CuckooBananaNuts
Banned
You were given a definition (several, in fact, as I expounded upon the original definition with clarification, all of which you refused to respond to), and you chose to simply ignore it. Instead, you relied on a rebuttal from Wikipedia, which is again a notoriously unreliable source of information, especially when it comes to political and ideological leanings. When that was pointed out, you dismissed it without a second thought. Your stance isn't moderate. It's objectively wrong. Inclusivity and diversity aren't inherently 'woke.' It becomes 'woke' when these concepts are forced in at the expense and detriment of merit or quality or other people. This isn't about "feelz." It's about reality. You've been presented with examples, but because they challenge your worldview, you dismiss them outright. You’re not being trolled. You’re just entrenched in a perspective that refuses to acknowledge any view that doesn't align with your own.Dawg,
I'm getting trolled over here hahaha. It must be. It's been fun guys, i'm out this retard hole.
- I asked for a common definition on the term woke, so we're on the same page, can even get that. Instead someone referring to some private language horseshit definition.
- Getting called bad faith for having a moderate stance on the whole thing. Meanwhile others see woke/inclusivity as inherently evil and destructive without any measurable proof other then 'feelz'
- I asked for one the folks on here kindly if he could describe my position back to me, just so that we can understand each other. Didn't hear back.
Last edited: