stuff I tend to appreciate. (There's a couple of better ones but they have more spoilers)
If the script was up to par and it didn't try to "celebrate" the Lorraines, and if maybe the B-plot with Annabelle was ingrained a little better, I think it would be one of the greats. The imagery and understanding of tension is there...but it's undercut by the character personalities and sidenote B-plot.
Edit: Conjuring 2 is utter trash. It has one, maybe two, well-done moment and that's it. If you didn't like the bible-beating of the first, avoid the second.
Nice spooky atmosphere and the father son relationship gets established quickly. This movie really takes its time. I feel a bit let down by the execution of the Pumpkinhead part of it even though the creature looks cool. Mixed bag for me but I'm glad I saw it. Won't watch again though. Overall 5/10
The first one was just looking for a vampire movie on-demand, and came across this. Word to the wise, perhaps choose your provider carefully. This was on SyFy and is super neutered with blurred tits and bleeped out cuss words a ton in the movie. That said didn't really see much to it aside from that. I guess it has some tough talking priest, but some really bad fire scenes.
Thanks!I enjoyed the format of your post, thank you! ��
^What did you think of Dracula's Daughter? That was on the rough draft of my list for either last year or two years ago, but I ended up not getting around to it.
You didn't miss very much. While I'm a huge Carpenter fan, Vampires was kind of meandering and placed most of its hopes in James Woods playing some tough vampire hunter. It certainly isn't a bad film, but there wasn't much to it.
I'm not sure if you already have a list of vampire films to watch, but I'd like to suggest Vamp (1986) and Innocent Blood (1992) as two underrated vampire films.
^What did you think of Dracula's Daughter? That was on the rough draft of my list for either last year or two years ago, but I ended up not getting around to it.
12) The Fly (1986)
It had been a while since I had seen this, but I had always remembered it as more of a straight horror movie, when it is a tragic horror drama. To put it in perspective, Brundle doesn't even enter the teleporter till 30 minutes into this 96 minutes movies. But it works here, because the slow gradual deterioration is what gives The Fly its timeless horror, and Goldblum's performance still makes it sad and haunting 31 years later.
His performance really is superb in this. He absolutely sells the transformation as much as the special effects do. The contrast of his shy awkward personality and his mile-a-minute mania post-fusion, those wide eyes glinting even among the twisted diseased flesh like the last sparks of his humanity, the involuntary twitches and shakes, the nervous terror giving way to insane excitement as the transformation progresses.
And those effects still hold up today, at least until the final man-fly change. But everything before that is still utterly horrifying, seeing the human body fall apart and change like that.
4. Phantasm (1979)
This was, interesting. I think this might have quite a uneven feeling throughout that at one point it would get me hooked, but in the next it felt kind of a turn off, and it leaves me a bit mixed for now. Still through, it does have a lot of cool and creepy elements to it, like the Tall Man himself, who is a pretty interesting entity.
(Also that remastered poster is awesome)
More_Badass is making us all look weak with his 13th review of the month so far and it only being the 5th of October. Seeing The Fly and The Blob back to back is practical effects heaven.
"Have you ever heard of insect politics?"
I'm batting 1000 after day 4, this is the best start I've had since I started doing this in 2011.
Might help to know that director wrote the screenplay in the midst of a messy divorce
04) Possession (1981) (Oct 4)
I was considering my entire review of this one just being a GIF of Larry David yelling "WHAT THE FUCK?" but I couldn't find one.
I don't even know what to think of Possession. It consists entirely of shouting and screaming for 2 hours and I have no idea what the hell was the point of anything but was somehow completely enthralled even though I was squirming in my seat the entire time.
I'm only giving this a score now because I've committed myself to them at this point, but if there was ever a movie that required multiple viewings before forming an opinion, this is it. Highly recommended because it simply needs to be seen if only for how audacious it is.
Finally this film will get the viewers it DESERVES!DAY FIVE: SOCIETY
In the US, its available on Amazon Prime right now. I highly recommend it.
5. Legend of Hell House - It didn't rely much on visuals, but nice setting and characters. Not a bad haunted house movie.
Incredibly strong start, Jeepers Creepers really lives up to its name in how effectively it manages to tap into our most latent fears, really getting under your skin. While the last quarter of the film shows more than it really should, the film ultimately suffers very little for it; the ending, pretty much ensuring that Jeepers Creepers goes out strong.
Finally this film will get the viewers it DESERVES!
It's goofy, gooey, and really fun. I hope you enjoy!Sweet, I might check it out tonight. Been trying to catch it for years after seeing it in these threads.
04) Possession (1981) (Oct 4)
I was considering my entire review of this one just being a GIF of Larry David yelling "WHAT THE FUCK?" but I couldn't find one.
I don't even know what to think of Possession. It consists entirely of shouting and screaming for 2 hours and I have no idea what the hell was the point of anything but was somehow completely enthralled even though I was squirming in my seat the entire time.
I'm only giving this a score now because I've committed myself to them at this point, but if there was ever a movie that required multiple viewings before forming an opinion, this is it. Highly recommended because it simply needs to be seen if only for how audacious it is.
Admittedly I did have some trouble deciphering a fair bit of the dialogue due to all of the shouting, accents and shouting with accents though. That did hurt my enjoyment a bit.
Rating:
out of 5 Bub salutes. (2.5 is considered average on this scale)
I actually kind of dug it. Reedus is really good in it, easy to forget the guy can act since he's mostly known for The Walking Dead. It's a nice little mystery/paranoia thriller that kind of reminded me of something Polanski would have done. It's not top-tier Carpenter but a good little flick.