Would an amp improve my Akg k242 HD headphones by that much? And if they do, any recommendations? This is just for PC use.
If you're just using your motherboard sound right now, a standalone DAC or soundcard would probably be a bigger improvement than an amp.
If you're just using your motherboard sound right now, a standalone DAC or soundcard would probably be a bigger improvement than an amp.
I'm using my motherboard sound and a Sony stereo acts as an amp. Would a soundcard be pretty helpful still?
Thank you sir for the info. Because I used to own the 5.8 system/headset but recently gave them away. And I didn't want to downgrade myself ordering the pro unit.The RX unit is just an additional wireless mixamp to add a second headset to the 5.8 system. This won't work on its own and requires the base station.
The Mixamp pro has all the same features and and inputs as the 5.8 but is not wireless. Order it if wires don't matter. I have one of each, wired for the pc, wireless in the living room. The lack of wires running across the floor in the living room is a huge plus in my book.
I just made that upgrade with the E10 on this computer and it was very noticeable (and I only use SR-60s).
Depending on your receiver, you may be able to use your stereo's DAC, which would probably be free improvement. Can you output optical from your motherboard to your receiver?
The last motherboards that I remember as having decent sound were nForce2-based boards, so as far as I know using a dedicated DAC would probably be the biggest improvement for most computer users. I just made that upgrade with the E10 on this computer and it was very noticeable (and I only use SR-60s).
Perhaps the Xonar DG? $20 after mail-in rebate.I'm using my motherboard sound and a Sony stereo acts as an amp. Would a soundcard be pretty helpful still?
I think someone recommended a 20$ soundcard on newegg once but i forgot what it was..
Perhaps the Xonar DG? $20 after mail-in rebate.
That sounds right. I would still be using my stereo as an amp connected to this soundcard though, would that be ok?
That's what I got, yeah, after reading this thread and doing research elsewhere.
Can anybody recommend some good wireless headphones? Ones in the $100 and $200 price range. And where to get them. I've checked Amazon and certain other high profile places but they don't seem to have ones that fit the criteria.
I'd like your input on this: my ears are very sensitive to highs, I don't know how to express it.. let's say "treble booming" or peaking; voices like Rihanna just pierce right through my ear and I rarely get comfortable listening to her on higher volumes where I don't have problems listening to any rock/metal band for hours. What's the one of these two that has a balanced high, or not that sharp?Based on the info above, you may want to go for the T1's instead. The LCD-2's have a more intimate, around the head sort of sound. It's detailed with gorgeous bass, but not incredibly spacious or stage like. More like a surround sound theatre room or studio kind of presence.
For rock, a little more space, speed, detail and soundstage goes a long way, and the T1's offer that (I personally pick my T1's over my LCD-2's every time for rock).
The LCD-2's might be better with pop however, dependant on the track, but if it's mid bass heavy instead of sub bass (sub bass is prominent with mainly Hip Hop and RnB. Dance and pop generally favour mid bass and here the T1 excels).
But lastly, with instrumentals, the T1 is the one to go for. Again, the extra space, high emphasis and sharper (but still relatively sweet) detailing will help with instrumental separation, imaging and hall or stage resemblance.
But they are both remarkable cans. You can't really go wrong with either.
I'd like your input on this: my ears are very sensitive to highs, I don't know how to express it.. let's say "treble booming" or peaking; voices like Rihanna just pierce right through my ear and I rarely get comfortable listening to her on higher volumes where I don't have problems listening to any rock/metal band for hours. What's the one of these two that has a balanced high, or not that sharp?
I thought I’d write a little post with some impressions of a used STAX combo I just got on Friday. It’s a relatively new SR-407 ear speaker (those brown rectangular things that look like they come from original trilogy Star Wars) plus an older SRM T1-S tube energizer in good shape.
I was feeding them with the Isabellina DAC and listening to mostly 256 AAC iTunes plus a few FLAC demo songs here and there.
The combo sound very good. However, to my surprise, the soundstage is not very large and doesn’t create a real “out of the head” experience as I was expecting. For that sensation, absolutely nothing I’ve listened to can match the mighty HD800. these are about on par with the D7000 for soundstage. good but not otherworldly.
But this less expensive setup than the HD800 provides similar amounts of detail and speed and has absolute wonderful tonality. It’s not quite as bright as the HD800 and sounds incredibly lifelike and natural. For a 600 dollar headphone (when new), it’s ahead of other headphones that I have used in that price range. But, of course, it also requires a more pricey, specialized “energizer” to run, so it’s hard to make it a budget hifi setup.
There is no obvious coloration to the sound that I can identify unlike with my other headphones, aside from the hD800. As much as I love my RS1 and D7000, they are not exactly presenting the music neutrally - they add their own flavour. The RS1 pushes the treble and upper midrange in your face. They’re very fun but not “natural”. The Denon D7000 has head rattling bass and still has great midrange and speed but it’s also obviously exaggerated in a different direction from the RS1 with that bass.
The Stax has much more in common with the HD800 in that it is more flat across the frequency spectrum, producing a more natural sound that can provide incredible detail and make you appreciate the subtleties of great recordings.
I’d say they provide a bit less bass than the HD800, but I have never felt the HD800 bass to be weak, when amped with enough power. The midrange “feels” more intimate and warm but I think that’s just how my brain is interpreting the more closed in soundstage compared to the HD800. It’s not a warm, lush headphone. It just presents the same details I have previously associated with the HD800 and its distant soundstage with a soundstage closer to my other dynamics so it might seem more lush.
My biggest issue with the headphones is comfort. They press more tightly on the sides of my head than I really like and the pleather pads and lack of air circulation makes my ears feel rather warm. The HD800 is much more comfortable and that’s real important to me.
I don’t know if I can keep these. On one hand, they are my second favourite headphone sound I have heard behind my HD800. But on the other hand, they are not the most comfortable headphone and require a dedicated, specialized (and huge) headphone amp. I would run out of desk space if I kept it around with my current setup. I bought them looking to replace my existing phones with something potentially cheaper but I don’t think I will ever find something to replace the HD800 without spending more money than I feel comfortable with. (like a stax SR-009 at 5K, lol)
Still, I think this type of mid-range Stax setup beats similarly priced “high end” dynamic cans if your goals are natural sound and a life like presentation. I can definitely appreciate the love behind Stax out there.
The Boston Herald reports that Ochocinco dropped around $28,000 on Beats by Dre Headphones for every member of the team. The headphones, widely regarded as the best in the industry, were designed by rapper Dr. Dre. The version Ochocinco picked out for the team produce a "clean, yet forceful sound."
Anyone eyeing the FiiO E17? I'm really interested after that review but $140 CAD, I don't know...
Headphone-GAF will get a kick out this...
http://sports.yahoo.com/blogs/nfl-s...st-super-bowl-extravagant-gift-193820706.html
:lol
Good stuff. Yet to try a Stax yet. Though when I get back in to London I should finally be able to test a pair of SR-009's. I'd never buy a pair myself though, not even if I was filthy rich. Something about the SR-009's and the LCD-3's just rub me the wrong way. Just feel they're pushing the diminishing returns thing TOO far, and add to that the whole whole host of launch issues with both was woeful.
I know these are a pretty iconic set of Stax phones, but got damn, the difference between these and the SR-007 Mk. II aesthetically are like night and day. Probably not a fair comparison as the Mk. II are probably one of the most beautiful phones out there, but still WTFI thought Id write a little post with some impressions of a used STAX combo I just got on Friday. Its a relatively new SR-407 ear speaker (those brown rectangular things that look like they come from original trilogy Star Wars) plus an older SRM T1-S tube energizer in good shape.
There was a guy on HF selling his ES5 for only $500 or so. God, I should have jumped on them and sold off some of my iems later on. That is an absolutely stupid good price for themfellow head-fier here, branching out to some other forums
Recently decided to pick up some quality iems, after moving to a new place and walking more (= more time to listen to music, rather than commute).
Decided to go with the Westone UM2: really impressed so far with them. Been trying out different tips, settled on the medium Olives, pretty great balance (Complys muffled the highs a bit for me). Definitely some nice iems for the bargain I got them at (local Westone dealer was clearing some stock for $150 off usual online prices).
But as always, the head-fi bug is kicking in, and I'm already researching custom iems lol
As for cans, I've got some HD600s that I ABSOLUTELY adore. Some of the best money I've ever spent.
fellow head-fier here, branching out to some other forums
Recently decided to pick up some quality iems, after moving to a new place and walking more (= more time to listen to music, rather than commute).
Decided to go with the Westone UM2: really impressed so far with them. Been trying out different tips, settled on the medium Olives, pretty great balance (Complys muffled the highs a bit for me). Definitely some nice iems for the bargain I got them at (local Westone dealer was clearing some stock for $150 off usual online prices).
But as always, the head-fi bug is kicking in, and I'm already researching custom iems lol
As for cans, I've got some HD600s that I ABSOLUTELY adore. Some of the best money I've ever spent.
If you want smoother, more laid back or less vivid high's, definitely go for the LCD-2's. T1's high's are far more extended. Still sweet, but more likely to be sibilant over the LCD-2's on certain rarer tracks, especially based on your description
Sweet! Thanks. Any penalty from ordering via eBay? Woo Audio *might* not ship to me.
--
What's the best portable amp? My IEMs are TripleFi, Senn CX980i, and Klipsch X10. I mainly use the TripleFi. Are FiiO the best (E17?) or do people talk about them because their products are affordable? I'd like to get a portable amp and I'm wondering. Budget is open.
Thank you guys. I like the JDS cMoyBB but I'm going to order E11 right now since it's aesthetically more appealing (I use an iPhone).
It's gonna be a great month for the audiophile in me!
Iuno if this was posted but I saw the TMA-1 for sale for 135$ with remote
http://www.hellomusic.com/ec/DealMain.aspx?did=12980&cat=FACEBOOK%PROMOTIONS
i THINK its a credible place. Got it from a coupon notification site thing that I am subscribed to.
Echoes: if you are looking for just an amp, the E11 is the best choice from the Fiio line if I am not mistaken.
Internet high five! Got mine on right now listening to some mixes from the Groundbreaking Electronic Music thread. What have you listened to? What do you think?
I got the E10 today. It seems...not that great. I can boost the sound higher and it can handle that better but the clarity of my headphones aren't as good and things just come off a bit rougher. I used the "rock" setting on the realtek controls, is there a way to get something similar on this? Because basically, it feels like everything went back to default.
I got the E10 today. It seems...not that great. I can boost the sound higher and it can handle that better but the clarity of my headphones aren't as good and things just come off a bit rougher. I used the "rock" setting on the realtek controls, is there a way to get something similar on this? Because basically, it feels like everything went back to default.
hmm.
I had an E10 for a while and I never noticed anything sounding "rough". It produced a pretty neutral amplification (bass boost off). I certainly didn't notice details being lost compared to other, more expensive amp/dacs I've tried.
Do you know how that rock setting in software adjusts the frequency curve? typically, rock EQ boosts bass and treble in a V shape. so those extra levels for the treble might give the impression of more detail since those little details are just louder. just a thought - I don't know if that's the case you have here.
Rough was the wrong word. It didn't sound as clear as when using realtek. It sounded more muffled and when testing movies I found it to be better without the E10. maybe it is the treble, is there anyway to change that with an E10?
Any of you guys have the klipsch s4i? I'm thinking about buying T-100 comply foam tips, cause the silicon tips that come with the s4i's are way too uncomfortable.
Should I do this?