Hawk269
Member
Smokey said:Graphical glitches give me chills and make me itch.
They call those crabs Smokey! hehehe
Smokey said:Graphical glitches give me chills and make me itch.
drizzle said:Both my old CPU (QX6700) and GFX Card (8800 GTX) ran on the brink of 100c every single time I was playing anything graphically intense. I even had to bolt another fan on my videocard, because at 110c it would throttle down and run shit at 15fps.
Running shit in the 70-90c is good for long-term duration of your hardware? Probably not, but it's not "too hot".
Also, since we don't live in the 486 days anymore, every processing unit has countermeasures to not heat too much up. Everything throttles down when it goes over the red line.
I'm starting to lean toward this mentality. In a way, you'll be getting the most use out of your hardware between upgrades. My temps are in the high 60s now...may push harder.BoobPhysics101 said:And what the hell is 'long-term duration' of hardware anyways? Having hardware last 10-15 years instead of 5... no thanks. I'd rather push it to the max and have it die quickly and get the most for my money since I'm gonna upgrade in 2 years or less anyways.
It's hilarious seeing people freak out every time anything isn't running at 50c or below. Give me a break. On the clocks people are hitting with air-cooling, 50c is a luxury.
Rule of thumb (And this is for me personally) is to push the hardware to the limits of stability, go a notch or two below that, and enjoy nice performance while spending much less on the initial hardware. I love buying mid-range or lower high-end components and overclocking them past 'highest-end' levels.
No issues for me.Moaradin said:Does this game hate overclocks? I put my GPU back to stock clocks and now I get full 60 fps without the stuttering that I used to have.
Moaradin said:Does this game hate overclocks? I put my GPU back to stock clocks and now I get full 60 fps without the stuttering that I used to have.
zlatko said:Anyone know what causes the whole screen to flash green once in a while ?
Garrus Vakarian said:My 6870 peaks at 79 degrees (celsius) on Caspian, this is the first time it's gone above 60 in a game except for in the beta where it reached 70. I'm sure the cause is that it is an extremely hot day here, but more to the point is 80 a worrying temperature to be reaching on a GPU?
My CPU reaches a top of 54 with the stock cooling fan and the GPU is a non-reference ASUS card with a custom cooler, for reference. Sorry if this is off-topic.
BoobPhysics101 said:Seems like a weird graphics issue to me. Happens on my new GTX 570 with 285.38 beta drivers. And it happens randomly and only a couple of times and goes away.
No. Read the 10~ posts above yours for more info. 80c on a GPU is fine. 100-110c is where you're reaching the Danger Zone.
I get this too. Not annoying but still sucks.Veins said:Everyone I have talked to gets the green flashes every once and a while. Just a game bug.
Never gotten this. I only play SP though.Veins said:Everyone I have talked to gets the green flashes every once and a while. Just a game bug.
The beta ran even worse than that (low 10s, audio stuttering) on my E8500 so I guess they already optimized it a bit.ChefRamsay said:My bottleneck is a 3.0GHz C2D, yet official BF3 minimum requirements is 2.4GHz. All other components handily surpass minimum requirements (Win7 x64, 4GB RAM, GTX460 1GB). I have seen similar reports in other forums as well. Hopefully a future patch addresses CPU usage, because this game hits 100% really often - frustrating for the low end gamers!
BoobPhysics101 said:It's hilarious seeing people freak out every time anything isn't running at 50c or below. Give me a break. On the clocks people are hitting with air-cooling, 50c is a luxury.
Detox said:Any ideas what could be causing this?
![]()
It's not even exclusive to PC. I get it on both PC and 360. It seems to be more rare on 360 though.zlatko said:Hm weird. I'm using a Radeon 5870, and it is happening to me too, so it isn't discriminating against just Nvidia.
![]()
RibbedHero said:Any firm statements from DICE regarding VRAM? Game runs at 60fps on Ultra with CF 6850s, but there is some minor chugging, which gets very annoying. Could this be a VRAM issue seeing as each card only has 1GB?
Would prefer not to have to scale it back to High.
You lowered your clock rate, right? That should stop the constant crashes.Enco said:I get this too. Not annoying but still sucks.
Loads of weird bugs/glitches in the game. The most annoying is the jittery camera when viewing the guy who killed you.
I've maxed the game (post AA off cos it sucks) with my single GTX 580.
edit: the crashes are the most annoying actually
bee said:peformance is excellent for me with a single screen, 1920 x 1080 @120hz max settings, get 50-120fps with no vsync as there's zero? tearing anyway, averaging probably 75-80 fps with gtx 560 ti 2gb sli, uses about 1.4 - 1.5 gb vram
triple monitor support is broken, menus are all offset so u have to click like 2 inch to the right to select anything and the aiming dot is totally off on the jeeps etc. it still runs acceptably though at 6050 x 1080 , ultra texture. rest high except shadows medium and proper aa and ssao off, averaging around 40fps and 1.7-1.8gb vram
3D vision is broken, well it is unless u can time it so it activates properly, there's links to it on the nvidia forums but i cant be bothered messing about so i'll just wait until dice patch it in properly as they've said they will do
Metalmurphy said:1GB is simply not enough for ultra. Having CF only dupes the data so its not like u can effectively use the 2x1GB
RibbedHero said:Any firm statements from DICE regarding VRAM? Game runs at 60fps on Ultra with CF 6850s, but there is some minor chugging, which gets very annoying. Could this be a VRAM issue seeing as each card only has 1GB?
Would prefer not to have to scale it back to High.
Rename the BF3 exe inside the folder. I had the same problemMax said:I hate Origin, "verify files" downloads the 40 mb im missing, and this morning the game isnt even installed, click install game and it does nothing. So now i'm having to reinstall with my discs even though it was all on my hdd anyway
I better still have my campaign save...
Why I keep on telling people to buy 2GB or more video cards for future games. People keep on saying as long as you are only playing at X resolution it's fine. No, it's not. Resolution is only one component. Texture size, AA and etc. are others.BoobPhysics101 said:High looks about the same as Ultra textures. I run high on my GTX 570 cause the fucking thing only has 1.28GB of VRAM lol. Makes me want to sell it and buy a 6950 2 GB, but whatever.
I'll test out Ultra textures and see if I can get the game to over-use VRAM and cause problems... I'll report back with my results. I'll measure VRAM usage.
RibbedHero said:That's what I'm saying, is the 1GB too little? I've heard conflicting reports on the matter, some say the game needs around 1.3GB of VRAM, while others same the game adapts to use as much VRAM as possible, even under 1GB(I understand that these two are not necessarily mutually exclusive).
Ogs said:AMD X4 640 3.0GHz
4GB DDR2
4870 1GB
Win 7
720p on Low.
![]()
Really ?, please tell me drivers will improve this shit (using catalyst preview in OP), having a hard time enjoying this what with the performance :/
knitoe said:Why I keep on telling people to buy 2GB or more video cards for future games. People keep on saying as long as you are only playing at X resolution it's fine. No, it's not. Resolution is only one component. Texture size, AA and etc. are others.
Bubs Mugumbo said:My brother bought Battlefield 3 today thinking that his system would run it, however after trying to play it he found out that the graphics card isn't good enough. The specs for the PC are as follows:
AMD Athalon II X4 630 processor (4 CPUS)
2.8ghz
6144MB RAM
NVIDIA geforce 310 512mb
My question is, what does he need to do to get his PC to run it? Obviously a new graphics card needs to be purchased, but which one should he go for? He's looking for something that wont break the bank, but will still run this game well enough without melting his computer.
Any help is appreciated.
RibbedHero said:That is a very vague price range, but for a budget go for a HD 6850 or a GTX 460. For a bit more he could get a GTX 560Ti which would run the game rather well.
Edit: 6850/460 would run the game well at high, while the 560Ti can run the game with most things at ultra.
Bubs Mugumbo said:Would any of these cards require him to take anything else into consideration, such as extra fans/cooling systems etc for his PC? Or would the graphics card fan do the job?